8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saunders v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Saunders v. State, 848 N.E.2d 1117, 1123 (Ind.Ct.App.2006). 2012Saunders v. State, 848 N.E.2d 1117, 1123 (Ind.Ct.App.2006), trans. denied. | 3 | 4 |
Dowdy v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Id. [32] In weighing the probative value of a conviction against the unfair prejudice, to a witness, the trial court may consider a range of factors: including (1) the impeachment value of the prior crimes; (2) the point in time of the convictions and the witness’ subsequent history; (3) the similarity between.the past crime and the pharged crime; (4) the importance of the witness’ testimony; and (5) the centrality of the credibility issue. 2006Such factors may include the nature of the prior crime, the length of the person’s criminal record, the witness’s age and circumstances, the likelihood that the person would not testify, the degree of remoteness of the prior crime, the witness’s subsequent career, the centrality of the credibility issue, the need for the person’s testimony, and (if the witness is the defendant) the crime’s similarity to the crime charged. 13 Miller § 609.202 at 171; see also Scalissi 759 N.E.2d at 625 (providing a non-exhaustive list of factors appropriate to consider when the defendant is the witness to be im | 1 | 3 |
Scalissi v. Stategreen1 sentence2006Such factors may include the nature of the prior crime, the length of the person’s criminal record, the witness’s age and circumstances, the likelihood that the person would not testify, the degree of remoteness of the prior crime, the witness’s subsequent career, the centrality of the credibility issue, the need for the person’s testimony, and (if the witness is the defendant) the crime’s similarity to the crime charged. 13 Miller § 609.202 at 171; see also Scalissi 759 N.E.2d at 625 (providing a non-exhaustive list of factors appropriate to consider when the defendant is the witness to be im | 1 | 1 |
Light v. Stategreen1 sentence1990When reviewing cases involving involuntary disclosures, the Supreme Court of the United States has stated that "[the range of inquiry in this type of case must be broad," and that "judgment in each instance [must] be based upon consideration of 'the totality of the cireum-stances.'" Blackburn v. Alabama (1960), 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; see Light v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 1073, 1077 ; Smith v. State (1989), Ind., 543 N.E.2d 634, 637 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Freed v. State
green
1 sentence2023Id. [28] Mills argues this evidence has low probative value because the injuries occurred over a year before the charged incident and were relatively minor. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1990When reviewing cases involving involuntary disclosures, the Supreme Court of the United States has stated that "[the range of inquiry in this type of case must be broad," and that "judgment in each instance [must] be based upon consideration of 'the totality of the cireum-stances.'" Blackburn v. Alabama (1960), 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; see Light v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 1073, 1077 ; Smith v. State (1989), Ind., 543 N.E.2d 634, 637 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Blackburn v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1990When reviewing cases involving involuntary disclosures, the Supreme Court of the United States has stated that "[the range of inquiry in this type of case must be broad," and that "judgment in each instance [must] be based upon consideration of 'the totality of the cireum-stances.'" Blackburn v. Alabama (1960), 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; see Light v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 1073, 1077 ; Smith v. State (1989), Ind., 543 N.E.2d 634, 637 . 1990When reviewing cases involving involuntary disclosures, the Supreme Court of the United States has stated that "[the range of inquiry in this type of case must be broad," and that "judgment in each instance [must] be based upon consideration of 'the totality of the cireum-stances.'" Blackburn v. Alabama (1960), 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 ; see Light v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 1073, 1077 ; Smith v. State (1989), Ind., 543 N.E.2d 634, 637 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.