8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1891–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Russell v. Kerleygreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362 (1989), State v. Pilothouse 60, 220 Or App 203 , rev den, 345 Or 417 (2008), Wyatt v. Body Imaging, 163 Or App 526 (1999), and Russell v. Kerley, 159 Or App 647 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Samuel v. Frohnmayergreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362 (1989), State v. Pilothouse 60, 220 Or App 203 , rev den, 345 Or 417 (2008), Wyatt v. Body Imaging, 163 Or App 526 (1999), and Russell v. Kerley, 159 Or App 647 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Wyatt v. Body Imaging, P.C.green1 sentence2012See, e.g., Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362 (1989), State v. Pilothouse 60, 220 Or App 203 , rev den, 345 Or 417 (2008), Wyatt v. Body Imaging, 163 Or App 526 (1999), and Russell v. Kerley, 159 Or App 647 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Peck v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISIONgreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362 (1989), State v. Pilothouse 60, 220 Or App 203 , rev den, 345 Or 417 (2008), Wyatt v. Body Imaging, 163 Or App 526 (1999), and Russell v. Kerley, 159 Or App 647 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Pilothouse 60, LLCgreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362 (1989), State v. Pilothouse 60, 220 Or App 203 , rev den, 345 Or 417 (2008), Wyatt v. Body Imaging, 163 Or App 526 (1999), and Russell v. Kerley, 159 Or App 647 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
In re the Estate of Goldburggreen2 sentences1981There being no evidence other than that the landlord offered the premises “* * * on the same terms and conditions as other premises in the building * * we need not decide what specific circumstances would support a finding that the lessor failed to act with due diligence by preferring other property in order to maintain a damage claim against an abandoning tenant. 9 The receiver relies on Casper National Bank v. Curry, 51 Wyo 284, 65 P2d 1116, 1118 (1937); In re Goldburg’s Estate, 148 Misc. 607 , 266 NYS 106, 109 (1933); Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc., 265 Md 538, 290 A2d 780 (1972); and Wi 1981There being no evidence other than that the landlord offered the premises “* * * on the same terms and conditions as other premises in the building * * we need not decide what specific circumstances would support a finding that the lessor failed to act with due diligence by preferring other property in order to maintain a damage claim against an abandoning tenant. 9 The receiver relies on Casper National Bank v. Curry, 51 Wyo 284, 65 P2d 1116, 1118 (1937); In re Goldburg’s Estate, 148 Misc. 607 , 266 NYS 106, 109 (1933); Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc., 265 Md 538, 290 A2d 780 (1972); and Wi | 1 | 1 |
Casper Nationak Bank v. Currygreen1 sentence1981There being no evidence other than that the landlord offered the premises “* * * on the same terms and conditions as other premises in the building * * we need not decide what specific circumstances would support a finding that the lessor failed to act with due diligence by preferring other property in order to maintain a damage claim against an abandoning tenant. 9 The receiver relies on Casper National Bank v. Curry, 51 Wyo 284, 65 P2d 1116, 1118 (1937); In re Goldburg’s Estate, 148 Misc. 607 , 266 NYS 106, 109 (1933); Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc., 265 Md 538, 290 A2d 780 (1972); and Wi | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 693020
green
1 sentence2001In Brady v. Brown, 51 F3d 810 (9th Cir 1995), the defendant challenged the judgment of a federal district court holding him liable for fraud. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Mason v. Sutherlin MacHine Works, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1988In Mason v. Sutherlin Machine Works, 240 Or 51, 54 , 399 P2d 1016 (1965), the court stated: “It is clear that the express purpose of this provision of the act, exempting employers in joint control of premises while engaged in a common enterprise, was to spread the contractual provision of the act so that, while such an operation is in effect, the employees of each employer are to be considered in the same posture as if there was but a single employer.” (Emphasis added.) The repeal of ORS 656.154(1) in 1975 effectively withdrew the immunity of a second employer from the damage claim of a worker 1988In Mason v. Sutherlin Machine Works, 240 Or 51, 54 , 399 P2d 1016 (1965), the court stated: “It is clear that the express purpose of this provision of the act, exempting employers in joint control of premises while engaged in a common enterprise, was to spread the contractual provision of the act so that, while such an operation is in effect, the employees of each employer are to be considered in the same posture as if there was but a single employer.” (Emphasis added.) The repeal of ORS 656.154(1) in 1975 effectively withdrew the immunity of a second employer from the damage claim of a worker | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
green
1 sentence1981There being no evidence other than that the landlord offered the premises “* * * on the same terms and conditions as other premises in the building * * we need not decide what specific circumstances would support a finding that the lessor failed to act with due diligence by preferring other property in order to maintain a damage claim against an abandoning tenant. 9 The receiver relies on Casper National Bank v. Curry, 51 Wyo 284, 65 P2d 1116, 1118 (1937); In re Goldburg’s Estate, 148 Misc. 607 , 266 NYS 106, 109 (1933); Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc., 265 Md 538, 290 A2d 780 (1972); and Wi | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Wilson v. Ruhl
green
1 sentence1981There being no evidence other than that the landlord offered the premises “* * * on the same terms and conditions as other premises in the building * * we need not decide what specific circumstances would support a finding that the lessor failed to act with due diligence by preferring other property in order to maintain a damage claim against an abandoning tenant. 9 The receiver relies on Casper National Bank v. Curry, 51 Wyo 284, 65 P2d 1116, 1118 (1937); In re Goldburg’s Estate, 148 Misc. 607 , 266 NYS 106, 109 (1933); Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc., 265 Md 538, 290 A2d 780 (1972); and Wi | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
green
2 sentences1978In Farris v. United States Fidelity, Or., 587 P.2d 1015 (1978), on the other hand, we found that the statutory penalties provided for violations of the insurance code precluded inferring a damage claim for emotional suffering or punitive damages for the violation in question. 1978In Farris v. United States Fidelity, 284 Or 453 , 587 P2d 1015 (1978), on the other hand, we found that the statutory penalties provided for violations of the insurance code precluded inferring a damage claim for emotional suffering or punitive damages for the violation in question. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
O'TOOLE v. Franklin
green
2 sentences1978O'Toole v. Franklin, 279 Or. 513 , 569 P.2d 561 (1977), recognized that a knowing violation of a provision of the Oregon State Bar act could give rise to a damage action by a member of the class for whose protection it was enacted. 1978O'Toole v. Franklin, 279 Or. 513 , 569 P.2d 561 (1977), recognized that a knowing violation of a provision of the Oregon State Bar act could give rise to a damage action by a member of the class for whose protection it was enacted. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.
green
2 sentences1976Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc., 206 Or 187, 205 , 291 P2d 709 , 56 ALR2d 382 (1955); Allen et ux v. McCormick, 193 Or 604, 612 , 238 P2d 220 (1952). 1976Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc., 206 Or 187, 205 , 291 P2d 709 , 56 ALR2d 382 (1955); Allen et ux v. McCormick, 193 Or 604, 612 , 238 P2d 220 (1952). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
ALLEN ET UX. v. McCormick
neutral
2 sentences1976Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc., 206 Or 187, 205 , 291 P2d 709 , 56 ALR2d 382 (1955); Allen et ux v. McCormick, 193 Or 604, 612 , 238 P2d 220 (1952). 1976Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc., 206 Or 187, 205 , 291 P2d 709 , 56 ALR2d 382 (1955); Allen et ux v. McCormick, 193 Or 604, 612 , 238 P2d 220 (1952). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union
green
2 sentences1946Jur., Equity, section 126; Phez Company v. Salem Fruit Union, 103 Or. 514 , 201 P. 222 . 25 A.L.R. 1090 . 1946Jur., Equity, section 126; Phez Company v. Salem Fruit Union, 103 Or. 514 , 201 P. 222 . 25 A.L.R. 1090 . | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Carter v. Strom
neutral
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Lampman v. . Cochran
green
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Lyman v. Babcock
neutral
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Daily v. Litchfield
green
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Trower v. Elder
green
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Niver v. Rossman
neutral
1 sentence1891(Kemble v. Farren, 6 Bing. *141; Carter v. Strom, 41 Minn. 522 ; Lampman v. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275 ; Dailey v. Litchfield, 10 Mich. 29 ; Cheddick v. Marsh, 1 Zab. 463; Trower v. Elder, 77 Ill. 452 ; Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503 ; Niver v. Rossman, 18 Barb. 50 ; 3 Parsons on Contracts, 161; 2 Pom. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.