Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.green2 sentences2024In Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co., Inc., the Court clarified the test to determine when an employer’s conduct rises to the level of an “intentional wrong” under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. 170 N.J. 602, 617 (2002). 2024Co., Inc., 170 N.J. 602, 617 (2002)).] Under that test, “an intentional wrong is not limited to actions taken with a subjective desire to harm, but also includes instances where an employer knows that the consequences of those acts are substantially certain to result in such harm.” Laidlow, 170 N.J. at 613 . | 1 | 1 |
Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2022Co. of America, thusly: [T]he determination whether there exists a genuine issue with respect to a material fact challenged requires the motion judge to consider whether the competent evidential materials presented, when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party in consideration of the applicable evidentiary standard, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of the non-moving party. [ 142 N.J. 520, 523 (1995)]. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2020Eli now argues that the trial judge erred in failing to provide the jury with a sufficient definition of "arrest." He cites the jury instruction provided by the trial court in State v. Brown, 239 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
In re Board's Main Extension Rules N.J.A.C. 14:3-8.1green1 sentence2019See In re Board's Main Extension Rules N.J.A.C. 14:3-8.1, 426 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richardson v. POLICE & F. RET. SYS.
green
2 sentences2024That statute provides for these benefits "if said employee is permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of a traumatic event occurring during and as a result of the performance of his regular or assigned duties." The Court clarified the factors to be analyzed in these matters in Richardson, 192 N.J. at 212-213 , providing guidance to unify the disparate tests that had previously been applied to accidental disability retirement benefits determinations. 2024A PFRSNJ member is entitled to ADRB if the member is permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of a traumatic event occurring during and as a result of the performance of his regular or assigned duties and that such disability was not the result of the member's willful negligence and that such member is mentally or physically incapacitated for the performance of his usual duty and of any other available duty in the department which his employer is willing to assign to him. [N.J.S.A. 43:16A-7(a)(1).] The Court clarified the factors for our consideration of this analysis in Richardson, | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Sugar
green
1 sentence2018In Sugar II, the Court held that for purposes of the New Jersey Constitution, evidence that would otherwise be subject to the exclusionary rule may be admitted if the State establishes by clear and convincing evidence that: (1) proper, normal, and specific investigatory procedures would have been pursued in order to A-4606-15T4 6 complete the investigation of the case; (2) under all of the surrounding relevant circumstances the pursuit of those procedures would have inevitably resulted in the discovery of the evidence; and (3) the discovery of the evidence through the use of such procedures wo | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Taylor v. Metzger
green
2 sentences2004Further, the Court clarified the test for an intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action as set forth in Buckley, id. at 508-09 , 706 A.2d 685 , and found that the plaintiffs evidence was sufficient to support that cause of action as well, id. at 521 , 706 A.2d 685 . 2004Further, the Court clarified the test for an intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action as set forth in Buckley, id. at 508-09 , 706 A.2d 685 , and found that the plaintiffs evidence was sufficient to support that cause of action as well, id. at 521 , 706 A.2d 685 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board
green
2 sentences2001Ibid. 2001Ibid. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.