Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Eldridge v. Johndrowgreen2 sentences2020See Eldridge v. Johndrow, 2015 UT 21 , 345 P.3d 553 . 2020See Eldridge v. Johndrow, 2015 UT 21 , 345 P.3d 553 . | 1 | 1 |
Utah Safe to Learn-Safe to Worship Coalition, Inc. v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Utah Safe to Learn-Safe To Worship Coal., Inc. v. State, 2004 UT 32 ¶ 35 , 94 P.3d 217 . 2019See Utah Safe to Learn-Safe To Worship Coal., Inc. v. State, 2004 UT 32 ¶ 35 , 94 P.3d 217 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Younggreen1 sentence2001See Young, 853 P.2d at 353 . | 1 | 1 |
Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.green1 sentence1990Id. at 1089. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of County Commissioners v. Ferrebee
green
1 sentence2020The district court’s decision was correct under our decision in Ferrebee, which held that “just compensation” under article I, section 22 of the Utah Constitution guarantees recovery for takings of and damages to property, but does not sweep more broadly to cover “costs incurred in defending a condemnation action.” Ferrebee, 844 P.2d at 313–14.13 And we find no basis for overruling that decision. ¶44 Our case law identifies a range of factors that we consider in deciding whether to overrule one of our precedents. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
United States v. Dost
green
1 sentence2014Those factors include: (1) “whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area”; (2) “whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity”; (3) “whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of a child”; (4) “whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude”; (5) “whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity”; and (6) “whether the visual depiction is intended | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
green
2 sentences2002Id. 2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.