5 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1907–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
June Hannah v. Bill Haskins, D/B/A Cloverleaf Fertilizer Company and Dwayne Elvin Bentley, Kirk National Leasing Co., Incgreen1 sentence1990Accord Hannah v. Haskins, 612 F.2d 373, 375 (8th Cir.1980) ("The scope of the permissible inquiry is thus set by the direct examination and the usual rules on cross-examination apply.”); Sheehy v. Southern Pac. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. State
green
1 sentence1997The Supreme Court of Delaware did limit the permissible factors that may be considered in Moore v. State, 456 A.2d at 1224 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Nutt v. A.C. & S., Inc.
green
1 sentence1987The Supreme Court recognized manifestation of disease as a permissible standard in the field of workmen’s compensation in Alloy and this Court applied that concept in Nutt v. A.C. & S. Co., Inc., Del.Super., 466 A.2d 18 (1983), aff'd. sub nom Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America, Del.Supr., 480 A.2d 647 (1984). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America
green
1 sentence1987The Supreme Court recognized manifestation of disease as a permissible standard in the field of workmen’s compensation in Alloy and this Court applied that concept in Nutt v. A.C. & S. Co., Inc., Del.Super., 466 A.2d 18 (1983), aff'd. sub nom Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America, Del.Supr., 480 A.2d 647 (1984). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Gordy v. Preform Building Components, Inc.
green
1 sentence1984Thus, setoff was not permitted whether by the statute or by the decisional law relating to sci. fa. actions based upon the record. 310 A.2d at 896 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Bowles v. Indiana Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1907Co., 62 N. E. 94 , are cases in which the injuries complained of were received before or after working hours when the employee was being conveyed to or from his work by the employer, and it was held in each case that this was a permissible privilege allowed by the defendant to the complainant in his capacity as servant. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.