indemnification claim (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

indemnification claim in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Goettman v. North Fork Valley Restaurantgreen
colo · 2007 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Although the “unique burdens” of defending oneself in a foreign legal system have “significant weight in assessing the reasonableness of stretching the long arm ... over national borders,” when minimum contacts exist “often the interests of the plaintiff and the forum in the exercise of jurisdiction will justify even the serious burdens placed on the alien defendant.” Asahi, 480 U.S. at 114 , 107 S.Ct. 1026 (noting that in that case, the plaintiffs and forum’s interests in adjudicating an indemnification claim between two alien corporations were slight); see Goettman, 176 P.3d at 71 .

11
Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. Bonzigreen
cal · 1964 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. Bonzi, 60 Cal.2d 834 , 36 Cal.Rptr. 741 , 389 P.2d 133 (1964); see also Restatement (Second) of Agency, supra, § 438 cmts. d (right of agent who fails to provide timely notice of an indemnification claim is "diminished to the extent that the principal, because of the delay, has been unable to obtain redress against third persons or has otherwise changed his position") & e ("If the agent does not notify the principal and give him an opportunity to defend, he can recover the amount paid upon the claim only if he proves that he made a reasonable defense; if ... he s

2001See Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. Bonzi, 60 Cal.2d 834 , 36 Cal.Rptr. 741 , 389 P.2d 133 (1964); see also Restatement (Second) of Agency, supra, § 438 cmts. d (right of agent who fails to provide timely notice of an indemnification claim is "diminished to the extent that the principal, because of the delay, has been unable to obtain redress against third persons or has otherwise changed his position") & e ("If the agent does not notify the principal and give him an opportunity to defend, he can recover the amount paid upon the claim only if he proves that he made a reasonable defense; if ... he s

11
Noel v. Jonesgreen
colo · 1960 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See Mendez v. Pavich, 159 Colo. 409, 411-12 , 412 P.2d 228 , 224 (1966) (instruction-that is so erroneous that it would probably lead jury into error requires retrial); see also Noel v. Jones, 142 Colo. 318, 320 , 350 P.2d 815, 816 (1960) (reversal required where conflicting instructions leave appellate court unable to determine which instruction the jury followed).

1986See Mendez v. Pavich, 159 Colo. 409, 411-12 , 412 P.2d 228 , 224 (1966) (instruction-that is so erroneous that it would probably lead jury into error requires retrial); see also Noel v. Jones, 142 Colo. 318, 320 , 350 P.2d 815, 816 (1960) (reversal required where conflicting instructions leave appellate court unable to determine which instruction the jury followed).

11
Mendez v. Pavichgreen
colo · 1966 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986See Mendez v. Pavich, 159 Colo. 409, 411-12 , 412 P.2d 228 , 224 (1966) (instruction-that is so erroneous that it would probably lead jury into error requires retrial); see also Noel v. Jones, 142 Colo. 318, 320 , 350 P.2d 815, 816 (1960) (reversal required where conflicting instructions leave appellate court unable to determine which instruction the jury followed).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC v. Summit Flooring, LLC green
coloctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2025Moreover, the division in Boulder Plaza also emphasized that the indemnification clause at 33 issue lacked the “liabilities” and “in any way” language. 198 P.3d at 1222 (citing Pub.

12025–2025
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

2010Although the “unique burdens” of defending oneself in a foreign legal system have “significant weight in assessing the reasonableness of stretching the long arm ... over national borders,” when minimum contacts exist “often the interests of the plaintiff and the forum in the exercise of jurisdiction will justify even the serious burdens placed on the alien defendant.” Asahi, 480 U.S. at 114 , 107 S.Ct. 1026 (noting that in that case, the plaintiffs and forum’s interests in adjudicating an indemnification claim between two alien corporations were slight); see Goettman, 176 P.3d at 71 .

2010Although the “unique burdens” of defending oneself in a foreign legal system have “significant weight in assessing the reasonableness of stretching the long arm ... over national borders,” when minimum contacts exist “often the interests of the plaintiff and the forum in the exercise of jurisdiction will justify even the serious burdens placed on the alien defendant.” Asahi, 480 U.S. at 114 , 107 S.Ct. 1026 (noting that in that case, the plaintiffs and forum’s interests in adjudicating an indemnification claim between two alien corporations were slight); see Goettman, 176 P.3d at 71 .

12010–2010
Black v. Black green
me · 2004
1 sentence

2006As the Maine court stated in Black v. Black, supra, 842 A.2d at 1285 n. 5, enforcement is not dependent on the separation agreement’s containing a savings clause or covenant of good faith and fair dealing when, as here, a spouse’s postjudgment actions render the distribution of property a nullity.

12006–2006
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance green
ariz · 1982
2 sentences

1986Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Co., 133 Ariz. 395 , 652 P.2d 134 (1982).

1986Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Co., 133 Ariz. 395 , 652 P.2d 134 (1982).

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

NY 344 (1962–2026) CT 67 (1976–2017) CA 59 (1959–2025) NJ 42 (1960–2026) OH 38 (1975–2026) MA 37 (1976–2026) IL 35 (1968–2026) FL 34 (1973–2025) DE 34 (1978–2026) IN 31 (1977–2025) PA 31 (1984–2024) GA 24 (1974–2025) TX 24 (1969–2026) NM 21 (1976–2021) WA 18 (1984–2025) MI 17 (1980–2025) IA 16 (1994–2023) MO 15 (1982–2015) VA 13 (1992–2026) MD 13 (1985–2019) MN 11 (1957–2025) DC 11 (1983–2011) ME 10 (1994–2019) VT 10 (1978–2026) MT 8 (1972–2008) LA 7 (1972–2010) UT 7 (1989–2018) RI 6 (1983–2011) WI 6 (1984–2021) CO 6 (1986–2025) AZ 6 (1969–2024) AL 6 (2000–2017) KS 6 (1978–2020) NC 6 (2002–2017) OR 6 (2005–2013) AK 5 (1981–2020) NE 5 (1973–2022) OK 5 (1989–2011) SC 4 (2003–2019) NV 3 (2009–2012) AR 2 (2013–2013) TN 2 (2008–2013) KY 2 (2005–2007) NH 2 (1999–2006) ID 2 (1977–2009) MS 2 (2004–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check