7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Butera v. District of Columbiagreen2 sentences2025Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir. 1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055, 1062 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C. 2007Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir.1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055,1062 (9th Cir.2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“Regardless of the conduct at issue, however, the circuits have held that a key requirement for constitutional liability is affirmative conduct by the State to increase or create the danger that results in harm to the individual.”); Carlton v. Cleburne County | 2 | 2 |
Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of Columbusgreen2 sentences2025Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir. 1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055, 1062 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C. 2007Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir.1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055,1062 (9th Cir.2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“Regardless of the conduct at issue, however, the circuits have held that a key requirement for constitutional liability is affirmative conduct by the State to increase or create the danger that results in harm to the individual.”); Carlton v. Cleburne County | 2 | 2 |
Kennedy v. City of Ridgefieldgreen2 sentences2025Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir. 1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055, 1062 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C. 2007Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir.1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055,1062 (9th Cir.2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“Regardless of the conduct at issue, however, the circuits have held that a key requirement for constitutional liability is affirmative conduct by the State to increase or create the danger that results in harm to the individual.”); Carlton v. Cleburne County | 2 | 2 |
United States Court of Appeals,eighth Circuitgreen1 sentence2007Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir.1998); Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055,1062 (9th Cir.2006) (stating that there may be a due process violation when the governmental action affirmatively places the plaintiff in a dangerous situation.); Butera v. District of Columbia, 235 F.3d 637, 650 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“Regardless of the conduct at issue, however, the circuits have held that a key requirement for constitutional liability is affirmative conduct by the State to increase or create the danger that results in harm to the individual.”); Carlton v. Cleburne County | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ramon Wilberto Abreu-Cabreragreen1 sentence1997P. 35 advisory committee’s note); see United States v. Abreu-Cabrera, 64 F.3d 67, 73 (2nd Cir.1995) (“[S]econd thoughts, no matter how well intentioned, are not the sort of error that Rule 35(c) was designed to remedy.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Colorado v. Connelly
green
2 sentences2010A statement rendered by one in the condition of respondent might be proved to be quite unreliable, but this is a matter to be governed, by the evidentiary laws of the forum. 479 U.S. at 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 (emphasis supplied). 2010A statement rendered by one in the condition of respondent might be proved to be quite unreliable, but this is a matter to be governed, by the evidentiary laws of the forum. 479 U.S. at 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 (emphasis supplied). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
United States v. Ceccolini
green
2 sentences2001The issue cannot be decided on the basis of causation in the logical sense alone, but necessarily includes other elements as well. *808 Id. at 274 , 98 S.Ct. at 1059 , 55 L.Ed.2d at 276 . 2001The issue cannot be decided on the basis of causation in the logical sense alone, but necessarily includes other elements as well. *808 Id. at 274 , 98 S.Ct. at 1059 , 55 L.Ed.2d at 276 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Richards Furniture Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1989“Choice of organization, dress, and equipment for law enforcement personnel is a decision entitled to the same sort of presumption of legislative validity as are state choices designed to promote other aims within the cogni *198 zance of the State’s police power.” [emphasis added, footnotes omitted] The Court of Appeals in Richards Furniture v. Board, 233 Md. 249, 261 , 196 A.2d 621 (1963), stated: However, an act which has been duly authenticated and published as law ... bears a strong presumption that all constitutional provisions have been complied with, and it has been validly enacted into 1989“Choice of organization, dress, and equipment for law enforcement personnel is a decision entitled to the same sort of presumption of legislative validity as are state choices designed to promote other aims within the cogni *198 zance of the State’s police power.” [emphasis added, footnotes omitted] The Court of Appeals in Richards Furniture v. Board, 233 Md. 249, 261 , 196 A.2d 621 (1963), stated: However, an act which has been duly authenticated and published as law ... bears a strong presumption that all constitutional provisions have been complied with, and it has been validly enacted into | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Panitz v. Comptroller of the Treasury & State Treasurer
green
2 sentences1989“Choice of organization, dress, and equipment for law enforcement personnel is a decision entitled to the same sort of presumption of legislative validity as are state choices designed to promote other aims within the cogni *198 zance of the State’s police power.” [emphasis added, footnotes omitted] The Court of Appeals in Richards Furniture v. Board, 233 Md. 249, 261 , 196 A.2d 621 (1963), stated: However, an act which has been duly authenticated and published as law ... bears a strong presumption that all constitutional provisions have been complied with, and it has been validly enacted into 1989“Choice of organization, dress, and equipment for law enforcement personnel is a decision entitled to the same sort of presumption of legislative validity as are state choices designed to promote other aims within the cogni *198 zance of the State’s police power.” [emphasis added, footnotes omitted] The Court of Appeals in Richards Furniture v. Board, 233 Md. 249, 261 , 196 A.2d 621 (1963), stated: However, an act which has been duly authenticated and published as law ... bears a strong presumption that all constitutional provisions have been complied with, and it has been validly enacted into | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Young v. State
green
1 sentence1977App. 291, 294 , quoting McCormick, Evidence § 190 at 453 (2nd ed.): “ ‘[S]ome of the wiser opinions (especially recent ones) recognize that the problem is not merely one of pigeonholing, but one of balancing, on the one side, the actual need for the other crimes evidence in the light of the issues and the other evidence available to the prosecution, the convincingness of the evidence that the other crimes were committed and that the accused was the actor, and the strength or weakness of the other crimes evidence in supporting the issue, and on the other, the degree to which the jury will proba | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.