lengthy hearing in Kansas

2019After a lengthy analysis of the officer's questioning and determining if the officer had reasonable suspicion, the Supreme Court found the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain further and that his actions were lawful. 308 Kan. at 356 , 419 P.3d 1164 .

2018The court ultimately held that the amendment to the statutory definition of manifest injustice did not apply retroactively. 308 Kan. at 503 , 421 P.3d 718 .

2016After a lengthy analysis, the court determined that the correct test to determine whether the legislature overstepped its bounds was the same test used to address Section 18 challenges, commonly called the quid pro quo test. 295 Kan. at 648-53 .

2014Suffice it to say that Descamps reit erated the concept that judicial factfinding that increases the maximum sentence “raisejs] serious Sixth Amendment concerns if it [goes] beyond merely identifying a prior conviction.” 133 S. Ct. at 2288 .

1974A. 2d 768, 328 P. 2d 853 ], where it was held: “ ‘Courts of this state, by invoking the doctrine of “clean hands,” will recognize and enforce custody decrees of a sister state, without reexamination of their merits and regardless of a change of conditions, where there is misconduct or malfeasance on the part of the parent seeking such reexamination.’ (Syl. ¶ 6.)” (pp. 577, 578.) As gleaned from this record the facts fall neatly within the pattern outlined in Perrenoud : After a lengthy hearing of the Anderson divorce case, in which the custody of Anna was obviously litigated, the Minnesota tri

1957In In re Heilman, 176 Kan. 5 , 269 P. 2d 459 (cert. denied 348 U. S. 944 , 99 L. ed. 739, 75 S. Ct. 366 ), we upheld the findings and recommendation of the commissioner, our opinion being filed on April 10, 1954.

1957In In re Heilman, 176 Kan. 5 , 269 P. 2d 459 (cert. denied 348 U. S. 944 , 99 L. ed. 739, 75 S. Ct. 366 ), we upheld the findings and recommendation of the commissioner, our opinion being filed on April 10, 1954.

1957In In re Heilman, 176 Kan. 5 , 269 P. 2d 459 (cert. denied 348 U. S. 944 , 99 L. ed. 739, 75 S. Ct. 366 ), we upheld the findings and recommendation of the commissioner, our opinion being filed on April 10, 1954.

1957In In re Heilman, 176 Kan. 5 , 269 P. 2d 459 (cert. denied 348 U. S. 944 , 99 L. ed. 739, 75 S. Ct. 366 ), we upheld the findings and recommendation of the commissioner, our opinion being filed on April 10, 1954.

1928Thus in State, ex rel., v. Telephone Co., 115 Kan. 236 , 223 Pac. 771 , where a schedule of telephone rates promulgated by the public utilities commission had been enjoined by the district court after a lengthy hearing before a referee, the cause was brought to this court for review, and we were constrained to say: “The public utilities commission argues that this court is not bound by the facts found by the trial court, but may examine the evidence to determine the weight and sufficiency thereof and find other facts different from those found by the trial court, as this court may conclude are

1928Thus in State, ex rel., v. Telephone Co., 115 Kan. 236 , 223 Pac. 771 , where a schedule of telephone rates promulgated by the public utilities commission had been enjoined by the district court after a lengthy hearing before a referee, the cause was brought to this court for review, and we were constrained to say: “The public utilities commission argues that this court is not bound by the facts found by the trial court, but may examine the evidence to determine the weight and sufficiency thereof and find other facts different from those found by the trial court, as this court may conclude are