Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Detention of Darlinggreen2 sentences2017We have previously found that there is “no constitutional bar to the civil confinement of sexually violent predators with untreatable conditions when confinement is necessary to protect the public.” Id. (quoting In re Det. of Darling, 712 N.W.2d 98, 101 (Iowa 2006)). 2017We have previously found that there is “no constitutional bar to the civil confinement of sexually violent predators with untreatable conditions when confinement is necessary to protect the public.” Id. (quoting In re Det. of Darling, 712 N.W.2d 98, 101 (Iowa 2006)). | 2 | 2 |
Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offendersgreen2 sentences2017The three factors from the Mathews test that a court must consider in a procedural due process analysis are (1) “the private interest that will be affected by the official action;” (2) “the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards;” and (3) “the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.” Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders, 737 N.W.2d 30 2017The three factors from the Mathews test that a court must consider in a procedural due process analysis are (1) “the private interest that will be affected by the official action;” (2) “the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards;” and (3) “the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.” Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders, 737 N.W.2d 30 | 2 | 2 |
State v. Maxwellgreen1 sentence2025See State v. Maxwell, 743 N.W.2d 185, 196 (Iowa 2008) (“[I]f the claim lacks the necessary prejudice, we can decide the case on the prejudice prong of the test without deciding whether the attorney performed deficiently.”). | 1 | 1 |
Dusenbery v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2023It “was first conceived in the context of a due process challenge to the adequacy of administrative procedures used to terminate Social Security disability benefits.” Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161, 167 (2002). 2023It “was first conceived in the context of a due process challenge to the adequacy of administrative procedures used to terminate Social Security disability benefits.” Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161, 167 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Detention of Williamsgreen2 sentences2023See In re Det. of Williams, 628 N.W.2d 447, 458 (Iowa 2001) (en banc). 2023See In re Det. of Williams, 628 N.W.2d 447, 458 (Iowa 2001) (en banc). | 1 | 1 |
Reesler v. K.C.green2 sentences2018See In re D.C.S.H.C. , 733 N.W.2d 902 , 910 (N.D. 2007) (recognizing the importance of parent's participation in entire proceeding, but declining to remand in part due to the court's inability to compel the out-of-state correctional facility to allow incarcerated parent to participate in entire hearing); see also In re Involuntary Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of C.G. , 954 N.E.2d 910 , 921-23 (Ind. 2011) (reviewing the approaches followed by courts in other jurisdictions). 2018See In re D.C.S.H.C. , 733 N.W.2d 902 , 910 (N.D. 2007) (recognizing the importance of parent's participation in entire proceeding, but declining to remand in part due to the court's inability to compel the out-of-state correctional facility to allow incarcerated parent to participate in entire hearing); see also In re Involuntary Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of C.G. , 954 N.E.2d 910 , 921-23 (Ind. 2011) (reviewing the approaches followed by courts in other jurisdictions). | 1 | 1 |
In Re CGgreen2 sentences2018See In re D.C.S.H.C. , 733 N.W.2d 902 , 910 (N.D. 2007) (recognizing the importance of parent's participation in entire proceeding, but declining to remand in part due to the court's inability to compel the out-of-state correctional facility to allow incarcerated parent to participate in entire hearing); see also In re Involuntary Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of C.G. , 954 N.E.2d 910 , 921-23 (Ind. 2011) (reviewing the approaches followed by courts in other jurisdictions). 2018See In re D.C.S.H.C. , 733 N.W.2d 902 , 910 (N.D. 2007) (recognizing the importance of parent's participation in entire proceeding, but declining to remand in part due to the court's inability to compel the out-of-state correctional facility to allow incarcerated parent to participate in entire hearing); see also In re Involuntary Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of C.G. , 954 N.E.2d 910 , 921-23 (Ind. 2011) (reviewing the approaches followed by courts in other jurisdictions). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2019Under the familiar tripartite Mathews test, the court considers (1) the nature of the interest involved; (2) “the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interests through the procedures used”; and (3) “the [g]overnment’s interest, including the function involved, and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirements would entail.” Id. 2019Under the familiar tripartite Mathews test, the court considers (1) the nature of the interest involved; (2) "the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interests through the procedures used"; and (3) "the [g]overnment's interest, including the function involved, and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirements would entail." Id. | 5 | 2017–2019 |
City of Sioux City v. Michael Jon Jacobsma
green
2 sentences2019Plaintiffs argue that they have a property interest in “not being subject to irrational monetary fines.” Jacobsma, 862 N.W.2d at 345 . 2019Plaintiffs argue that they have a property interest in "not being subject to irrational monetary fines." Jacobsma , 862 N.W.2d at 345 . | 3 | 2018–2019 |
State v. Hernandez-Lopez
green
2 sentences2012Hemandez-Lopez, 639 N.W.2d at 240 . 2012Hemandez-Lopez, 639 N.W.2d at 240 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.