search requirement (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

search requirement in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Nast v. Michelsgreen
wash · 1986 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Nast v. Michels, 107 Wn.2d 300, 308 , 730 P.2d 54 (1986) (“[A]n appellate court may sustain a trial court on any correct ground, even though that ground was not considered by the trial court.”).

2009Nast v. Michels, 107 Wn.2d 300, 308 , 730 P.2d 54 (1986) (“[A]n appellate court may sustain a trial court on any correct ground, even though that ground was not considered by the trial court.”).

22
State v. Lohrgreen
washctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Lohr, 164 Wn.

11
Altshuler v. City of Seattlegreen
washctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000See RAP 13.7(b) ("If the Supreme Court reverses a decision of the Court of Appeals that did not consider all of the issues raised which might support that decision, the Supreme Court will either consider and decide those issues or remand the case to the Court of Appeals to decide those issues."). [8] Staats does not challenge state qualified immunity under RCW 4.92.090 which provides the State of Washington "shall be liable for damages arising out of its tortious conduct to the same extent as if it were a private person or corporation." [9] To the extent Altshuler v. City of Seattle, 63 Wash.A

2000See RAP 13.7(b) ("If the Supreme Court reverses a decision of the Court of Appeals that did not consider all of the issues raised which might support that decision, the Supreme Court will either consider and decide those issues or remand the case to the Court of Appeals to decide those issues."). [8] Staats does not challenge state qualified immunity under RCW 4.92.090 which provides the State of Washington "shall be liable for damages arising out of its tortious conduct to the same extent as if it were a private person or corporation." [9] To the extent Altshuler v. City of Seattle, 63 Wash.A

11
Anthony Paul Marullo v. United Statesgreen
ca5 · 1964 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
1 sentence

1981Marullo v. United States, 328 F.2d 361, 363 (5th Cir.1964). [4] Consequently, we hold that the officers' actions in peering in the curtained window of a private residence constituted a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Walker green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2021State v. Walker, 136 Wn.2d 678, 682 , 965 P.2d 1079 (1998).

12021–2021
State v. Walker green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2021State v. Walker, 136 Wn.2d 678, 682 , 965 P.2d 1079 (1998).

12021–2021
State v. Smith green
wash · 2013
1 sentence

2013Id. at 542 n.2.

12013–2013
Jones v. United States red
scotus · 1960
2 sentences

1992NOTES [1] Shortly before Simpson the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 (1980) abolished the automatic standing doctrine as a federal constitutional requirement. [2] When the Court developed the automatic standing doctrine in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R.2d 233 (1960), it did not state clearly whether the defendant's possession at the time of the search was a requirement for automatic standing.

1992NOTES [1] Shortly before Simpson the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 (1980) abolished the automatic standing doctrine as a federal constitutional requirement. [2] When the Court developed the automatic standing doctrine in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R.2d 233 (1960), it did not state clearly whether the defendant's possession at the time of the search was a requirement for automatic standing.

11992–1992
Brown v. United States green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1992Later, in Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 (1973), the Court indicated that possession at the time of the search was necessary for automatic standing. 3 W.

1992Later, in Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 (1973), the Court indicated that possession at the time of the search was necessary for automatic standing. 3 W.

11992–1992
United States v. Salvucci green
scotus · 1980
2 sentences

1992NOTES [1] Shortly before Simpson the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 (1980) abolished the automatic standing doctrine as a federal constitutional requirement. [2] When the Court developed the automatic standing doctrine in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R.2d 233 (1960), it did not state clearly whether the defendant's possession at the time of the search was a requirement for automatic standing.

1992NOTES [1] Shortly before Simpson the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 (1980) abolished the automatic standing doctrine as a federal constitutional requirement. [2] When the Court developed the automatic standing doctrine in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R.2d 233 (1960), it did not state clearly whether the defendant's possession at the time of the search was a requirement for automatic standing.

11992–1992
White v. White green
wash · 1945
2 sentences

1984White v. White, 24 Wn.2d 52 , 163 P.2d 137 (1945); Chase v. Carney, 199 Wash. 99 , 90 P.2d 286 (1939).

1984White v. White, 24 Wn.2d 52 , 163 P.2d 137 (1945); Chase v. Carney, 199 Wash. 99 , 90 P.2d 286 (1939).

11984–1984
Chase v. Carney green
wash · 1939
2 sentences

1984White v. White, 24 Wn.2d 52 , 163 P.2d 137 (1945); Chase v. Carney, 199 Wash. 99 , 90 P.2d 286 (1939).

1984White v. White, 24 Wn.2d 52 , 163 P.2d 137 (1945); Chase v. Carney, 199 Wash. 99 , 90 P.2d 286 (1939).

11984–1984

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 63 (1961–2025) IL 37 (1878–2021) TX 34 (1927–2024) NY 26 (1872–2025) MA 19 (1983–2018) OH 18 (1987–2021) GA 16 (1937–2020) AL 15 (1954–1989) PA 15 (1987–2025) IN 13 (1968–2024) NJ 13 (1957–2025) MI 13 (1964–2021) AR 13 (1986–2024) FL 12 (1987–2024) OR 12 (1943–2024) OK 12 (1942–1999) MO 11 (1924–2018) ND 10 (1983–2026) MN 9 (1965–2024) WA 9 (1981–2021) AZ 9 (1977–2023) ID 9 (1927–2024) MD 8 (1992–2016) CT 8 (1983–2015) MT 7 (1978–2015) IA 7 (1972–2024) NM 6 (1939–2013) VA 6 (1965–2025) MS 6 (1961–2025) TN 6 (1973–2021) LA 6 (1975–2025) WI 6 (1996–2023) UT 5 (1991–2021) NE 5 (1982–2020) KY 5 (1924–2020) NC 5 (2007–2020) WY 4 (1975–2013) DC 4 (1980–2008) VT 4 (1991–2025) SD 4 (1971–2017) CO 4 (1990–2024) KS 3 (2018–2025) HI 3 (1980–2016) VI 2 (1977–1998) NH 2 (1951–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check