Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barrons v. J. H. Findorff & Sons, Inc.green1 sentence2021Id. at 448, 455-56 . | 1 | 1 |
Chernin v. International Oil Co.green2 sentences1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve 1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
Illinois Central Railroad v. Blahagreen2 sentences1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve 1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
McStain Corporation v. ELFLINE PLUMBING & HEAT.green1 sentence1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
Cochrane Roofing & Metal Co. v. Callahangreen1 sentence1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
Jorgenson v. Northern States Power Co.green2 sentences1998See Jorgenson v. Northern States Power Co., 60 Wis. 2d 29, 34-35 , 208 N.W.2d 323, 325-326 (1973) (collecting authorities). 1998See Jorgenson v. Northern States Power Co., 60 Wis. 2d 29, 34-35 , 208 N.W.2d 323, 325-326 (1973) (collecting authorities). | 1 | 1 |
Carroll v. National Surety Co.green1 sentence1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
Southern Railway Co. v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.green1 sentence1998Winga, Esq., who appears with Mr. Anderson on that brief, that false and misleading statements in briefs filed in court contravene not only Rule 802.05(l)(a) but also SCR 20:3.3, which requires candor toward tribunals. 4 Compare Chernin v. International Oil Co., 261 Wis. 543, 546 , 53 N.W.2d 425, 427 (1952) (specific "tender" of defense to indemnitor will not be read into contract that does not require it; no allegation that indemnitor lacked either notice or actual knowledge) with Cochrane Roofing & Metal Company, Inc. v. Callahan, 472 So. 2d 1005, 1007 (Ala. 1985) (timely notice required eve | 1 | 1 |
Kjellsen v. Stonecrest, Inc.green2 sentences1984Kjellsen v. Stonecrest, Inc., 47 Wis. 2d 8, 11 , 176 N.W.2d 321, 323 (1970). 1984Kjellsen v. Stonecrest, Inc., 47 Wis. 2d 8, 11 , 176 N.W.2d 321, 323 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019If it turns out that there are unintended tax consequences and if such consequences are not fully covered by the Segregated Trust, the issue can be addressed at a later date. ¶65 As to whether the circuit court had the authority to impose the indemnification clause, the objectors contend that the only possible authority is the law of equitable indemnification articulated in Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc. , 2012 WI 70 , 342 Wis. 2d 29 , 816 N.W.2d 853 . 2019If it turns out that there are unintended tax consequences and if such consequences are not fully covered by the Segregated Trust, the issue can be addressed at a later date. ¶65 As to whether the circuit court had the authority to impose the indemnification clause, the objectors contend that the only possible authority is the law of equitable indemnification articulated in Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc. , 2012 WI 70 , 342 Wis. 2d 29 , 816 N.W.2d 853 . | 2 | 2019–2021 |
Premier Health Partners v. NBBJ, L.L.C.
green
2 sentences2019The contract's indemnification clause specified that NBBJ would hold the hospital harmless for all damages "to the extent they arise from NBBJ's negligent acts or omissions in the performance of its services." Id. 2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Hastreiter v. Karau Buildings, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994There, as in the present case, the appellant argued that "an indemnification clause should not be construed to provide for indemnification of a party from the effects of his own negligence without clear and unequivocal language." Hastreiter, 57 Wis. 2d at 748 , 205 N.W.2d at 163 . 1994There, as in the present case, the appellant argued that "an indemnification clause should not be construed to provide for indemnification of a party from the effects of his own negligence without clear and unequivocal language." Hastreiter, 57 Wis. 2d at 748 , 205 N.W.2d at 163 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Bialas v. Portage County
green
1 sentence1994In fact, Bialas v. Portage County, 70 Wis. 2d 910 , 236 N.W.2d 218 (1975), relied upon by Heritage, illustrates this point. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.