8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kastigar v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1993Transactional immunity widely was accepted as the only form of immunity coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination. *400 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 452-53 , 92 S.Ct. 1653, 1661 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 212, 221 (1972). 1993Transactional immunity widely was accepted as the only form of immunity coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination. *400 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 452-53 , 92 S.Ct. 1653, 1661 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 212, 221 (1972). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Pattongreen2 sentences1999Transactional immunity affords a witness "absolute immunity from future prosecution for the offense to which the testimony relates.” Patton, supra, 133 N.J. at 399 , 627 A.2d 1112 . 1999Transactional immunity affords a witness "absolute immunity from future prosecution for the offense to which the testimony relates.” Patton, supra, 133 N.J. at 399 , 627 A.2d 1112 . | 1 | 2 |
Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York Citygreen1 sentence2025Patton, 133 N.J. at 400 (internal quotations omitted). 12 be taken as equivalent either to a confession of guilt or a conclusive presumption of perjury.” Slochower v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of N.Y.C., 350 U.S. 551, 557 (1956). | 1 | 1 |
Smelkinson v. Ethel & Mac Corp.green2 sentences1998Smelkinson, supra, 178 N.J.Super. at 471 [ 429 A.2d 422 ], We note, Alicia’s amended complaint sought to add a claim for PIP benefits, but did not seek to add a new party. 1998Smelkinson, supra, 178 N.J.Super. at 471 [ 429 A.2d 422 ], We note, Alicia’s amended complaint sought to add a claim for PIP benefits, but did not seek to add a new party. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kennygreen1 sentence1985It protects the witness "from prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 453 , 92 S.Ct. 1653, 1661 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 212, 222 (1972), reh'g den. 408 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 2478 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 345 (1972); State v. Kenny, 68 N.J. 17, 23 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Zicarelligreen2 sentences1974In In re Zicarelli, 55 N.J. 249, 265 (1970), aff'd 406 U.S. 472 , 92 S.Ct. 1670 , 32 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972), the court said that transactional immunity bars "prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Accord, Kastigar v. United States, supra, 406 U.S. at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 . 1974In In re Zicarelli, 55 N.J. 249, 265 (1970), aff'd 406 U.S. 472 , 92 S.Ct. 1670 , 32 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972), the court said that transactional immunity bars "prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Accord, Kastigar v. United States, supra, 406 U.S. at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Butler v. State
green
2 sentences1996We reject defendant's claim that he was granted transactional immunity by the federal prosecutor. "`Transactional immunity' ... means that the compelled witness will not be prosecuted at all for the criminal transaction about which he is compelled to testify." Butler v. State, 55 Md. 1996App. 409 , 462 A. 2d 1230 , 1235 *117 (Md. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Strong
green
2 sentences1993As we noted in Strong, supra, legislators viewed that form of immunity as overprotective of the privilege. 110 N.J. at 589 , 542 A. 2d 866 . 1993As we noted in Strong, supra, legislators viewed that form of immunity as overprotective of the privilege. 110 N.J. at 589 , 542 A. 2d 866 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States
green
1 sentence1985It protects the witness "from prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 453 , 92 S.Ct. 1653, 1661 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 212, 222 (1972), reh'g den. 408 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 2478 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 345 (1972); State v. Kenny, 68 N.J. 17, 23 (1975). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kastigar v. United States
green
1 sentence1985It protects the witness "from prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 453 , 92 S.Ct. 1653, 1661 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 212, 222 (1972), reh'g den. 408 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 2478 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 345 (1972); State v. Kenny, 68 N.J. 17, 23 (1975). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Arthur Marcus v. United States
green
2 sentences1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 372 U. S. 944 , 83 S. Ct. 933 , 9 L. 1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir.1962), cert. den. 372 U.S. 944 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 969 (1963). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Mel Dar Corp. v. Commissioner
green
2 sentences1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 372 U. S. 944 , 83 S. Ct. 933 , 9 L. 1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir.1962), cert. den. 372 U.S. 944 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 969 (1963). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
United States v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
green
2 sentences1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 372 U. S. 944 , 83 S. Ct. 933 , 9 L. 1975The precise issue was discussed in Marcus v. United States, 310 F. 2d 143 (3 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 372 U. S. 944 , 83 S. Ct. 933 , 9 L. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Piccirillo v. New York
green
2 sentences1974Transactional immunity, which accords full immunity from prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates, affords the witness considerably broader protection than does the Fifth Amendment privilege. [at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 ] Although stated in a dissenting opinion, Justice Brennan has accurately defined the scope of transactional immunity in Piccirillo v. New York, 400 U.S. 548, 568-569 , 91 S.Ct. 520, 531 , 27 L.Ed.2d 596 (1971), as follows: * * * It provides the individual with an assurance that he is not testifying about matters for which he may la 1974Transactional immunity, which accords full immunity from prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates, affords the witness considerably broader protection than does the Fifth Amendment privilege. [at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 ] Although stated in a dissenting opinion, Justice Brennan has accurately defined the scope of transactional immunity in Piccirillo v. New York, 400 U.S. 548, 568-569 , 91 S.Ct. 520, 531 , 27 L.Ed.2d 596 (1971), as follows: * * * It provides the individual with an assurance that he is not testifying about matters for which he may la | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of Investigation
green
2 sentences1974In In re Zicarelli, 55 N.J. 249, 265 (1970), aff'd 406 U.S. 472 , 92 S.Ct. 1670 , 32 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972), the court said that transactional immunity bars "prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Accord, Kastigar v. United States, supra, 406 U.S. at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 . 1974In In re Zicarelli, 55 N.J. 249, 265 (1970), aff'd 406 U.S. 472 , 92 S.Ct. 1670 , 32 L.Ed.2d 234 (1972), the court said that transactional immunity bars "prosecution for the offense to which the compelled testimony relates." Accord, Kastigar v. United States, supra, 406 U.S. at 453, 92 S.Ct. at 1661 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 222 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.