10 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1945–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Salernogreen2 sentences2015Even "facial challenges," moreover, may require fact-intensive analysis, in that such challenges require a litigant to "establish that no set of cireumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid." United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987). 186 If this is the sort of claim the majority means to preserve under criminal rule 22(e), the court has not succeeded in adopting a "limited" standard. 2015Even "facial challenges," moreover, may require fact-intensive analysis, in that such challenges require a litigant to "establish that no set of cireumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid." United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987). 186 If this is the sort of claim the majority means to preserve under criminal rule 22(e), the court has not succeeded in adopting a "limited" standard. | 2 | 2 |
Migliore v. Livingston Financial, LLCgreen2 sentences2017See Migliore, 2015 UT 9, ¶ 29 , 347 P.3d 394 . 2017See Migliore, 2015 UT 9, ¶ 29 , 347 P.3d 394 . | 1 | 1 |
Sheffield v. Turnergreen2 sentences1987See Sheffield v. Turner, 21 Utah 2d 314 , 445 P.2d 367 (1968) (a prisoner’s suit based on negligent supervision of other prisoners was barred, in part, because the injury arose out of “incarceration in a state prison,” another category of negligent claims for which immunity is retained). 1987See Sheffield v. Turner, 21 Utah 2d 314 , 445 P.2d 367 (1968) (a prisoner’s suit based on negligent supervision of other prisoners was barred, in part, because the injury arose out of “incarceration in a state prison,” another category of negligent claims for which immunity is retained). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maddocks v. Salt Lake City Corp.
green
2 sentences1993In that case, we held that the “plaintiffs negligence claim arises out of battery and false imprisonment and is therefore not the sort of claim for which immunity has been waived.” Id. *1166 at 1340. 1993In Maddocks , the plaintiff sued the city for alleged beatings administered by police officers who were city employees, and this court stated that the “plaintiff’s negligence claim arises out of battery and false imprisonment and is therefore not the sort of claim for which immunity has been waived.” Id. at 1340 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
cluster 10847881
green
1 sentence2026Specifically, the ALJ decided to cut Spjute’s fees in half, after determining that it was “reasonable” to conclude “that the workload” between Hinojos’s and Second Claimant’s claims “would be close to an even split.” The Commission affirmed that ruling. ¶28 We are not prepared to hold that this analysis represented an abuse of the Commission’s discretion to determine the amount of reasonable attorney fees that should be awarded to a claimant. 20250064-CA 12 2026 UT App 63 Future Community Services, Inc. v. Labor Commission While the ALJ and the Commission will be free to revisit this analysis | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Rodrigues
green
2 sentences2017Accordingly, because the claimed error is “the result of judicial reasoning and decision making,” see Rodrigues, 2009 UT 62, ¶ 14 , 218 P.3d 610 , it is not the sort of error correctible under rule 30(b), and the district court was correct to deny Defendant’s rule 30(b) motion. 4 III. 2017Accordingly, because the claimed error is “the result of judicial reasoning and decision making,” see Rodrigues, 2009 UT 62, ¶ 14 , 218 P.3d 610 , it is not the sort of error correctible under rule 30(b), and the district court was correct to deny Defendant’s rule 30(b) motion. 4 III. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
United States v. Allied Oil Corp.
green
1 sentence2015Even "facial challenges," moreover, may require fact-intensive analysis, in that such challenges require a litigant to "establish that no set of cireumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid." United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987). 186 If this is the sort of claim the majority means to preserve under criminal rule 22(e), the court has not succeeded in adopting a "limited" standard. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ledfors v. Emery County School District
green
2 sentences1996In that case, we held that the "plaintiff's negligence claim arises out of battery and false imprisonment and is therefore not the sort of claim for which immunity has been waived." 849 P.2d at 1165 . 1996In that case, we held that the “plaintiffs negligence claim arises out of battery and false imprisonment and is therefore not the sort of claim for which immunity has been waived.” 849 P.2d at 1165 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Burch
green
2 sentences1945I paid my respects to this sort of a test in my concurring opinion in *140 the case of State v. Burch, 100 Utah 414 , 115 P. 2d 911 , at page 913. 1945I paid my respects to this sort of a test in my concurring opinion in *140 the case of State v. Burch, 100 Utah 414 , 115 P. 2d 911 , at page 913. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.