64 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Manussiergreen2 sentences2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). 2013Restraint of Matteson. 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that "there are no material differences between the 'nearly identical' federal and state provisions," and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier. 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) ("The [State v.] Gunwallf. 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution."). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Manussiergreen2 sentences2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). 2013Restraint of Matteson. 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that "there are no material differences between the 'nearly identical' federal and state provisions," and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier. 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) ("The [State v.] Gunwallf. 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution."). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Fortunegreen2 sentences2008See State v. Fortune, 128 Wn.2d 464, 475 , 909 P.2d 930 (1996) (in absence of argument, we will construe the state due process clause consistently with the federal due process clause). 2008See State v. Fortune, 128 Wash.2d 464, 475 , 909 P.2d 930 (1996) (in absence of argument, we will construe the state due process clause consistently with the federal due process clause). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Fortunegreen2 sentences2008See State v. Fortune, 128 Wn.2d 464, 475 , 909 P.2d 930 (1996) (in absence of argument, we will construe the state due process clause consistently with the federal due process clause). 2008See State v. Fortune, 128 Wash.2d 464, 475 , 909 P.2d 930 (1996) (in absence of argument, we will construe the state due process clause consistently with the federal due process clause). | 2 | 2 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Dyergreen2 sentences2018Jordan, 180 Wn.2d at 462 ; In re Dyer, 143 Wn.2d at 394 . 2013Restraint of Dyer, 143 Wn.2d 384, 394 , 20 P.3d 907 (2001) ("Washington's due process clause does not afford a broader due process protection than the Fourteenth Amendment"); In re Pers. | 1 | 2 |
cluster 19816green2 sentences2002Alenco Communications et al. v. F.C.C., 201 F.3d 608, 620 (5th Cir.2000). [21] Because exclusive ETC status is not a protected interest entitling the WITA companies to procedural due process under federal law, WITA's claim of denial of due process fails, and we need not reach the second (procedural) step in the federal due process analysis. 2002Alenco Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 201 F.3d 608 , 620 (5th Cir. 2000). 21 Because exclusive ETC status is not a protected interest entitling the WITA companies to procedural due process under federal law, WITA’s claim of denial of due process fails, and we need not reach the second (procedural) step in the federal due process analysis. | 1 | 2 |
| Pruczinski v. Ashbygreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. LG Electronics, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Certification From the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Ockletree v. Franciscan Health Systemgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Washington v. Harpergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Herzoggreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Dyergreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Salernogreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Plowmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| City of Seattle v. Huffgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. $250,000 in United States Currency, (Two Cases) Appeal of Amador Rodriguez-Ramos (Two Cases)green | 1 | 1 |
| No. 74--3074green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2008App. at 506-07 . ¶22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. 5 ¶23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wn.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wn. 2008Spurgeon, 63 Wash.App. at 506-07 , 820 P.2d 960 . ¶ 22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. [5] ¶ 23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wash.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wash.App. 600 , 686 P.2d 1143 (1984), and the dissenting opinion in State v. Ortiz, 119 Wash.2d 294 , | 5 | 1988–2024 |
Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines
green
2 sentences2016Washington courts may “assert personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the extent permitted by the federal due process clause.” Id. (citing Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 113 Wn.2d 763, 766-67 , 783 P.2d 78 (1989); U.S. Const. amend. 2016Washington courts may “assert personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the extent permitted by the federal due process clause.” Id. (citing Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 113 Wn.2d 763, 766-67 , 783 P.2d 78 (1989); U.S. Const. amend. | 5 | 2014–2016 |
State v. Irby
green
2 sentences2018State v. Irby, 170 Wn.2d 874 , 885 n.6, 246 P.3d 11 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. 2018State v. Irby, 170 Wn.2d 874 , 885 n.6, 246 P.3d 11 State V. | 3 | 2015–2018 |
State v. Gunwall
green
2 sentences2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). 2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). | 3 | 1992–2013 |
Withrow v. Larkin
green
2 sentences2007Both Chamberlin and the ACLU, in essence, are advocating for a rule of automatic recusal of any judge from hearing a challenge to a search warrant he or she issues. ¶12 The right to a fair hearing under the federal due process clause prohibits actual bias and “ ‘the probability of unfairness.’ ” Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 47 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L. 2007Both Chamberlin and the ACLU, in essence, are advocating for a rule of automatic recusal of any judge from hearing a challenge to a search warrant he or she issues. ¶12 The right to a fair hearing under the federal due process clause prohibits actual bias and “ ‘the probability of unfairness.’ ” Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 47 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L. | 3 | 2007–2013 |
State v. Bartholomew
green
2 sentences2008App. at 506-07 . ¶22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. 5 ¶23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wn.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wn. 2008App. at 506-07 . ¶22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. 5 ¶23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wn.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wn. | 3 | 1988–2008 |
State ex rel. Pizza v. Rezcallah
green
2 sentences2000Pizza, 702 N.E.2d at 93 . 2000Pizza, 702 N.E.2d at 93 . | 3 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Jordan
green
2 sentences2021In re Dependency of E.H., 191 Wn.2d 872 , 887, 427 P.3d 587 (2018) (plurality opinion); State v. Jordan, 180 Wn.2d 456, 462 , 325 P.3d 181 (2014); In re Personal Restraint of Rhome, 43 No. 37467-0-III Stevens County v. Stevens County Sheriff’s Office (dissent) 172 Wn.2d 654 , 665 n.3, 260 P.3d 874 (2011). 2021In re Dependency of E.H., 191 Wn.2d 872 , 887, 427 P.3d 587 (2018) (plurality opinion); State v. Jordan, 180 Wn.2d 456, 462 , 325 P.3d 181 (2014); In re Personal Restraint of Rhome, 43 No. 37467-0-III Stevens County v. Stevens County Sheriff’s Office (dissent) 172 Wn.2d 654 , 665 n.3, 260 P.3d 874 (2011). | 2 | 2018–2021 |
Perry v. New Hampshire
green
2 sentences2018Perry, 565 U.S. at 244 . 2015Haffs position is foreclosed by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Perry v. New Hampshire, _ U.S. _, 132 S. Ct. 716 , 181 L. | 2 | 2015–2018 |
Personal Restraint Petition Of Matthew Ray Douglas Schley
green
2 sentences2018Restraint of Schley , 197 Wash. App. 862 , 871, 392 P.3d 1099 (quoting Grisby v. Herzog , 190 Wash. App. 786 , 811, 362 P.3d 763 (2015) ), review granted , 189 Wash.2d 1001 , 403 P.3d 38 (2017). 2018Restraint of Schley , 197 Wash. App. 862 , 871, 392 P.3d 1099 (quoting Grisby v. Herzog , 190 Wash. App. 786 , 811, 362 P.3d 763 (2015) ), review granted , 189 Wash.2d 1001 , 403 P.3d 38 (2017). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Daimler AG v. Bauman
green
2 sentences2016Daimler AG v. Bauman, _ U.S. _, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754 , 187 L. 2016Daimler AG v. Bauman, _ U.S. _, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754 , 187 L. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
State v. AU Optronics Corp.
green
2 sentences2015McIntyre and that Grange Insurance Ass’n “predates the United States Supreme Court’s more recent interpretations of the federal due process clause.” AU Optronics, 180 Wn. 2015Mclntvre, and that Grange "predates the United States Supreme Court's more recent interpretations of the federal due process clause." AU Optronics, 180 Wn. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Matteson
green
2 sentences2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). 2013Restraint of Matteson. 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that "there are no material differences between the 'nearly identical' federal and state provisions," and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier. 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) ("The [State v.] Gunwallf. 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution."). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Matteson
green
2 sentences2013Restraint of Matteson, 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that “there are no material differences between the ‘nearly identical’ federal and state provisions” and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (“The [State u.] Gunwall[, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution”). 2013Restraint of Matteson. 142 Wn.2d 298, 310 , 12 P.3d 585 (2000) (determining that "there are no material differences between the 'nearly identical' federal and state provisions," and, thus, that the state due process clause does not provide greater protection than the federal due process clause); State v. Manussier. 129 Wn.2d 652, 679 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) ("The [State v.] Gunwallf. 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986)] factors do not favor an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the state constitution."). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Messer v. State
green
2 sentences2009Second, Messer v. State, 2006 WY 141 , 145 P.3d 457 relies exclusively on Kupec v. State, 835 P.2d 359 (Wyo. 1992), another case cited by McCormick. 2009Second, Messer v. State, 2006 WY 141 , 145 P.3d 457 relies exclusively on Kupec v. State, 835 P.2d 359 (Wyo. 1992), another case cited by McCormick. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Kupec v. State
green
2 sentences2009Second, Messer v. State, 2006 WY 141 , 145 P.3d 457 relies exclusively on Kupec v. State, 835 P.2d 359 (Wyo.1992), another case cited by McCormick. 2009Second, Messer v. State, 2006 WY 141 , 145 P.3d 457 relies exclusively on Kupec v. State, 835 P.2d 359 (Wyo. 1992), another case cited by McCormick. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Williamson
green
2 sentences2009First, McCormick's citations to People v. Zaring, 8 Cal.App.4th 362 , 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 263 (1992); Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314 (1996); and State v. Williamson, 61 N.C.App. 531 , 301 S.E.2d 423 (1983), are unhelpful because in none of those cases was the court analyzing whether the federal due process clause required the finding of willfulness. 2009App. 531 , 301 S.E.2d 423 (1983), are unhelpful because in none of those cases was the court analyzing whether the federal due process clause required the finding of willfulness. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Washington v. Glucksberg
green
2 sentences2008Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720 , 117 S. Ct. 2258 , 117 S. Ct. 2302 , 138 L. 2008Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720 , 117 S. Ct. 2258 , 117 S. Ct. 2302 , 138 L. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences2008Spurgeon, 63 Wash.App. at 506-07 , 820 P.2d 960 . ¶ 22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. [5] ¶ 23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wash.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wash.App. 600 , 686 P.2d 1143 (1984), and the dissenting opinion in State v. Ortiz, 119 Wash.2d 294 , 2008Spurgeon, 63 Wash.App. at 506-07 , 820 P.2d 960 . ¶ 22 Turner argues that analysis of the fourth factor, preexisting state law, and the sixth factor, matters of particular state concern, support reaching a different result. [5] ¶ 23 As to the fourth factor, the only authority Turner cites in support of his argument that the state due process clause provides greater protection than the federal due process clause is State v. Bartholomew, 101 Wash.2d 631 , 683 P.2d 1079 (1984), State v. Davis, 38 Wash.App. 600 , 686 P.2d 1143 (1984), and the dissenting opinion in State v. Ortiz, 119 Wash.2d 294 , | 2 | 2008–2008 |
In Re Murchison.
green
2 sentences2007Both Chamberlin and the ACLU, in essence, are advocating for a rule of automatic recusal of any judge from hearing a challenge to a search warrant he or she issues. ¶ 12 The right to a fair hearing under the federal due process clause prohibits actual bias and "`the probability of unfairness.'" Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 47 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 43 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975) (quoting In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955)). 2007Both Chamberlin and the ACLU, in essence, are advocating for a rule of automatic recusal of any judge from hearing a challenge to a search warrant he or she issues. ¶ 12 The right to a fair hearing under the federal due process clause prohibits actual bias and "`the probability of unfairness.'" Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 47 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 43 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975) (quoting In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955)). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
green
2 sentences2006Goodridge, 440 Mass. at 328-29 , 328 n. 18, 798 N.E.2d 941 . *980 Rational Basis Review ś 56 Plaintiffs have not established that gay and lesbian persons constitute a suspect class or that the fundamental right to marry includes the right to same-sex marriage. 2006Goodridge, 440 Mass. at 328-29 , 328 n.18. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Myers
green
2 sentences2004Myers, 105 Wn.2d at 266-67 . 2004Myers, 105 *227 Wash.2d at 266-67, 714 P.2d 303 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2004Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 , 70 S. Ct. 652 , 94 L. 2004Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 , 70 S. Ct. 652 , 94 L. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Beaver
green
2 sentences2024State v. Beaver, 184 Wn.2d 321, 331 , 358 P.3d 385 (2015). 2024State v. Beaver, 184 Wn.2d 321, 331 , 358 P.3d 385 (2015). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| In re Dependency of E.H. green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| In Re the Personal Restraint of Rhome green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| Department of Social & Health Services v. Luak green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps. green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Crescent Convalescent Center v. Department of Social & Health Services green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Bellevue School Dist. v. Es green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State Of Washington v. Robert Lee Tyler green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Centimark Corp. v. Department of Labor & Industries green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Failla v. FixtureOne Corp. green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Crockett v. Jones green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| State v. Bartholomew green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Mapp v. Ohio green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| State v. Irby green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Zant v. Stephens green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| United States v. Allied Oil Corp. green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| State v. Chamberlin green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.