sustained defense (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

sustained defense in New Jersey

8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1900–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Dolphy v. Stategreen
ga · 2011 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See, e.g., Dolphy v. State, 707 S.E.2d 56, 57-58 (Ga. 2011) (where the trial court sustained the defense objection to PowerPoint slides declaring "Defendant's Story Is a Lie" and asserting that "People Lie When They Are Guilty" and gave an "immediate corrective action, ordering that the slides be taken down" and an adequate curative instruction); cf. State v. Sucharew, 66 P.3d 59, 64 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003) (finding no abuse of discretion in allowing a prosecutor to use a PowerPoint that consisted of pictures provided in discovery and later admitted into evidence at trial and descriptive text ec

11
State v. Sucharewgreen
arizctapp · 2003 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See, e.g., Dolphy v. State, 707 S.E.2d 56, 57-58 (Ga. 2011) (where the trial court sustained the defense objection to PowerPoint slides declaring "Defendant's Story Is a Lie" and asserting that "People Lie When They Are Guilty" and gave an "immediate corrective action, ordering that the slides be taken down" and an adequate curative instruction); cf. State v. Sucharew, 66 P.3d 59, 64 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003) (finding no abuse of discretion in allowing a prosecutor to use a PowerPoint that consisted of pictures provided in discovery and later admitted into evidence at trial and descriptive text ec

11
Local 101 of the United Transportation Union v. United Transportation Uniongreen
ny · 1975 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
2 sentences

1975The court sustained the waiver of appeal, finding the arrangement to have been thoroughly discussed with counsel and family and the interrogation by the trial court on the plea and waiver to have been exemplary. 331 N.E. 2d at 685 .

1975The court sustained the waiver of appeal, finding the arrangement to have been thoroughly discussed with counsel and family and the interrogation by the trial court on the plea and waiver to have been exemplary. 331 N. E. 2d at 685.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
In re the Personal Restraint of Glasmanngreen
wash · 2012 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See, e.g., Dolphy v. State, 707 S.E.2d 56, 57-58 (Ga. 2011) (where the trial court sustained the defense objection to PowerPoint slides declaring "Defendant's Story Is a Lie" and asserting that "People Lie When They Are Guilty" and gave an "immediate corrective action, ordering that the slides be taken down" and an adequate curative instruction); cf. State v. Sucharew, 66 P.3d 59, 64 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003) (finding no abuse of discretion in allowing a prosecutor to use a PowerPoint that consisted of pictures provided in discovery and later admitted into evidence at trial and descriptive text ec

11

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees v. Superior Court green
calctapp · 1997
2 sentences

2000In Union of Needletrades, Indus. & Textile Employees v. Superior Court, 56 Cal.App.4th 996 , 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 838 (1997), a different panel of the court sustained a requirement that an applicant submit information that would enable objective determination of whether such risks would be presented.

2000In Union of Needletrades, Indus. & Textile Employees v. Superior Court, 56 Cal.App.4th 996 , 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 838 (1997), a different panel of the court sustained a requirement that an applicant submit information that would enable objective determination of whether such risks would be presented.

12000–2000
Cloyes v. Township of Delaware green
nj · 1957
2 sentences

1960In dealing with the statute the court said: "* * * The introductory statement appended to the bill recites that `[t]he design * * * is to clarify the existing law as to the non-liability of counties, municipalities and school districts * * *.' Use of the verb `clarify' might at first blush suggest the aim to be a mere holding of the line at the then level of judicial decision in *174 the covered phase of the field, but this view seems unsound in the light of the title ["An Act establishing the non-liability of counties, municipalities and school districts by reason of an injury to the person f

1960In dealing with the statute the court said: "* * * The introductory statement appended to the bill recites that `[t]he design * * * is to clarify the existing law as to the non-liability of counties, municipalities and school districts * * *.' Use of the verb `clarify' might at first blush suggest the aim to be a mere holding of the line at the then level of judicial decision in *174 the covered phase of the field, but this view seems unsound in the light of the title ["An Act establishing the non-liability of counties, municipalities and school districts by reason of an injury to the person f

11960–1960
Pine Crest Memorial Park v. Burton neutral
ark · 1958
1 sentence

1959As the evidence shows, there are dealers who would prepare this particular alloy.” ( 312 S. W. 2d, at page 923 .) Reference is made to this phase of the matter particularly because the Attorney General has called to our attention the anti-trust suit and consent judgment therein of United States v. Jas.

11959–1959
In re the Accounting of Brown green
nyappdiv · 1954
1 sentence

1956While the distinction drawn by the court is far from satisfying it is entirely clear in the instant matter that Massachusetts’ claim is not as a true heir but is in the nature of bona vacantia or escheat. *300 Although there is some diversity in the American decisions, most of them follow the principles enunciated in Barnett’s Trusts, supra. In In re Menschefrend’s Estate, 283 App. Div. 463 , 128 N. Y.

11956–1956
Commercial, C., Co. v. Southern Surety Co. green
njch · 1926
1 sentence

1949Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. v. Southern *Page 509 Surety Co., 100 N.J.

11949–1949
Elsey v. Odd Fellows' Mutual Relief Ass'n green
mass · 1886
1 sentence

1900In the Marsh Case the prior decisions in Elsey v. Association, 142 Mass. 224 , and Tyler v. Association, 145 Mass. 135 , were referred to, and on this point substantially overruled.

11900–1900

Where else courts name it

LA 114 (1897–2025) NY 68 (1916–2024) IL 67 (1898–2025) CA 60 (1984–2026) TX 49 (1891–2025) OH 25 (1999–2024) PA 25 (1892–2024) MI 18 (1901–2025) WA 16 (1922–2024) FL 15 (1993–2021) GA 12 (1981–2026) MS 11 (1959–2024) MD 10 (1934–2013) NC 10 (1890–2023) AL 9 (1987–2013) NJ 8 (1900–2014) MO 8 (1885–1995) OK 7 (1930–2009) TN 7 (1926–2015) MN 6 (1901–2007) KY 6 (1908–2025) CT 6 (1941–2025) IA 5 (1908–2026) KS 5 (1986–2024) VA 5 (1908–1985) WV 4 (1936–1974) CO 4 (2022–2025) AZ 4 (1994–2022) HI 4 (1944–2019) SC 3 (1912–2006) AR 3 (1918–2012) NM 3 (1946–1946) DC 3 (1976–2016) IN 3 (1861–1892) ID 3 (1972–2010) MA 2 (1961–1986) ND 2 (1911–1940) MT 2 (1895–1897) AK 2 (1982–2021) WI 2 (1899–2022) UT 2 (1917–2018) OR 2 (2006–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check