Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re SJgreen1 sentence2024See id. | 1 | 1 |
In re the Detention of Andersongreen1 sentence2023See 166 Wn.2d at 550 ; 134 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2023When interpreting a statute, “ ‘[t]he court’s fundamental objective is to ascertain and carry out the Legislature’s intent, and if the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to the plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.’ ” Hanson v. Carmona, 1 Wn.2d 362, 373 , 525 P.3d 940 (2023) (alteration in original) (quoting Dep’t of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, LLC, 146 Wn.2d 1, 9-10 , 43 P.3d 4 (2002)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn
green
1 sentence2023When interpreting a statute, “ ‘[t]he court’s fundamental objective is to ascertain and carry out the Legislature’s intent, and if the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to the plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.’ ” Hanson v. Carmona, 1 Wn.2d 362, 373 , 525 P.3d 940 (2023) (alteration in original) (quoting Dep’t of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, LLC, 146 Wn.2d 1, 9-10 , 43 P.3d 4 (2002)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In re the Detention of Froats
green
1 sentence2023See 166 Wn.2d at 550 ; 134 Wn. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Powell
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Recreational Equipment, Inc. v. World Wrapps Northwest, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020Similarly, in Recreational Equipment, the Court of Appeals affirmed that a grace period was proper because the lessee “made substantial improvements to the premises . . . in expectation of exercising the third and fourth options.” 165 Wn. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston County
green
1 sentence2020The crux of the analysis focused on that, “RCW 4.24.525(4)(b) requires the trial judge to make a factual determination of whether the plaintiff has established by clear and convincing evidence a probability of prevailing on the claim.” Id. at 293 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Colbert v. Moomba Sports, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017The trial court dismissed that claim, reasoning that the crux of such a claim was the requirement that a bystander relative had to be "' present within a short period of time [after the accident] to view the victim's suffering."' Id. at 48 . 2017The trial court reasoned that Mr. Colbert "' did not witness any pain, suffering or the like.'" Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. DeVincentis
green
1 sentence2014DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d at 20 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.