Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2020See, e.g., State v. Wilson, 128 N.C. 2020See, e.g., State v. Wilson, 128 N.C. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Wallgreen2 sentences2020App. 196, 200 , 760 S.E.2d 386, 388 (2014) (holding the State’s failure to file its statement of charges consistent with the timing requirement in N.C. 2020App. 196, 200 , 760 S.E.2d 386, 388 (2014) (holding the State’s failure to file its statement of charges consistent with the timing requirement in N.C. | 3 | 3 |
Dixon v. Lovegreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Dixon v. Love, 431 U.S. 105 , 113-15, 97 S.Ct. 1723 , 1727-29, 52 L.Ed.2d 172 (1977) (truck drivers' license). 2015See, e.g., Dixon v. Love, 431 U.S. 105 , 113-15, 97 S.Ct. 1723 , 1727-29, 52 L.Ed.2d 172 (1977) (truck drivers' license). | 1 | 1 |
Roush v. Kennongreen1 sentence2008Cf. Roush v. Kennon, ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 656 S.E.2d 603, 607-08 (2008) (holding that an expert can comply with the timing requirement if an expert's research, even after his or her deposition, revealed that the standard of care in his or her community was the same or similar to the standard of care in the community in which he or she is testifying when the injury occurred). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilson
green
2 sentences1998Furthermore, assuming arguendo that the timing requirement of N.C.G.S. § 15A-952(b) applies to motions for joinder made by the State, “it is within the discretion of a trial judge to permit pre-trial motions to be filed at a later time than set out in the statute.” Wilson, 57 N.C. 1998App. at 447 , 291 S.E.2d at 832 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.