Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Antonius v. King Countygreen2 sentences2009See Antonius, 153 Wn.2d at 261-69 . ¶43 Adopting the Morgan analysis, the Antonius court concludedthatwhereadiscreteactofdiscriminationisalleged, the limitations period runs from the act. 2009See Antonius, 153 Wn.2d at 261-69 . ¶43 Adopting the Morgan analysis, the Antonius court concludedthatwhereadiscreteactofdiscriminationisalleged, the limitations period runs from the act. | 1 | 2 |
Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'ngreen2 sentences2005In contrast, in Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'n, 830 A.2d 874, 892 (D.C.Ct.App.2003), the court reasoned that under Morgan's analysis "even if there are significant gaps in the occurrence of the acts constituting the unitary hostile work environment claim, the filing of that claim still may be timely." The court reasoned that this is true because the acts constituting a hostile work environment are treated as an indivisible whole. 2005Lively, 830 A.2d at 892 . | 1 | 2 |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgangreen1 sentence2004Morgan, 536 U.S. at 121 (O’Connor, J., concurring at 123, 127). ¶15 In applying Morgan’s analysis to this case, the Court of Appeals concluded that Antonius presented sufficient evidence of one or more acts of harassment within three years of her suit filed in December of 2000, and therefore the trial court could consider the discriminatory conduct occurring throughout the time the acts constituting a hostile work environment occurred, i.e., acts occurring before December 1997. | 1 | 1 |
Martini v. Boeing Co.green1 sentence2004E.g., Martini, 137 Wn.2d at 372-75 (declining to follow federal cases on question whether back pay is recoverable in a successful discrimination action without a showing of constructive discharge). ¶20 The County argues, though, that state and federal law are too dissimilar to apply Morgan’s analysis under chapter 49.60 RCW. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2011Moore, 50 Cal.4th at 825-26 , 114 Cal.Rptr.3d 199 , 237 P.3d 530 . ¶ 29 The Moore court's reasoning highlights the tension between Morgan's claim to competency and the SVP civil commitment requirements. 2011Moore, 50 Cal.4th at 825-26 , 114 Cal.Rptr.3d 199 , 237 P.3d 530 . ¶ 29 The Moore court's reasoning highlights the tension between Morgan's claim to competency and the SVP civil commitment requirements. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2005A person has the right to hold employment without discrimination, RCW 49.60.030(a), and the discrimination statutes embody "public policy of `the highest priority' " Xieng, 120 Wash.2d at 521 , 844 P.2d 389 (quoting Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle, 118 Wash.2d 79, 86 , 821 P.2d 34 (1991)). 2005A person has the right to hold employment without discrimination, RCW 49.60.030(a), and the discrimination statutes embody "public policy of `the highest priority' " Xieng, 120 Wash.2d at 521 , 844 P.2d 389 (quoting Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle, 118 Wash.2d 79, 86 , 821 P.2d 34 (1991)). | 2 | 2004–2005 |
Xieng v. Peoples National Bank
green
2 sentences2005A person has the right to hold employment without discrimination, RCW 49.60.030(a), and the discrimination statutes embody "public policy of `the highest priority' " Xieng, 120 Wash.2d at 521 , 844 P.2d 389 (quoting Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle, 118 Wash.2d 79, 86 , 821 P.2d 34 (1991)). 2005A person has the right to hold employment without discrimination, RCW 49.60.030(a), and the discrimination statutes embody "public policy of `the highest priority' " Xieng, 120 Wash.2d at 521 , 844 P.2d 389 (quoting Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle, 118 Wash.2d 79, 86 , 821 P.2d 34 (1991)). | 2 | 2004–2005 |
William L. Lucas v. Chicago Transit Authority
green
2 sentences2005Lucas, 367 F.3d at 727 . 2004Lucas, 367 F.3d at 727 . | 2 | 2004–2005 |
State v. Hills
neutral
2 sentences2005Antonius, No. 50492-4-I, 118 Wash.App. 1011 , 2003 WL 21958392 , slip op. at 5-6. 2004Antonius , noted at 118 Wn. | 2 | 2004–2005 |
Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy
green
1 sentence2020Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy, 165 Wn.2d 595, 601 , 200 P.3d 695 (2009). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy
green
1 sentence2020Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy, 165 Wn.2d 595, 601 , 200 P.3d 695 (2009). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Morgan
green
1 sentence2018Morgan, 86 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence2015See RAP 10.10(c) (an appellate court will not consider an argument made in a statement of additional grounds for review if it does not inform the court of the nature and occurrence of the alleged errors); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 559 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence2015See RAP 10.10(c) (an appellate court will not consider an argument made in a statement of additional grounds for review if it does not inform the court of the nature and occurrence of the alleged errors); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 559 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.