7 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridgegreen2 sentences2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). 2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Banigreen2 sentences2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). 2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). | 1 | 2 |
Slupecki v. Administrative Director of the Courtsgreen2 sentences2023Applying the Mathews factors here, first, it is clear that revocation of Tominaga's driver's license "raises significant due process property interests." Id. (citing Slupecki, 110 Hawai#i at 413, 133 P.3d at 1205 ). 2023Applying the Mathews factors here, first, it is clear that revocation of Tominaga's driver's license "raises significant due process property interests." Id. (citing Slupecki, 110 Hawai#i at 413, 133 P.3d at 1205 ). | 1 | 2 |
Zinermon v. Burchgreen2 sentences2023Bani, 97 Hawai#i at 296-97, 36 P.3d at 1266 -67 (quoting Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 127 (1990) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976))). 2023Bani, 97 Hawai#i at 296-97, 36 P.3d at 1266 -67 (quoting Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 127 (1990) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976))). | 1 | 2 |
Santosky v. Kramergreen2 sentences2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). 2026State v. Bani, 97 Hawaiʻi 285, 297, 36 P.3d 1255, 1267 (2001) (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758 (1982) (the Mathews balancing test 12 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** demonstrated that using the preponderance standard in parental terminations is “inconsistent with due process”). | 1 | 1 |
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.green2 sentences2014Therefore, even if the Mathews test is applied, counsel should always be appointed under the Hawai#i Constitution. 41 ***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** entire proceeding.’” Id. (quoting Note, A New Interest Balancing Test, at 282-83). 2014Therefore, even if the Mathews test is applied, counsel should always be appointed under the Hawai#i Constitution. 41 ***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** entire proceeding.’” Id. (quoting Note, A New Interest Balancing Test, at 282-83). | 1 | 1 |
Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2001Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 127 , 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 (1990) (quoting Mathews, 424 U.S. at 335 , 96 S.Ct. 893 ); Korean Buddhist Temple, 87 Hawai'i at 243 , 953 P.2d at 1341 (citations omitted). 2001Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 127 , 110 S.Ct. 975 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 (1990) (quoting Mathews, 424 U.S. at 335 , 96 S.Ct. 893 ); Korean Buddhist Temple, 87 Hawai'i at 243 , 953 P.2d at 1341 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Dixon v. Lovegreen2 sentences1993Id. at 112-15. 1993Id. at 112-15. | 1 | 1 |
MacKey v. Montrymgreen2 sentences1993Id. at 10. *24 The Court used the Mathews analysis to uphold the Massachusetts administrative revocation program and followed its decision in Love on the basis that Mackey , like Love , involved “a statutory scheme for administrative suspension of a driver’s license for statutorily defined cause without a presuspension hearing.” Id. at 11. 1993Id. at 10. *24 The Court used the Mathews analysis to uphold the Massachusetts administrative revocation program and followed its decision in Love on the basis that Mackey , like Love , involved “a statutory scheme for administrative suspension of a driver’s license for statutorily defined cause without a presuspension hearing.” Id. at 11. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RR
green
2 sentences2023Applying the Mathews factors here, first, it is clear that revocation of Tominaga's driver's license "raises significant due process property interests." Id. (citing Slupecki, 110 Hawai#i at 413, 133 P.3d at 1205 ). 2023Applying the Mathews factors here, first, it is clear that revocation of Tominaga's driver's license "raises significant due process property interests." Id. (citing Slupecki, 110 Hawai#i at 413, 133 P.3d at 1205 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.