9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pendergrass v. Stategreen1 sentence2011Moreover, in Pendergrass v. State, our Supreme Court, engaging in a lengthy analysis of Crawford and its progeny, noted that “[i]f the chief mechanism for ensuring reliability of evidence is to be cross-examination, Pendergrass had the benefit here.” 913 N.E.2d 703, 708 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
De Puy Inc. v. Biomedical Engineering Trustgreen1 sentence2009In De Puy Inc. v. Biomedical - Emgineering - Trust, 216 F.Supp.2d 358, 372-78 (D.N.J.2001), an exchange during the pretrial conference between the court and counsel for both parties exemplifies a trial court's concern about parties raising a Daubert issue for the first time in the midst of trial: [Appellee's Counsell: I may have to bring my expert [Shanley], but I don't understand- COURT: If he's going to bring his expert, do I have a Daubert situation? [Appellant's Counsel]: No. The parties were further instructed: COURT: My point is I want to be able to look at these issues ahead of time. | 1 | 1 |
Spranger v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Spranger v. State, 650 N.E.2d 1117, 1119 (Ind.1995). 2001Spranger v. State, 650 N.E.2d 1117, 1119 (Ind.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Emerson v. Stategreen2 sentences2001In Emerson v. State, 724 N.E.2d 605, 609 (Ind.2000), reh’g denied, our Supreme Court held that a trial court did not err when it refused to give the defendant’s lengthy instruction regarding eyewitness credibility. 7 Instead, the Emerson court stated that, in Indiana, specific instructions on eyewitness testimony have been rejected in favor of general witness credibility instructions. 2001Id. at 608 . | 1 | 1 |
Fry v. Stategreen1 sentence2000(R. at 77-79.) A substantially similar instruction was tendered in Fry v. State, 447 N.E.2d 569, 572-73 (Ind.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beasley v. United States
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 463 (citing, among other things, Beasley v. United States , 81 F.Supp. 518 (E.D.S.C. 1948), which found that the "relationship of husband and wife and of parents and child are so closely and intimately connected that I think it fair to impute to the mother the knowledge and contributory negligence of the father"; the Gillam Court also concluded that "under Indiana law, contributory negligence by [mother] would bar the recovery in the suit brought by her husband for loss of [their child's] services and medical expenses"). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
cluster 266861
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 463 (citing, among other things, Beasley v. United States , 81 F.Supp. 518 (E.D.S.C. 1948), which found that the "relationship of husband and wife and of parents and child are so closely and intimately connected that I think it fair to impute to the mother the knowledge and contributory negligence of the father"; the Gillam Court also concluded that "under Indiana law, contributory negligence by [mother] would bar the recovery in the suit brought by her husband for loss of [their child's] services and medical expenses"). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Simmons v. State
green
1 sentence2016We concluded that the defendant’s “words, the bulge under his shirt, and his gestures toward Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 82A01-1602-PC-394| October 17, 2016 Page 7 of 11 that bulge, all creating the inference he possessed a gun, were sufficient to indicate he was threatening the use of force upon [the manager].” Simmons, 455 N.E.2d at 1148 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence2015The Smith court specifically limited its decision to the situation where the defendant “tendered such an instruction,” and excluded the situations in which “there is no indication that the defendant tendered an instruction explaining this point of law.” Smith, 777 N.E.2d at 36 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Lindley v. State
neutral
2 sentences1928An instruction similar to the one before us was presented in the appeal of Lindley v. State (1927), 199 Ind. 18 , 154 N. E. 867 , which was disapproved, although such instructions have been held not to be erroneous even though subject to adverse criticism. 1928An instruction similar to the one before us was presented in the appeal of Lindley v. State (1927), 199 Ind. 18 , 154 N. E. 867 , which was disapproved, although such instructions have been held not to be erroneous even though subject to adverse criticism. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.