range factors (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

range factors in Missouri

8 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1899–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Faruqigreen
mo · 2011 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025V. 6 “age, experience, intelligence, gender, lack of education, infirmity, and unusual susceptibility to coercion.” State v. Faruqi, 344 S.W.3d 193, 203 (Mo. banc 2011).

11
State v. Batemangreen
mo · 2010 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016State v. Bateman, 318 S.W.3d 681, 690 (Mo. banc 2010), Indeed, there is rarely a simple litmus test for examining pretext.

11
Reckner v. Fischergreen
moctapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006“Proof of a maintenance check showing the machine was operating within Department of Health regulations within thirty-five days of the date of the test lays a proper foundation that the device is approved.” Reckner v. Fischer, 121 S.W.3d 296, 302 (Mo.App.

11
State v. Malonegreen
mo · 1985 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987It is well settled that the trial court has broad discretion on questions of relevancy and its decision should be disturbed only if it has abused that discretion, State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 757 (Mo. banc 1982); see also State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Mo. banc 1985), and we do not believe there was such an abuse in this case.

1987It is well settled that the trial court has broad discretion on questions of relevancy and its decision should be disturbed only if it has abused that discretion, State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 757 (Mo. banc 1982); see also State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Mo. banc 1985), and we do not believe there was such an abuse in this case.

11
State v. Blairgreen
mo · 1982 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987It is well settled that the trial court has broad discretion on questions of relevancy and its decision should be disturbed only if it has abused that discretion, State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 757 (Mo. banc 1982); see also State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Mo. banc 1985), and we do not believe there was such an abuse in this case.

1987It is well settled that the trial court has broad discretion on questions of relevancy and its decision should be disturbed only if it has abused that discretion, State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 757 (Mo. banc 1982); see also State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Mo. banc 1985), and we do not believe there was such an abuse in this case.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Simmons green
mo · 1997
2 sentences

2017Id.

2011In determining whether a defendant’s confession resulted from improper coercion, this Court considers a range of factors relating to the defendant, including his or her “age, experience, intelligence, gender, lack of education, infirmity, and unusual susceptibility to coercion.” Id. at 175 .

22011–2017
Ashcraft v. Tennessee green
scotus · 1944
1 sentence

2022“In determining whether a defendant’s confession resulted from improper coercion, this Court considers a range of factors relating to the defendant, including his or her age, experience, intelligence, gender, lack of education, infirmity, and unusual susceptibility to coercion.” Id. (internal quotation and citation omitted).

12022–2022
State v. Sasseen neutral
moctapp · 1898
1 sentence

1899It is therefore to be distinguished from State v. Sasseen, 75 Mo. App. 197 .

11899–1899

Where else courts name it

CA 62 (1966–2026) NY 34 (1861–2026) OK 24 (1908–2020) IL 16 (1905–2024) MA 15 (1851–2026) TX 12 (1993–2016) PA 11 (1960–2023) MI 10 (1916–2023) KY 10 (1931–2021) NJ 10 (1974–2021) OR 9 (1987–2025) TN 9 (1933–2016) MO 8 (1899–2025) CO 8 (1990–2021) IN 8 (1990–2023) NC 8 (1978–2023) LA 8 (1909–2020) FL 7 (1985–2025) WI 7 (1976–2023) WA 7 (1989–2017) AL 7 (1912–2011) OH 6 (1939–2026) MN 6 (1939–2026) UT 6 (1990–2020) ME 6 (1973–2017) CT 5 (1959–2006) KS 5 (1896–1983) AZ 5 (1995–2023) WV 4 (2000–2016) MD 4 (1902–1996) DC 4 (1975–2007) ID 3 (1928–2022) NE 3 (1957–2023) VT 3 (1921–2026) VI 3 (2009–2017) SD 2 (1969–2000) DE 2 (1963–2025) GA 2 (1941–2021) IA 2 (2022–2022) VA 2 (1984–1987) NM 2 (2010–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check