8 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Melvingreen2 sentences2001State v. Melvin, 913 S.W.2d 195, 205 (Tenn. Crim. 2001State v. Melvin, 913 S.W.2d 195, 205 (Tenn. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Hoover v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Hoover v. State, 215 S.W.3d 776, 780 (Tenn. 2007) (holding that a Range I, thirty-five-year sentence at 100% for second degree murder is not illegal); see also State v. Donquise Tremonte Alexander, No. M2015- 02098-CCA-R3-CD, 2016 WL 768894 , at *2 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Howell v. Stategreen1 sentence2011First, regarding the factor requiring subaverage general intellectual functioning as evidenced by a functional intelligence quotient (I.Q.) of seventy (70) or below pursuant to section 39-13-203(a)(1), the Appellant argues that the trial court erroneously “incorporated a range of error measurement in the test scores” in violation of Howell v. State, 151 S.W.3d 450, 458-59 (Tenn. 2004), in finding that his I.Q. score of 66 by Dr. Rutledge and his I.Q. score of 68 by Dr. Craddock were unreliable. | 1 | 1 |
Bland v. Dukesgreen1 sentence2004The state argues that in Bland v. Dukes, 97 S.W.3d 133, 135-36 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pearsongreen1 sentence2000The Act requires the sentencing court to consider a broad range of factors including “the evidence received both at the trial and at the sentencing hearing, the presentence report, statutory principles of sentencing, the argument of counsel, the nature and characteristics of the offense, mitigating and statutory enhancement factors, statements made by the offender, and the potential for rehabilitation or treatment of the offender.” State v. Pearson, 858 S.W.2d 879, 885 (Tenn.1993). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Poolegreen1 sentence2000With regard to enhancement factors, we have observed that the statute requires only that they be “appropriate for the offense” and “not themselves essential elements of the offense.” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114; see State v. Poole, 945 S.W.2d 93, 95 (Tenn.1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blakely v. Washington
green
1 sentence2011Second, the petitioner contends that the post-conviction court should have addressed his claim regarding the trial court’s enhancing his sentences within the range in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mitchell v. Smith
green
1 sentence2001Although none of these matters standing alone may be sufficient to establish the issues, yet taken together they may have that effect." Mitchell, 779 S. W. 2d at 388 (quoting Hager v. Hager, 17 Tenn. App. 143, 161 , 66 S. W. 2d 250 - 260 (1933)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Hager v. Hager
green
2 sentences2001Although none of these matters standing alone may be sufficient to establish the issues, yet taken together they may have that effect." Mitchell, 779 S. W. 2d at 388 (quoting Hager v. Hager, 17 Tenn. App. 143, 161 , 66 S. W. 2d 250 - 260 (1933)). 2001Although none of these matters standing alone may be sufficient to establish the issues, yet taken together they may have that effect." Mitchell, 779 S. W. 2d at 388 (quoting Hager v. Hager, 17 Tenn. App. 143, 161 , 66 S. W. 2d 250 - 260 (1933)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.