Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Patten v. Sturgeongreen1 sentence1976In Patten v. Sturgeon, 214 F. 65, 67 (8th Cir.1914), the court applied the principle in different circumstances. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Caughey v. Middle
green
2 sentences2008First, in State ex rel Caughey v. Middle, 167 Or App 261, 266 , 1 P3d 495 , rev den, 330 Or 553 (2000), we held that Roof concerned paragraph (b) of the above-quoted rule (then numbered OAR 255-35-022(7)) pertaining to multiple consecutive sentences, and not paragraph (a), which indicates that the rule does not apply when a single consecutive sentence is imposed. 2008First, in State ex rel Caughey v. Middle, 167 Or App 261, 266 , 1 P3d 495 , rev den, 330 Or 553 (2000), we held that Roof concerned paragraph (b) of the above-quoted rule (then numbered OAR 255-35-022(7)) pertaining to multiple consecutive sentences, and not paragraph (a), which indicates that the rule does not apply when a single consecutive sentence is imposed. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Turley
green
2 sentences2008We followed and applied the above-quoted rule in Turley. 202 Or.App. at 47-48 , 120 P.3d 1229 . 2008We followed and applied the above-quoted rule in Turley. 202 Or.App. at 47-48 , 120 P.3d 1229 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Boyd
green
1 sentence2001Boyd, 271 Or at 566 n 5. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jans
green
2 sentences1996As this court stated in In re Jans, 295 Or 289, 295 , 666 P2d 830 (1983), it is “never proper for a lawyer to represent clients with conflicting interests no matter how carefully and thoroughly the lawyer discloses the possible effect and obtains consent.” Although this court amended DR *480 5-105 after Jans was decided, the above-quoted principle still applies to situations of actual conflict. 1996As this court stated in In re Jans, 295 Or 289, 295 , 666 P2d 830 (1983), it is “never proper for a lawyer to represent clients with conflicting interests no matter how carefully and thoroughly the lawyer discloses the possible effect and obtains consent.” Although this court amended DR *480 5-105 after Jans was decided, the above-quoted principle still applies to situations of actual conflict. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hornbeck v. Western States Fire Apparatus, Inc.
green
2 sentences1980We are not concerned in this case with implied assumption of risk which was abolished by the 1975 Oregon legislature. 1 The type of assumption of risk in issue in this case is a defense "based on plaintiff’s agreement to join in a sport or similar activity in which the particular risk is a known element of the activity when properly conducted. * * *[T]he defense really negates that a defendant’s conduct which might be fault in other contexts is fault at all, rather than implying that plaintiff forgave the fault in advance.” Hornbeck v. Western States Fire Apparatus, 280 Or 647 , 572 P2d 620 (1 1980We are not concerned in this case with implied assumption of risk which was abolished by the 1975 Oregon legislature. 1 The type of assumption of risk in issue in this case is a defense "based on plaintiff’s agreement to join in a sport or similar activity in which the particular risk is a known element of the activity when properly conducted. * * *[T]he defense really negates that a defendant’s conduct which might be fault in other contexts is fault at all, rather than implying that plaintiff forgave the fault in advance.” Hornbeck v. Western States Fire Apparatus, 280 Or 647 , 572 P2d 620 (1 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Holleman
neutral
2 sentences1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . 1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
State v. Thomson
green
2 sentences1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . 1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
State of Oregon v. Patton
green
2 sentences1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . 1963State v. Holleman, 225 Or 7 , 357 P2d 264 ; State v. Patton, 208 Or 610, 612 , 303 P2d 513 ; State v. Thomson, 203 Or 1, 16 , 278 P2d 142 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Turner v. Sisson
green
1 sentence1937Sisson, supra, is adopted by many courts. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.