8 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2024While seeking evidence for impeachment is a permissible inquiry, it is not triggered by the rule of completeness, particularly when there is no dispute that the entirety of Defendant’s charged conduct is captured on the admitted video. 3 2 State v. Wood, 597 S.W.3d 405 , 407 (Mo. App. S.D. 2020) (citing State v. Brown, 360 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012)). 3 Defendant’s only point on appeal is directed at the trial court’s error in overruling his objection under the rule of completeness. | 1 | 1 |
Alderson v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Special Law Claim The plaintiffs argue the circuit court erred in dismissing their special law claim pursuant to article III, § 40(28) of the Missouri Constitution, which prohibits the General Assembly from passing any special law "granting to any corporation, association or individual any special or exclusive right, privilege or immunity." "A special law includes less than all who are similarly situated . . . but a law is not special if it applies to all of a given class alike and the classification is made on a reasonable basis." Alderson v. State, 273 S.W.3d 533, 538 (Mo. banc 2009) (intern 2016Special Law Claim The plaintiffs argue the circuit court erred in dismissing their special law claim pursuant to article III, § 40(28) of the Missouri Constitution, which prohibits the General Assembly from passing any special law “granting to any corporation, association or individual any special or exclusive'right, privilege or immunity.” “A special law includes less than all who are similarly situated ... but a law is not special if it applies to all of a given class alike and the classification is made on a reasonable basis.” Alderson v. State, 273 S.W.3d 533, 538 (Mo. banc 2009) (internal | 1 | 1 |
State v. Heinzgreen1 sentence1982The prosecutor’s argument was a permissible challenge to the credibility of defendant who clearly had the most to gain if the jury believed his testimony that he was totally innocent of the robbery. “[W]hen a defendant offers himself as a witness in his own behalf, his testimony is subject to the same arguments on the issue of credibility as any other witness.” State v. Heinz, 607 S.W.2d 873, 880 (Mo.App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. Jungerman
green
1 sentence2025Harris, 560 S.W.3d at 560 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Montgomery
green
1 sentence2002He relies on State v. Montgomery, 901 S.W.2d 255 (Mo.App.1995). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1995The request was consistent with Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 1995The request was consistent with Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Westside Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Dexter
green
1 sentence1979Bormann v. City of Richmond Heights, 213 S.W.2d 249 , 253 (Mo.App.1948); Westside Enterprises v. City of Dexter, supra, l.c. 640. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hunter v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
green
1 sentence1966Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Mo., 315 S.W.2d 689, 697 , and that the trial court after thoughtful consideration ordered a remit-titur of $10,000, Greenan v. Emerson Electric Mfg. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.