Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2020In Beaumont v Brown, 401 Mich 80, 99, 102, 104-105 ; 257 NW2d 522 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v Saranac Community Sch Bd of Ed, 455 Mich 285 ; 565 NW2d 650 (1997),2 our Supreme Court engaged in a lengthy analysis of the appropriate standard to apply in defining the nature of the “publicity” necessary to show an unlawful public disclosure of embarrassing private facts, concluding that establishing this tort required “unnecessary publicity” or “an unreasonable and serious interference with the plaintiff’s interest in not having his affairs known to others.” (Quotation m 2020In Beaumont v Brown, 401 Mich 80, 99, 102, 104-105 ; 257 NW2d 522 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v Saranac Community Sch Bd of Ed, 455 Mich 285 ; 565 NW2d 650 (1997),2 our Supreme Court engaged in a lengthy analysis of the appropriate standard to apply in defining the nature of the “publicity” necessary to show an unlawful public disclosure of embarrassing private facts, concluding that establishing this tort required “unnecessary publicity” or “an unreasonable and serious interference with the plaintiff’s interest in not having his affairs known to others.” (Quotation m | 1 | 1 |
Beaumont v. Brownred2 sentences2020In Beaumont v Brown, 401 Mich 80, 99, 102, 104-105 ; 257 NW2d 522 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v Saranac Community Sch Bd of Ed, 455 Mich 285 ; 565 NW2d 650 (1997),2 our Supreme Court engaged in a lengthy analysis of the appropriate standard to apply in defining the nature of the “publicity” necessary to show an unlawful public disclosure of embarrassing private facts, concluding that establishing this tort required “unnecessary publicity” or “an unreasonable and serious interference with the plaintiff’s interest in not having his affairs known to others.” (Quotation m 2020In Beaumont v Brown, 401 Mich 80, 99, 102, 104-105 ; 257 NW2d 522 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v Saranac Community Sch Bd of Ed, 455 Mich 285 ; 565 NW2d 650 (1997),2 our Supreme Court engaged in a lengthy analysis of the appropriate standard to apply in defining the nature of the “publicity” necessary to show an unlawful public disclosure of embarrassing private facts, concluding that establishing this tort required “unnecessary publicity” or “an unreasonable and serious interference with the plaintiff’s interest in not having his affairs known to others.” (Quotation m | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. United States
red
2 sentences2022The majority, in a lengthy analysis of the history of the rule, determined that language extending the benefit of prejudice-weighing to the “defendant” was intended to new effect-of-adoption provision became effective on the same day, January 1, 1975. 1974 PA 266 ; 1974 PA 296 . 5 Compare Chapman v United States, 500 US 453, 454 ; 111 S Ct 1919 ; 114 L Ed 2d 524 (1991), in which the Supreme Court declined to apply the absurd-results doctrine to a statute that imposed a mandatory minimum sentence for distributing more than one gram of a “mixture or substance” containing LSD. 2022The majority, in a lengthy analysis of the history of the rule, determined that language extending the benefit of prejudice-weighing to the “defendant” was intended to new effect-of-adoption provision became effective on the same day, January 1, 1975. 1974 PA 266 ; 1974 PA 296 . 5 Compare Chapman v United States, 500 US 453, 454 ; 111 S Ct 1919 ; 114 L Ed 2d 524 (1991), in which the Supreme Court declined to apply the absurd-results doctrine to a statute that imposed a mandatory minimum sentence for distributing more than one gram of a “mixture or substance” containing LSD. | 3 | 2022–2022 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2020Because the United States Supreme Court in Miller v Alabama, 567 US 460 ; 132 S Ct. 2455; 183 L Ed2d 407 (2012), held unconstitutional the imposition of mandatory LWOP sentences on juveniles, the circuit court held a lengthy hearing on September 19, 2018. 2020On May 11, 1977, the trial court sentenced defendant to life without parole (LWOP) for both offenses.1 Because the United States Supreme Court in Miller v Alabama, 567 US 460 ; 132 S Ct. 2455; 183 L Ed2d 407 (2012), held unconstitutional the imposition of mandatory LWOP sentences on juveniles, the circuit court held a lengthy hearing on September 19, 2018. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Derderian v. Genesys Health Care Systems
green
2 sentences2026“When an appellant fails to dispute the basis of the trial court’s ruling, this Court need not even consider granting plaintiffs the relief they seek.” Derderian v Genesys Health Care Sys, 263 Mich App 364, 381 ; 689 NW2d 145 (2004) (quotation marks, citation, and alteration omitted). 2026“When an appellant fails to dispute the basis of the trial court’s ruling, this Court need not even consider granting plaintiffs the relief they seek.” Derderian v Genesys Health Care Sys, 263 Mich App 364, 381 ; 689 NW2d 145 (2004) (quotation marks, citation, and alteration omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Rafferty v. Markovitz
green
2 sentences2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. 2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Olson v. Olson
green
2 sentences2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. 2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Howard v. Canteen Corp.
red
2 sentences2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. 2025If any of the underlying facts, such as the number of hours spent in preparation, are in dispute, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding the disputed issues. [Olson v Olson, 256 Mich App 619, 636 ; 671 NW2d 64 (2003), quoting Howard v Canteen Corp, 192 Mich App 427, 437-438 ; 481 NW2d 718 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Rafferty v Markovitz, 461 Mich 265 ; 602 NW2d 367 (1999) (ellipses and alterations in Olson).] Here, the Special Master did exactly that; he conducted a lengthy hearing during which several witnesses were placed under oath. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Vansickle
green
2 sentences2024In resolving defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s ruling on that matter, “[w]e review de novo as a matter of law whether the police entrapped a defendant, but the trial court’s specific findings of fact are reviewed for clear error.” People v Vansickle, 303 Mich App 111, 114 ; 842 NW2d 289 (2013). 2024In resolving defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s ruling on that matter, “[w]e review de novo as a matter of law whether the police entrapped a defendant, but the trial court’s specific findings of fact are reviewed for clear error.” People v Vansickle, 303 Mich App 111, 114 ; 842 NW2d 289 (2013). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Shade v. Wright
green
2 sentences2018After review of these confidential records, this Court concludes that the trial court's finding was not against the great weight of the evidence because the facts do not "clearly preponderate in the opposite direction." Shade , 291 Mich. App. at 21 , 805 N.W.2d 1 . 2018After review of these confidential records, this Court concludes that the trial court's finding was not against the great weight of the evidence because the facts do not "clearly preponderate in the opposite direction." Shade , 291 Mich. App. at 21 , 805 N.W.2d 1 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Florida v. Jardines
green
1 sentence2015And they gathered that information by physically entering and occupying the area to engage in conduct not explicitly or implicitly permitted by the homeowner. [Id. at_; 133 S Ct at 1414 .] The United States Supreme Court then went on, however, to engage in a lengthy analysis of whether Jardines had “given his leave” for the police and the dog to be on his front porch. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Callington
green
1 sentence2014In Callington, 123 Mich App at 306 , this Court determined that a prosecutor’s remarks to the trial court, in the presence of a defense witness, that he intended to possibly charge the witness with a new offense or to institute probation violation proceedings that could result in a life sentence, were intimidating and, combined with a lengthy warning to the witness by the trial court, effectively drove the witness from the witness stand. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Marble
green
2 sentences1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. [12] In People v Marble, 38 Mich 117 (1878), defendant wife aided and abetted an assault upon her husband and the murder of the husband's companion. 1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. [12] In People v Marble, 38 Mich 117 (1878), defendant wife aided and abetted an assault upon her husband and the murder of the husband's companion. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Watkins v. Plummer
green
2 sentences1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. [12] In People v Marble, 38 Mich 117 (1878), defendant wife aided and abetted an assault upon her husband and the murder of the husband's companion. 1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
People v. Quanstrom
neutral
2 sentences1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. [12] In People v Marble, 38 Mich 117 (1878), defendant wife aided and abetted an assault upon her husband and the murder of the husband's companion. 1986In response to People v Quanstrom, 93 Mich 254 ; 53 NW 165 (1892), prosecutions for bigamy were excepted by 1897 PA 212 . 1915 PA 314 , ch xvii, § 67, added suits for divorce. 1939 PA 82 added an exception for crimes committed against the children of either or both spouses. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.