5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Owensgreen1 sentence2026Davenport Gas, 13 Iowa at 231 . 18 “that, by its very nature, a felon-in-possession charge puts the jury on notice of a defendant’s status as a felon, thereby injecting unfairness into its deliberations.” 635 N.W.2d 478, 482 (Iowa 2001). | 1 | 1 |
City of Tukwila v. Naldergreen1 sentence2018See Iowa Code § 709.21 (3) (2017). 2 The Washington Court of Appeals later distinguished Berber in City of Tukwila v. Nalder , 53 Wash. App. 746 , 751 (Wash. Ct. App. 1989), where an officer looked through the crack between the door to a stall and the support post in a public restroom, finding the defendant had an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy within a toilet stall with a closed door. 3 Deputy Doty was asked, "And if you took a step back, could you clearly see around the divider?" but the court sustained defense counsel's objection to the answer on the ground of foundation, as | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davenport Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of Davenport
green
1 sentence2026Davenport Gas, 13 Iowa at 231 . 18 “that, by its very nature, a felon-in-possession charge puts the jury on notice of a defendant’s status as a felon, thereby injecting unfairness into its deliberations.” 635 N.W.2d 478, 482 (Iowa 2001). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Tedens v. Sanitary District
neutral
2 sentences1922In Tedens v. Sanitary District, 149 Ill. 87 ( 36 N. E. 1033 ), the same court sustained an instruction to the jury that, in fixing the value of property, they were not “to consider the price that property would sell 'for under special or extraordinary circumstances, but its fair cash market value, if sold in the market under ordinary circumstances. ’ ’ There is in this case but very slight evidence of the actual value of the property in question, as defined by the authorities. 1922In Tedens v. Sanitary District, 149 Ill. 87 ( 36 N. E. 1033 ), the same court sustained an instruction to the jury that, in fixing the value of property, they were not “to consider the price that property would sell 'for under special or extraordinary circumstances, but its fair cash market value, if sold in the market under ordinary circumstances. ’ ’ There is in this case but very slight evidence of the actual value of the property in question, as defined by the authorities. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Pythias Knights' Supreme Lodge v. Beck
green
2 sentences1917In Supreme Lodge v. Beck, 181 U. S. 49 ( 45 L. 1917In Supreme Lodge v. Beck, 181 U. S. 49 ( 45 L. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Brentner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.
neutral
1 sentence1908Co., 68 Iowa, 530 , in which the court sustained an instruction throwing upon the company tbe burden of proving that it bad built a good and sufficient fence. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.