6 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity Nat.green1 sentence2011See Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity Nat’l, 05-1508, 05-1527, p. 11 (La.7/10/06), 948 So.2d 84, 92 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Irons v. US Bank, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2012Irons v. U.S. Bank, Inc., 07-0570, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/14/07), 966 So.2d 646, 648 . l9The City also cites to Bradley v. Theus, 28,714 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/20/96), 668 So.2d 1304 , which was a case concerning the objection to the candidacy of a mayoral aspirant. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Bradley v. Theus
green
1 sentence2012Irons v. U.S. Bank, Inc., 07-0570, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/14/07), 966 So.2d 646, 648 . l9The City also cites to Bradley v. Theus, 28,714 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/20/96), 668 So.2d 1304 , which was a case concerning the objection to the candidacy of a mayoral aspirant. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Mamon
green
1 sentence2011In State v. Mamon, 26,337, pp. 16-17 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/16/94) , 648 So.2d 1347, 1358 , writ denied, 95-0220 (La.6/2/95), 654 So.2d 1104 , the Second Circuit Court of Appeal recognized that on appellate review it had to analyze whether the reasons given after a Batson challenge really were race-neutral and whether the trial court properly assessed the weight and credibility of each explanation. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. MAMOM
green
1 sentence2011In State v. Mamon, 26,337, pp. 16-17 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/16/94) , 648 So.2d 1347, 1358 , writ denied, 95-0220 (La.6/2/95), 654 So.2d 1104 , the Second Circuit Court of Appeal recognized that on appellate review it had to analyze whether the reasons given after a Batson challenge really were race-neutral and whether the trial court properly assessed the weight and credibility of each explanation. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Johnson v. Canale
green
2 sentences2007In support, they cite Strickland v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University and Agr. and Mechanical College, 432 So.2d 964 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983), and Johnson v. Canale, 00-89 (La.App. 5 Cir. 10/18/00) , 769 So.2d 833 . 2007Johnson, 00-89 at p. 7, 769 So.2d at 836 (citing Strickland, supra ). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Strickland v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF LA. ST. UNIV.
green
2 sentences2007In support, they cite Strickland v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University and Agr. and Mechanical College, 432 So.2d 964 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983), and Johnson v. Canale, 00-89 (La.App. 5 Cir. 10/18/00) , 769 So.2d 833 . 2007Johnson, 00-89 at p. 7, 769 So.2d at 836 (citing Strickland, supra ). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2001State v. Johnson, supra. Even were we to conclude that counsel’s actions in failing to object to the timing of the hearing were somehow deficient, our finding of good cause for the continuance, based upon the evidence and arguments presented at the motion to dismiss, eliminates the possibility of KG.’s pre-trial release. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Walker v. Kroop
green
1 sentence1998Nevertheless, the amendments do not effect a change in the burden of proof, and expressly provide that the burden "shall remain with the mover." McKey v. General Motors Corporation, 96-0755, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/14/97); 691 So.2d 164, 167 ; see also, Walker v. Kroop, 96-0618, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/24/96); 678 So.2d 580, 583-84 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
McKey v. General Motors Corp.
green
1 sentence1998Nevertheless, the amendments do not effect a change in the burden of proof, and expressly provide that the burden "shall remain with the mover." McKey v. General Motors Corporation, 96-0755, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/14/97); 691 So.2d 164, 167 ; see also, Walker v. Kroop, 96-0618, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/24/96); 678 So.2d 580, 583-84 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.