Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. DeVincentisgreen2 sentences2025See, e.g., State v. DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d 11, 17-18 , 74 P.3d 119 (2003); Gresham, 173 Wn.2d at 421-22 . 2023See, e.g., DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d at 17-18 ; Gresham, 173 Wn.2d at 421-22 . | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Benallygreen2 sentences2002As one court explained, "[a]n aberrant behavior departure must be based upon something other than the fact the act `is merely a first offense.' `Stated differently, the permissible factors in this context must illustrate some unique circumstancesome element of abnormal or exceptional behaviorbeside the fact the defendant has never before committed the crime.'" Constantine, 263 F.3d at 1127 (quoting United States v. Benally, 215 F.3d 1068, 1074 (10th Cir.2000)). 2002As one court explained, “[a]n aberrant behavior departure must be based upon something other than the fact the act ‘is merely a first offense.’ ‘Stated differently, the permissible factors in this context must illustrate some unique circumstance—some element of abnormal or exceptional behavior—beside the fact the defendant has never before committed the crime.’ ” Constantine, 263 F.3d at 1127 (citation omitted) (quoting United States v. Benally, 215 F.3d 1068, 1074 (10th Cir. 2000)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Alvaradogreen2 sentences2025RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 567-68 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). 2025RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 567-68 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Constantinegreen2 sentences2002As one court explained, "[a]n aberrant behavior departure must be based upon something other than the fact the act `is merely a first offense.' `Stated differently, the permissible factors in this context must illustrate some unique circumstancesome element of abnormal or exceptional behaviorbeside the fact the defendant has never before committed the crime.'" Constantine, 263 F.3d at 1127 (quoting United States v. Benally, 215 F.3d 1068, 1074 (10th Cir.2000)). 2002As one court explained, “[a]n aberrant behavior departure must be based upon something other than the fact the act ‘is merely a first offense.’ ‘Stated differently, the permissible factors in this context must illustrate some unique circumstance—some element of abnormal or exceptional behavior—beside the fact the defendant has never before committed the crime.’ ” Constantine, 263 F.3d at 1127 (citation omitted) (quoting United States v. Benally, 215 F.3d 1068, 1074 (10th Cir. 2000)). | 1 | 2 |
State v. DeVincentisgreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., State v. DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d 11, 17-18 , 74 P.3d 119 (2003); Gresham, 173 Wn.2d at 421-22 . | 1 | 1 |
Carlson v. City of Bellevuegreen2 sentences1980See, e.g., Carlson v. Bellevue, 73 Wn.2d 41 , 435 P.2d 957 (1968); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715 , 453 P.2d 832 (1969). 1980See, e.g., Carlson v. Bellevue, 73 Wn.2d 41 , 435 P.2d 957 (1968); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715 , 453 P.2d 832 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gresham
green
2 sentences2025See, e.g., State v. DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d 11, 17-18 , 74 P.3d 119 (2003); Gresham, 173 Wn.2d at 421-22 . 2023See, e.g., DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d at 17-18 ; Gresham, 173 Wn.2d at 421-22 . | 2 | 2023–2025 |
State v. Alvarado
green
2 sentences2025RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 567-68 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). 2025RCW 9.94A.535(2)(c); State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 567-68 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Andress
red
2 sentences2021State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700, 710 , 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 . 2020State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700 , 710 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 21 No. 36795-9-III State v. Jones 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 ; State v. Bryant, 89 Wn. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
State v. Leech
green
2 sentences2021State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700, 710 , 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 . 2021State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700, 710 , 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 . | 2 | 2020–2021 |
State v. Shipp
green
2 sentences2021State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700, 710 , 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 . 2020State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700 , 710 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 21 No. 36795-9-III State v. Jones 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 ; State v. Bryant, 89 Wn. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
In Re Personal Restraint of Andress
red
2 sentences2021State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700, 710 , 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 . 2020State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700 , 710 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 21 No. 36795-9-III State v. Jones 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 ; State v. Bryant, 89 Wn. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Wayne GLENN, Defendant-Appellant
green
2 sentences1990Cir. 1976); United States v. Grandmont, 680 F.2d 867 (1st Cir. 1982); United States v. Glenn, 667 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir. 1982). 1990Cir.1976); United States v. Grandmont, 680 F.2d 867 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Glenn, 667 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir.1982). | 2 | 1988–1990 |
United States v. Richard Grandmont
green
2 sentences1990Cir. 1976); United States v. Grandmont, 680 F.2d 867 (1st Cir. 1982); United States v. Glenn, 667 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir. 1982). 1990Cir.1976); United States v. Grandmont, 680 F.2d 867 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Glenn, 667 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir.1982). | 2 | 1988–1990 |
United States v. Tyrone Smith, United States of America v. Anthony E. Gartrell
green
2 sentences1990The rule is stated in the disjunctive, "dishonesty or false statement." Yet, even where the federal courts have allowed inquiry into the underlying facts of a theft crime to determine whether it involves dishonesty or false statement, they have often stated the permissible inquiry as whether the offense was committed "by fraudulent or deceitful means." See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 551 F.2d 348 (D.C. 1990The rule is stated in the disjunctive, "dishonesty or false statement." Yet, even where the federal courts have allowed inquiry into the underlying facts of a theft crime to determine whether it involves dishonesty or false statement, they have often stated the permissible inquiry as whether the offense was committed "by fraudulent or deceitful means." See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 551 F.2d 348 (D.C. | 2 | 1988–1990 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2025Under Strickland, both deficient performance and prejudice must be proven, and without one, the ineffective assistance challenge fails. 466 U.S. at 687 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Crossguns
green
1 sentence2023Crossguns, 199 Wn.2d at 290 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Bryant
green
1 sentence2020State v. Leech, 114 Wn.2d 700 , 710 790 P.2d 160 (1990), abrogated on other grounds by In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 21 No. 36795-9-III State v. Jones 147 Wn.2d 602 , 56 P.3d 981 (2002); State v. Shipp, 93 Wn.2d at 515-16 ; State v. Bryant, 89 Wn. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Smith v. Skagit County
green
2 sentences1980See, e.g., Carlson v. Bellevue, 73 Wn.2d 41 , 435 P.2d 957 (1968); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715 , 453 P.2d 832 (1969). 1980See, e.g., Carlson v. Bellevue, 73 Wn.2d 41 , 435 P.2d 957 (1968); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715 , 453 P.2d 832 (1969). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.