Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1932–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Denson v. Richmond Countygreen2 sentences2022App. 408, 411 , 583 S.E.2d 318, 320 (2003). ¶ 72 We first address the Company’s claim that the trial court should have issued a directed verdict as to Defendant’s claim that the Company performed substandard work on the re-piping and insulation projects. 2022App. 408, 411 , 583 S.E.2d 318, 320 (2003). ¶ 72 We first address the Company’s claim that the trial court should have issued a directed verdict as to Defendant’s claim that the Company performed substandard work on the re-piping and insulation projects. | 2 | 2 |
Krawiec v. Manlygreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Krawiec, 370 N.C. at 613 (“Because we determined that plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim for tortious interference with contract or misappropriation of trade secrets, we necessarily must conclude that plaintiffs also failed to adequately allege that [defendants] committed an unfair or deceptive act or practice [based on those claims].” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Hartman v. WH Odell and Associates, Inc.green1 sentence2021See Hartman, 117 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Kahl v. Smith Plumbing Co.green1 sentence1985See, Kaki v. Smith Plumbing Co., 68 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison
green
2 sentences1990Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison, 305 N.C. 373 , 289 S.E.2d 357 (1982). 1990Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison, 305 N.C. 373 , 289 S.E.2d 357 (1982). | 2 | 1985–1990 |
Rayburn v. . Casualty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1932The authorities are numerous and quite uniform that the acknowledgment in the policy of the receipt of the premium estops the company to test the validity of the policy on the ground of nonpayment of the premium. . . . (p. 318.) Chancellor Kent says (3 Com., 260) : ‘the receipt of the premium in the policy is conclusive of payment and binds the insurer unless there is fraud on the part of the insured.’ ” Rayburn v. Casualty Co., 141 N. C., 425 ; Murphy v. Ins. 1932The authorities are numerous and quite uniform that the acknowledgment in the policy of the receipt of the premium estops the company to test the validity of the policy on the ground of nonpayment of the premium. . . . (p. 318.) Chancellor Kent says (3 Com., 260): `the receipt of the premium in the policy is conclusive of payment and binds the insurer unless there is fraud on the part of the insured.'" Rayburn v. Casualty Co. , 141 N.C. 425 ; Murphy v. Ins. | 2 | 1932–1932 |
Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022HARRISON 2022-NCCOA-27 Opinion of the Court conclusions on whether the contract had been breached. ¶ 70 Following the close of all evidence during a jury trial, a party may move for a directed verdict in order to “test[] the sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict for the non-moving party.” Williams v. CSX Transp., Inc., 176 N.C. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Byers
green
1 sentence1975They concluded that “ . . . the parties intended that only the insured who invokes the protection of the policy should have the obligation to reimburse the company under the clause in question.” 99 N.H. at 457 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Halifax Paper Co. v. Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
green
2 sentences1960The municipalities cite Paper Co. v. Sanitary Dist., 232 N.C. 421 , 61 S.E. 2d 378 (1950) for the proposition that the type of “private” contract at hand has been held; to be outside of the jurisdiction of the Commission. 1960The municipalities cite Paper Co. v. Sanitary Dist., 232 N.C. 421 , 61 S.E. 2d 378 (1950) for the proposition that the type of “private” contract at hand has been held; to be outside of the jurisdiction of the Commission. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.