Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kellejian v. Kesickigreen1 sentence2024See Kellejian v. Kesicki, 126 Ariz. 12, 13 (App. 1980) (finding defendant's failure to "plead and prove" the statute of frauds before the trial court precluded raising that issue on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Barassi v. Matisongreen1 sentence2023Thus, he cannot here re-assert a personal jurisdiction defense, “whether or not on the basis of arguments made in the [Connecticut] action.” Restatement (Second) Judgments § 27 cmt. c; accord Barassi v. Matison, 134 Ariz. 338, 341 (App. 1982) (explaining that issue preclusion 13 COCCHIA v. TESTA, et al. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Waugh v. Lennard
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 223-24 , 211 P.2d at 812 . 2008Id. at 223-24 , 211 P.2d at 812 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Kiely v. St. Germain
green
1 sentence1992Germain, 670 P.2d 764 (Colo.1983), cited correctly by appellant for the proposition that a balancing test should be applied to the question of a promissory estoppel claim and the Statute of Frauds defense, is inapposite. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Olson v. Neale
green
2 sentences1984Olson v. Neale, 116 Ariz. 522 , 570 P.2d 209 (App.1977). 1984Olson v. Neale, 116 Ariz. 522 , 570 P.2d 209 (App.1977). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Easton v. Wycoff
green
2 sentences1980Custis v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix, 92 Ariz. 202 , 375 P.2d 558 (1962); Easton v. Wycoff, 4 Utah 2d 386 , 295 P.2d 332 (1956). 1980Custis v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix, 92 Ariz. 202 , 375 P.2d 558 (1962); Easton v. Wycoff, 4 Utah 2d 386 , 295 P.2d 332 (1956). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Custis v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix
green
2 sentences1980Custis v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix, 92 Ariz. 202 , 375 P.2d 558 (1962); Easton v. Wycoff, 4 Utah 2d 386 , 295 P.2d 332 (1956). 1980Custis v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix, 92 Ariz. 202 , 375 P.2d 558 (1962); Easton v. Wycoff, 4 Utah 2d 386 , 295 P.2d 332 (1956). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Condon v. Arizona Housing Corporation
green
2 sentences1977The applicable principles are set forth in Restatement of Contracts, § 197, adopted and approved in Condon v. Arizona Housing Corporation, 63 Ariz. 125 , 160 P.2d 342 (1945), as follows: "Where, acting under an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, the purchaser with the assent of the vendor (a) makes valuable improvements on the land, or (b) takes possession thereof or retains a possession thereof existing at the time of the bargain, and also pays a portion or all of the purchase price, the purchaser or the vendor may specifically enforce the contract." It is evident that the 1977The applicable principles are set forth in Restatement of Contracts, § 197, adopted and approved in Condon v. Arizona Housing Corporation, 63 Ariz. 125 , 160 P.2d 342 (1945), as follows: "Where, acting under an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, the purchaser with the assent of the vendor (a) makes valuable improvements on the land, or (b) takes possession thereof or retains a possession thereof existing at the time of the bargain, and also pays a portion or all of the purchase price, the purchaser or the vendor may specifically enforce the contract." It is evident that the | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.