Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Otis Lee Weaver, Jr.green1 sentence2018Muskingum County, Case No. CT2017-0052 8 {¶26} However, because some contacts that start out as constitutional may at some point cross a line and become an unconstitutional seizure (see United States v. Weaver, 282 F.3d 302, 309 (4th Cir. 2002) ), we next consider the constitutionality of the next stage of Officer Rogers’ stop of appellant. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rogers, Ca2007-05-068 (12-28-2007)green1 sentence2018Clermont No. CA2007-05- 068, 2007-Ohio-7076, ¶ 5-6 (refusing to address Rogers’s challenge to matters pertaining to a prior sentencing entry in a direct appeal from a sentencing entry following the revocation of Rogers’s community control), citing State v. Seeley, 3d Dist. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Seeley, Unpublished Decision (4-2-2007)green1 sentence2018Union No. 14-06-38, 2007-Ohio-1538, ¶ 17 (“Any questions concerning the validity of [a prior] entry or matters pertaining [to that entry] should have been raised by direct appeal.”), citing State v. Crutchfield, 3d Dist. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rogersgreen1 sentence2013No. 98059, 2012-Ohio-4598, ¶ 6-9 (“Rogers I”). {¶10} In November 2012, Rogers filed a motion for leave to withdraw his guilty plea with the trial court, arguing that his guilty plea should be vacated because (1) no verdict or finding of his guilt was ever made “in open court” and (2) the trial court erroneously advised him, during the plea colloquy, that he would be subject to a period of postrelease control following the conclusion of his sentence. {¶11} On November 9, 2012, the trial court denied Rogers’s motion without a hearing, concluding that the February 26, 2004 journal entry “confirms | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Roe
green
2 sentences1995However, this court previously rejected this argument in State v. Roe (1989), 41 Ohio St.3d 18, 21 , 535 N.E.2d 1351, 1357 , and held that the statute does not impose a stricter standard. 1995However, this court previously rejected this argument in State v. Roe (1989), 41 Ohio St.3d 18, 21 , 535 N.E.2d 1351, 1357 , and held that the statute does not impose a stricter standard. | 2 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Clark
green
2 sentences2013Because a criminal defendant gives up certain constitutional rights when pleading guilty to a crime, a guilty plea cannot be accepted “unless the defendant is fully informed of the consequences of his or her plea.” Clark, 119 Ohio St.3d 239 , 2008-Ohio-3748 , 893 N.E.2d 462, ¶ 25 . 2013Because a criminal defendant gives up certain constitutional rights when pleading guilty to a crime, a guilty plea cannot be accepted “unless the defendant is fully informed of the consequences of his or her plea.” Clark, 119 Ohio St.3d 239 , 2008-Ohio-3748 , 893 N.E.2d 462, ¶ 25 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.
green
1 sentence2012Co. (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 79 , for the proposition that the four-year statute of limitations began to run on the date of her accident, not the date she obtained her insurance policy. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.