Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1961–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Preveden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1969Co., supra [ 200 Minn. 523 , 274 N.W. 686 ]: "`The danger of admitting such testimony is apparent. 1967Co., supra [ 200 Minn. 523 , 274 N.W. 686 ]: “ ‘The danger of admitting such testimony is apparent. | 3 | 1961–1969 |
Ketchian v. Concannon
green
1 sentence1990As this court in Ketchian explained: The reason underlying this exception to the parol evidence rule is that oral evidence is generally permitted to be introduced to show that the parties, prior to or at the time they made a written contract of sale, entered into an agreement that such contract of sale should become operative only on the occurrence of a certain condition or contingency, the theory being that such evidence only goes to prove that the instrument never matured as a valid obligation, and hence there could be no modification or variance or contradiction of it as such. 435 So.2d at | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Dean v. Gold Coast Theatres, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989Dean, supra, points out the problem: [I]t appears that appellants' access to proof of the complaint is extremely limited while the defendants' access to proof of the absence of fraud and want of imputed knowledge of any fraud is far more unrestricted since the codefendants have a common interest and collectively know the real facts. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Chappell v. Hasche
neutral
1 sentence1983Chappell v. Hasche, 98 So.2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Spencer v. State
green
1 sentence1972Spencer v. State, 133 So.2d 729 (Fla.1961). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.