Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wetz v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Wetz v. State , 503 So.2d 803 , 812 (Miss. 1987) (citing Gray v. State , 487 So.2d 1304 , 1311 (Miss. 1986)). 2000Wetz v. State, 503 So. 2d 803, 812 (Miss. 1987) (citing Gray v. State, 487 So.2d 1304, 1311 (Miss.1986)). | 1 | 2 |
Gray v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Wetz v. State , 503 So.2d 803 , 812 (Miss. 1987) (citing Gray v. State , 487 So.2d 1304 , 1311 (Miss. 1986)). 2000Wetz v. State, 503 So. 2d 803, 812 (Miss. 1987) (citing Gray v. State, 487 So.2d 1304, 1311 (Miss.1986)). | 1 | 2 |
Todd v. Claytongreen1 sentence2024“The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that a motion for Rule 11 sanctions is, in effect, a motion to amend the judgment in a cause.” Todd v. Clayton, 53 So. 3d 827, 830 (¶12) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Rigby v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Rogers’s attorney patterned that jury instruction on the jury instruction countenanced by the supreme court in Rigby v. State, 826 So.2d 694, 702-03 (¶ 14) (Miss.2002), which allowed a defendant charged with a subsequent DUI offense to stipulate that he had previously been convicted of a DUI. | 1 | 1 |
Ryan v. Stategreen1 sentence1992"The purpose of the Uniform Criminal Rule 4.06 is to avoid unfair surprise to either the state or the defendant at trial." See generally, Ryan v. State, 525 So.2d 799, 802 (Miss. 1988), citing from Acevedo v. State, 467 So.2d 220 , 223 (Miss. 1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2000Rogers, 236 Miss. 800 , 112 So.2d 250 . 2000Rogers, 236 Miss. 800 , 112 So.2d 250 . | 2 | 1998–2000 |
Rogers v. State
green
1 sentence2008Id. at (¶¶ 23-24). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Byrd v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center
green
1 sentence2002However, in a civil case, "a Motion for Reconsideration is treated as a motion to amend judgment . . . and must be filed within ten days from the entry of the judgment sought to be amended." Byrd v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center , 722 So.2d 166 , 168 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App. 1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Acevedo v. State
green
1 sentence1992"The purpose of the Uniform Criminal Rule 4.06 is to avoid unfair surprise to either the state or the defendant at trial." See generally, Ryan v. State, 525 So.2d 799, 802 (Miss. 1988), citing from Acevedo v. State, 467 So.2d 220 , 223 (Miss. 1988). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.