7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1948–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Masongreen2 sentences1983See State v. Mason, 186 Conn. 574, 583 , 442 A.2d 1335 (1982); State v. Cosgrove, 186 Conn. 476, 481 , 442 A.2d 1320 (1982). 1983See State v. Mason, 186 Conn. 574, 583 , 442 A.2d 1335 (1982); State v. Cosgrove, 186 Conn. 476, 481 , 442 A.2d 1320 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Beersgreen1 sentence1963All investments other than those named in the statute must be justified, when occasion requires, under the rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment.” Ibid.; see Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum, 76 Conn. 560, 564 (1904), implying that the reference in Clark v. Beers, supra, to the “rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment” is simply a reference to a rule of “reasonable prudence.” In Russell v. Russell, 109 Conn. 187, 194 (1929), however, the court regarded the use of principal for improvement of real es | 1 | 1 |
Russell v. Russellgreen1 sentence1963All investments other than those named in the statute must be justified, when occasion requires, under the rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment.” Ibid.; see Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum, 76 Conn. 560, 564 (1904), implying that the reference in Clark v. Beers, supra, to the “rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment” is simply a reference to a rule of “reasonable prudence.” In Russell v. Russell, 109 Conn. 187, 194 (1929), however, the court regarded the use of principal for improvement of real es | 1 | 1 |
Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylumgreen1 sentence1963All investments other than those named in the statute must be justified, when occasion requires, under the rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment.” Ibid.; see Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum, 76 Conn. 560, 564 (1904), implying that the reference in Clark v. Beers, supra, to the “rigid rules applicable to investments made by trustees upon their own judgment” is simply a reference to a rule of “reasonable prudence.” In Russell v. Russell, 109 Conn. 187, 194 (1929), however, the court regarded the use of principal for improvement of real es | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences2008The § 8-2(a) regulation of "the location and use of buildings," and the § 7-148(c)(7)(A)(ii) "[r]egulat[ion][of] the mode of using any buildings," are similar to and not inconsistent with one another. "[T]he axiom that a specific statutory provision will ordinarily trump a general statutory provision cannot, by itself, displace the process of thoughtful and complete statutory interpretation. . . . [T]hat axiom does not appropriately apply in the present case." (Citation omitted.) Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of Education, 270 Conn. 665, 723 , 855 A.2d 212 (2004). 2008The § 8-2(a) regulation of "the location and use of buildings," and the § 7-148(c)(7)(A)(ii) "[r]egulat[ion][of] the mode of using any buildings," are similar to and not inconsistent with one another. "[T]he axiom that a specific statutory provision will ordinarily trump a general statutory provision cannot, by itself, displace the process of thoughtful and complete statutory interpretation. . . . [T]hat axiom does not appropriately apply in the present case." (Citation omitted.) Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of Education, 270 Conn. 665, 723 , 855 A.2d 212 (2004). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1999The plaintiff seems to argue that the court’s charge improperly omitted or failed to emphasize a reference to the requirement that the missing witness must have “peculiar or superior information . . . .” Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co., 147 Conn. 672, 675 , 165 A.2d 598 (1960). 1999The plaintiff seems to argue that the court’s charge improperly omitted or failed to emphasize a reference to the requirement that the missing witness must have “peculiar or superior information . . . .” Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co., 147 Conn. 672, 675 , 165 A.2d 598 (1960). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Palomba v. Gray
green
1 sentence1996The remaining asserted grounds are complaints concerning rulings on the admissibility of evidence and exceptions to the charge that do not identify adequate reasons to set aside the verdict under the standard set forth in Palomba v. Gray, 208 Conn. 21 , 24-25 (1988) and Labatt v. Grunewald, 182 Conn. 236 , 240 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Labatt v. Grunewald
green
1 sentence1996The remaining asserted grounds are complaints concerning rulings on the admissibility of evidence and exceptions to the charge that do not identify adequate reasons to set aside the verdict under the standard set forth in Palomba v. Gray, 208 Conn. 21 , 24-25 (1988) and Labatt v. Grunewald, 182 Conn. 236 , 240 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Root v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund
green
1 sentence1986See State v. Mason, supra, 584 ; State v. Maselli, 182 Conn. 66, 77-78 , 437 A.2d 836 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S. Ct. 868 , 66 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Ciaffoni v. Cowden
green
1 sentence1986See State v. Mason, supra, 584 ; State v. Maselli, 182 Conn. 66, 77-78 , 437 A.2d 836 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S. Ct. 868 , 66 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Zicarelli v. Dietz
green
1 sentence1986See State v. Mason, supra, 584 ; State v. Maselli, 182 Conn. 66, 77-78 , 437 A.2d 836 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S. Ct. 868 , 66 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Maselli
green
2 sentences1986See State v. Mason, supra, 584 ; State v. Maselli, 182 Conn. 66, 77-78 , 437 A.2d 836 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S. Ct. 868 , 66 L. 1986See State v. Mason, supra, 584 ; State v. Maselli, 182 Conn. 66, 77-78 , 437 A.2d 836 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1083 , 101 S. Ct. 868 , 66 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Cosgrove
green
2 sentences1983See State v. Mason, 186 Conn. 574, 583 , 442 A.2d 1335 (1982); State v. Cosgrove, 186 Conn. 476, 481 , 442 A.2d 1320 (1982). 1983See State v. Mason, 186 Conn. 574, 583 , 442 A.2d 1335 (1982); State v. Cosgrove, 186 Conn. 476, 481 , 442 A.2d 1320 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Santo v. Maynard
green
2 sentences1948However, the reference in the rule to pleading agency is merely in illustration of the qualification to the statement as to pleading acts and conduct by their legal effect, that the pleading should be such as fairly to apprise the adverse party of the state of facts which it is intended to prove; Santo v. Maynard, 57 Conn. 157, 161 , 17 A. 700 ; and the rule contains the express limitation that the fact of agency must be known to the pleader. 1948However, the reference in the rule to pleading agency is merely in illustration of the qualification to the statement as to pleading acts and conduct by their legal effect, that the pleading should be such as fairly to apprise the adverse party of the state of facts which it is intended to prove; Santo v. Maynard, 57 Conn. 157, 161 , 17 A. 700 ; and the rule contains the express limitation that the fact of agency must be known to the pleader. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.