Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.green1 sentence1989The court emphasized this principle in Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co., 676 P.2d 952, 955 (Utah 1984): “It is axiomatic in this jurisdiction that failure to timely perfect an appeal is a jurisdictional failure requiring dismissal of the appeal.” In an action closely related to the one before us, this court found that it was without jurisdiction to review a decision of the Industrial Commission when the applicable time limit had been exceeded. | 1 | 1 |
Hafen v. Morrisgreen2 sentences1983Were it otherwise, the regular rules of procedure governing appeals and the limitations of time specified therein would be rendered impotent. [Emphasis added.] Among the numerous cases quoting and applying the emphasized standard is Hafen v. Morris, Utah, 632 P.2d 875, 876 (1981), where the Court held that a prisoner’s contention that his counsel failed to challenge a particular juror could not be raised by habe-as corpus because the petitioner had failed to use his “adequate opportunity” to raise that contention at his trial or on direct appeal from his conviction. 1983Were it otherwise, the regular rules of procedure governing appeals and the limitations of time specified therein would be rendered impotent. [Emphasis added.] Among the numerous cases quoting and applying the emphasized standard is Hafen v. Morris, Utah, 632 P.2d 875, 876 (1981), where the Court held that a prisoner's contention that his counsel failed to challenge a particular juror could not be raised by habeas corpus because the petitioner had failed to use his "adequate opportunity" to raise that contention at his trial or on direct appeal from his conviction. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wyatt
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re B.T.B.
green
2 sentences2018The court emphasized that the test for termination of parental rights properly contains both elements, explaining that “[t]he best interest of the child has always been a paramount or ‘polar star’ principle in cases involving termination of parental rights,” and is “a vital ingredient in a determination that has at least two elements,” but that “no court is warranted in applying the ‘polar 20170906-CA 7 2018 UT App 157 In re B.T.B. star principle’” until after evidence of unfitness is present. 2018Id. (quotation simplified). 1 ¶15 Indeed, our supreme court has never endorsed any watering-down of the two-part test for termination of parental rights. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re JP
green
1 sentence2018Id. (quotation simplified). 1 ¶ 15 Indeed, our supreme court has never endorsed any watering-down of the two-part test for termination of parental rights. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith
red
2 sentences2004Drawing from its holding in Smith , the Court emphasized the principle that "a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling governmental interest even if the law has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice." Id. at 531, 113 S.Ct. 2217 (citing Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 ). 2004Drawing from its holding in Smith , the Court emphasized the principle that "a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling governmental interest even if the law has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice." Id. at 531, 113 S.Ct. 2217 (citing Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 ). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
green
2 sentences2004Drawing from its holding in Smith , the Court emphasized the principle that "a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling governmental interest even if the law has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice." Id. at 531, 113 S.Ct. 2217 (citing Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 ). 2004Drawing from its holding in Smith, the Court emphasized the principle that "a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling governmental interest even if the law has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice." Id. at 531 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 (citing Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 ). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Retherford v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH
green
1 sentence1989Retherford, 739 P.2d at 80 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.