8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1945–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Duperon v. Duperongreen2 sentences2023See also Duperon v Duperon, 175 Mich App 77, 79 ; 437 NW2d 318 (1989) (“The FOC’s 12 As defined in the Estates and Protected Individuals Code, MCL 700.1101 et seq., the term “visitor” means “an individual appointed in a guardianship or protective proceeding who is trained in law, nursing, or social work, is an officer, employee, or special appointee of the court, and has no personal interest in the proceeding.” MCL 700.5101(d) (emphasis added). 13 See MCR 5.125 (providing a long list of potentially “interested persons” relative to probate court proceedings). -11- report and recommendation is n 2023See also Duperon v Duperon, 175 Mich App 77, 79 ; 437 NW2d 318 (1989) (“The FOC’s 12 As defined in the Estates and Protected Individuals Code, MCL 700.1101 et seq., the term “visitor” means “an individual appointed in a guardianship or protective proceeding who is trained in law, nursing, or social work, is an officer, employee, or special appointee of the court, and has no personal interest in the proceeding.” MCL 700.5101(d) (emphasis added). 13 See MCR 5.125 (providing a long list of potentially “interested persons” relative to probate court proceedings). -11- report and recommendation is n | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Craig v. Oakwood Hospital
green
2 sentences2018Craig, 471 Mich at 87 . 2018Craig, 471 Mich at 87 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Bowler v. Bowler
green
2 sentences2023Indeed, as a comparison, the long- established rule with regard to reports prepared by the Friend of the Court (FOC) in custody disputes is that the trial court may “consider its recommendations,” but the report is “not admissible as evidence over proper objection.” Bowler v Bowler, 351 Mich 398, 404-405 ; 88 NW2d 505 (1958). 2023Indeed, as a comparison, the long- established rule with regard to reports prepared by the Friend of the Court (FOC) in custody disputes is that the trial court may “consider its recommendations,” but the report is “not admissible as evidence over proper objection.” Bowler v Bowler, 351 Mich 398, 404-405 ; 88 NW2d 505 (1958). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Allen
green
2 sentences1980Based upon the long established rule that the corpus delicti must first be established before admissions or confessions of the accused may be put in evidence, People v Swetland, 77 Mich 53, 63 ; 43 *428 NW 779 (1889), People v Allen, 390 Mich 383 ; 212 NW2d 21 (1973), defendant argues that, except for his confession as set forth in the several statements described earlier, the prosecution failed to independently prove: (a) a robbery had occurred, or (b) aiding and abetting. 1980Based upon the long established rule that the corpus delicti must first be established before admissions or confessions of the accused may be put in evidence, People v Swetland, 77 Mich 53, 63 ; 43 *428 NW 779 (1889), People v Allen, 390 Mich 383 ; 212 NW2d 21 (1973), defendant argues that, except for his confession as set forth in the several statements described earlier, the prosecution failed to independently prove: (a) a robbery had occurred, or (b) aiding and abetting. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Swetland
green
1 sentence1980Based upon the long established rule that the corpus delicti must first be established before admissions or confessions of the accused may be put in evidence, People v Swetland, 77 Mich 53, 63 ; 43 *428 NW 779 (1889), People v Allen, 390 Mich 383 ; 212 NW2d 21 (1973), defendant argues that, except for his confession as set forth in the several statements described earlier, the prosecution failed to independently prove: (a) a robbery had occurred, or (b) aiding and abetting. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Ferguson
green
2 sentences1974People v Ferguson, 376 Mich 90 ; 135 NW2d 357 (1965); People v Smith, 19 Mich App 359 ; 172 NW2d 902 (1969). 1974People v Ferguson, 376 Mich 90 ; 135 NW2d 357 (1965); People v Smith, 19 Mich App 359 ; 172 NW2d 902 (1969). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
People v. Smith
green
2 sentences1974People v Ferguson, 376 Mich 90 ; 135 NW2d 357 (1965); People v Smith, 19 Mich App 359 ; 172 NW2d 902 (1969). 1974People v Ferguson, 376 Mich 90 ; 135 NW2d 357 (1965); People v Smith, 19 Mich App 359 ; 172 NW2d 902 (1969). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Milliman v. Aurand
green
1 sentence1965We find no reason, for doing so.” Milliman v. Aurand (1963), 369 Mich 309 , offered the Court no opportunity to abolish the rule. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Style v. Greenslade
green
1 sentence1961Style v. Greenslade, 364 Mich 679 , and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Voss v. Adams
neutral
1 sentence1945In this jurisdiction a wrQngdoer has not been permitted to say that because the damage he has done to an injured party is not capable of determination with precise accuracy, therefore such injured party can recover nothing from the wrongdoer. ■ More than 60 years ago Justice Cooley in Briggs v. Brushaber, supra, wherein plaintiff sought recovery for an alleged fraud1, said: *253 “It is true this (plaintiff’s damage) could not be definitely fixed by the evidence; witnesses might disagree respecting it; the market value of lands might rise afterwards to an extent that would make the mortgage ava | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.