Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dean v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2010See Breiner v. Daka, Inc., 806 A.2d 180, 184 (D.C.2002) (holding that a request for attorney’s fees did not relate to a “pending” ease when “all proceedings involving the merits of the case had concluded in the trial court by that time”); see also Dean v. United States, 938 A.2d 751, 769 (D.C.2007) (noting that “where the change to the rule immediately precluded the petitioner from filing a timely motion ... it would be neither just nor practicable to apply the new time frame”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2862 , 174 L.Ed.2d 581 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Breiner v. Daka, Inc.green1 sentence2010See Breiner v. Daka, Inc., 806 A.2d 180, 184 (D.C.2002) (holding that a request for attorney’s fees did not relate to a “pending” ease when “all proceedings involving the merits of the case had concluded in the trial court by that time”); see also Dean v. United States, 938 A.2d 751, 769 (D.C.2007) (noting that “where the change to the rule immediately precluded the petitioner from filing a timely motion ... it would be neither just nor practicable to apply the new time frame”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2862 , 174 L.Ed.2d 581 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Bowlergreen1 sentence2007See, e.g., United States v. Bowler, 252 F.3d 741, 746 (5th Cir.2001) (application of new rule would have required defendant to have filed a new trial motion within five months before the rule was amended). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Mark A. Maraghgreen2 sentences1992See United States v. Maragh, 282 U.S.App.D.C. at 258 , 894 F.2d at 417 (“seizure” inquiry a question of law); but see id. at 262-63 , 894 F.2d at 421-22 (Mikva, J., dissenting) (question whether police seized person “essentially factual” and should be reviewed under clearly erroneous standard). 1992See United States v. Maragh, 282 U.S.App.D.C. at 258 , 894 F.2d at 417 (“seizure” inquiry a question of law); but see id. at 262-63 , 894 F.2d at 421-22 (Mikva, J., dissenting) (question whether police seized person “essentially factual” and should be reviewed under clearly erroneous standard). | 1 | 1 |
Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. ZON. COM'N, ETC.green1 sentence1988See generally Citizens Ass’n v. Zoning Comm’n, 392 A.2d 1027 (D.C. 1978) (en banc) (Georgetown III). | 1 | 1 |
Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences1982Rather it should select a test year that appears likely to be representative of the future. [ 402 A.2d at 18-19 (footnotes and citations omitted).] The Commission followed this mandate in Formal Case No. 685. 1982Rather it should select a test year that appears likely to be representative of the future. [ 402 A.2d at 18-19 (footnotes and citations omitted).] The Commission followed this mandate in Formal Case No. 685. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Mark A. Maraghgreen2 sentences1992See United States v. Maragh, 282 U.S.App.D.C. at 258 , 894 F.2d at 417 (“seizure” inquiry a question of law); but see id. at 262-63 , 894 F.2d at 421-22 (Mikva, J., dissenting) (question whether police seized person “essentially factual” and should be reviewed under clearly erroneous standard). 1992See United States v. Maragh, 282 U.S.App.D.C. at 258 , 894 F.2d at 417 (“seizure” inquiry a question of law); but see id. at 262-63 , 894 F.2d at 421-22 (Mikva, J., dissenting) (question whether police seized person “essentially factual” and should be reviewed under clearly erroneous standard). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sheridan v. Sheridan
green
1 sentence1979In the exercise of that discretion, the trial court must find “a substantial change in the requirement of the minor children.” Id. 4 In order to complete the syllogism, appellant does not argue that the children’s financial situation has not changed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.