7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lynn G. Lamasters Vs. State of Iowagreen2 sentences2022See Lamasters, 821 N.W.2d at 862 (requiring the issue to be both raised and ruled upon in order to be preserved). 14 When the State offered the knives collected at Harris’s arrest into evidence,10 including the butterfly knife, the following discussion occurred outside the presence of the jury: PROSECUTOR: . . . [T]he butterfly knife that is depicted in 55C, D, and E, as well as an actual exhibit 56, I’m not saying that’s not the murder weapon in this case, Your Honor. 2016See Lamasters v. State, 821 N.W.2d 856, 869 (Iowa 2012). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Quinngreen2 sentences2015See State v. Quinn, 691 N.W.2d 403, 407 (Iowa 2005). 2015See State v. Quinn, 691 N.W.2d 403, 407 (Iowa 2005). | 2 | 2 |
Estate of Harris v. Papa John's Pizzagreen2 sentences2023See id. at 680–81. 2023See id. at 680–81. | 1 | 1 |
Ledezma v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Ledezma v. State, 626 N.W.2d 134, 144 (Iowa 2001). 7 To the extent we are directly reviewing Harris’s claim the district court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal, we review the court’s decision for correction of errors at law. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gravesgreen1 sentence2015See State v. Graves, 668 N.W.2d 860, 868 (Iowa 2003). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strawgreen1 sentence2014To establish a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, Harris must show “(1) his trial counsel failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) this failure resulted in prejudice.” State v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 133 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.