emphasized rule in Connecticut

2019In Kitchens , the court emphasized that waiver involves the idea of assent; State v. Kitchens , supra, at 469 , 10 A.3d 942 ; and explained that implied waiver occurs when a defendant "had sufficient notice of, and accepted, the instruction" proposed or given by the trial court.

2019(Emphasis in original.) Id., at 487 n.25, 10 A.3d 942 .

2018In concluding that "substantiation must be reversed for lack of substantial evidence that the plaintiff's discipline was unreasonable"; id., at 301 , 860 A.2d 1283 ; this court emphasized that the hearing officer improperly "failed to hold a hearing regarding the reasonableness of the plaintiff's discipline of the child before substantiating the allegation of physical abuse." Id., at 297 , 860 A.2d 1283 .

2018In concluding that "substantiation must be reversed for lack of substantial evidence that the plaintiff's discipline was unreasonable"; id., at 301 , 860 A.2d 1283 ; this court emphasized that the hearing officer improperly "failed to hold a hearing regarding the reasonableness of the plaintiff's discipline of the child before substantiating the allegation of physical abuse." Id., at 297 , 860 A.2d 1283 .

2018"In particular, the court emphasized the requirement of the filing of an amendment before the limitations period has run, by distinguishing its prior decision in Torres v. Carrese , 149 Conn. App. 596 , 611 n.14, 90 A.3d 256 , cert. denied, 312 Conn. 912 , 93 A.3d 595 (2014), where the Appellate Court 'noted that the trial court could not consider a new opinion letter attached to the amended complaint because it was obtained after the action commenced, after the defendants had filed their motions to dismiss, and after the statute of limitations had expired ....

2018"In particular, the court emphasized the requirement of the filing of an amendment before the limitations period has run, by distinguishing its prior decision in Torres v. Carrese , 149 Conn. App. 596 , 611 n.14, 90 A.3d 256 , cert. denied, 312 Conn. 912 , 93 A.3d 595 (2014), where the Appellate Court 'noted that the trial court could not consider a new opinion letter attached to the amended complaint because it was obtained after the action commenced, after the defendants had filed their motions to dismiss, and after the statute of limitations had expired ....

2016The court emphasized that the rule does not extend to "all accidents caused by transitory hazards in self-service retail establishments, but rather, only to those accidents that result from particular hazards that occur regularly, or are inherently foreseeable, due to some specific method of operation employed on the premises." Id., at 423 , 3 A.3d 919 . *581 Second, in Konesky v. Post Road Entertainment, 144 Conn.App. 128 , 144, 72 A.3d 1152 (2013), this court clarified both that the mode of operation rule required an identifiable zone of risk and that it did not impose liability on a busines

2016The court emphasized that the rule does not extend to "all accidents caused by transitory hazards in self-service retail establishments, but rather, only to those accidents that result from particular hazards that occur regularly, or are inherently foreseeable, due to some specific method of operation employed on the premises." Id., at 423 , 3 A.3d 919 . *581 Second, in Konesky v. Post Road Entertainment, 144 Conn.App. 128 , 144, 72 A.3d 1152 (2013), this court clarified both that the mode of operation rule required an identifiable zone of risk and that it did not impose liability on a busines

2016The court emphasized that the rule does not extend to "all accidents caused by transitory hazards in self-service retail establishments, but rather, only to those accidents that result from particular hazards that occur regularly, or are inherently foreseeable, due to some specific method of operation employed on the premises." Id., at 423 , 3 A.3d 919 . *581 Second, in Konesky v. Post Road Entertainment, 144 Conn.App. 128 , 144, 72 A.3d 1152 (2013), this court clarified both that the mode of operation rule required an identifiable zone of risk and that it did not impose liability on a busines

2016The court emphasized that the rule does not extend to "all accidents caused by transitory hazards in self-service retail establishments, but rather, only to those accidents that result from particular hazards that occur regularly, or are inherently foreseeable, due to some specific method of operation employed on the premises." Id., at 423 , 3 A.3d 919 . *581 Second, in Konesky v. Post Road Entertainment, 144 Conn.App. 128 , 144, 72 A.3d 1152 (2013), this court clarified both that the mode of operation rule required an identifiable zone of risk and that it did not impose liability on a busines

2003The defendant does not take issue with Catz or the interpretation of that case in Ives v. NMTC, Inc., 46 Conn. Sup. 235 , 746 A.2d 236 (1999).

2003The defendant does not take issue with Catz or the interpretation of that case in Ives v. NMTC, Inc., 46 Conn. Sup. 235 , 746 A.2d 236 (1999).

1988Quoting Corbin v. Baldwin, 92 Conn. 99, 107 , 101 A. 834 (1917), this court stated: “ ‘[T]he exemptions are given for the assistance and help of the private endeavor in its effort to advance the public interest or to perform some share of the public governmental duty. . . .

1988Quoting Corbin v. Baldwin, 92 Conn. 99, 107 , 101 A. 834 (1917), this court stated: “ ‘[T]he exemptions are given for the assistance and help of the private endeavor in its effort to advance the public interest or to perform some share of the public governmental duty. . . .