6 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aguilar v. Texasred2 sentences1980The Aguilar-Spinelli test is derived from Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; and Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d *496 637. 1980The Aguilar-Spinelli test is derived from Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; and Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d *496 637. | 2 | 4 |
Spinelli v. United Statesred2 sentences1980The Aguilar-Spinelli test is derived from Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; and Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d *496 637. 1980The Aguilar-Spinelli test is derived from Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; and Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d *496 637. | 2 | 4 |
Illinois v. Gatesgreen2 sentences2020Marks, ¶¶ 14, 18 (clarifying seemingly inconsistent precedential references to “substantial basis” standard of review as “the same thing as” a conclusion of “sufficient probable cause”); Marks, ¶¶ 16-20; United States v. Hicks, 575 F.3d 130, 136 (1st Cir. 2009); Velardi v. Walsh, 40 F.3d 569, 574 (2d Cir. 1994); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1391 (8th Cir. 1993). 6 information test); Gates, 462 U.S. at 229-44 , 103 S. Ct. at 2328-36 (rejecting rigid Aguilar-Spinelli test for informat information).8 Consequently, contrary to Grandchamp’s assertion, the totality of the circumstances 2020Marks, ¶¶ 14, 18 (clarifying seemingly inconsistent precedential references to “substantial basis” standard of review as “the same thing as” a conclusion of “sufficient probable cause”); Marks, ¶¶ 16-20; United States v. Hicks, 575 F.3d 130, 136 (1st Cir. 2009); Velardi v. Walsh, 40 F.3d 569, 574 (2d Cir. 1994); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1391 (8th Cir. 1993). 6 information test); Gates, 462 U.S. at 229-44 , 103 S. Ct. at 2328-36 (rejecting rigid Aguilar-Spinelli test for informat information).8 Consequently, contrary to Grandchamp’s assertion, the totality of the circumstances | 1 | 2 |
Mary Velardi and Frances Velardi v. Cornelius R. Walsh, Jr. And Robert L. Boekgreen1 sentence2020Marks, ¶¶ 14, 18 (clarifying seemingly inconsistent precedential references to “substantial basis” standard of review as “the same thing as” a conclusion of “sufficient probable cause”); Marks, ¶¶ 16-20; United States v. Hicks, 575 F.3d 130, 136 (1st Cir. 2009); Velardi v. Walsh, 40 F.3d 569, 574 (2d Cir. 1994); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1391 (8th Cir. 1993). 6 information test); Gates, 462 U.S. at 229-44 , 103 S. Ct. at 2328-36 (rejecting rigid Aguilar-Spinelli test for informat information).8 Consequently, contrary to Grandchamp’s assertion, the totality of the circumstances | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Hicksgreen1 sentence2020Marks, ¶¶ 14, 18 (clarifying seemingly inconsistent precedential references to “substantial basis” standard of review as “the same thing as” a conclusion of “sufficient probable cause”); Marks, ¶¶ 16-20; United States v. Hicks, 575 F.3d 130, 136 (1st Cir. 2009); Velardi v. Walsh, 40 F.3d 569, 574 (2d Cir. 1994); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1391 (8th Cir. 1993). 6 information test); Gates, 462 U.S. at 229-44 , 103 S. Ct. at 2328-36 (rejecting rigid Aguilar-Spinelli test for informat information).8 Consequently, contrary to Grandchamp’s assertion, the totality of the circumstances | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Kevin Dale Riedeselgreen1 sentence2020Marks, ¶¶ 14, 18 (clarifying seemingly inconsistent precedential references to “substantial basis” standard of review as “the same thing as” a conclusion of “sufficient probable cause”); Marks, ¶¶ 16-20; United States v. Hicks, 575 F.3d 130, 136 (1st Cir. 2009); Velardi v. Walsh, 40 F.3d 569, 574 (2d Cir. 1994); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1391 (8th Cir. 1993). 6 information test); Gates, 462 U.S. at 229-44 , 103 S. Ct. at 2328-36 (rejecting rigid Aguilar-Spinelli test for informat information).8 Consequently, contrary to Grandchamp’s assertion, the totality of the circumstances | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Erler
neutral
2 sentences1985For discussions of that test, see Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S. Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 ; and State v. Erler (Mont.1983), [ 207 Mont. 88 ,] 672 P.2d 624 , 40 St. 1985For discussions of that test, see Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S. Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 ; and State v. Erler (Mont.1983), [ 207 Mont. 88 ,] 672 P.2d 624 , 40 St. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Leighty
green
2 sentences1980State v. Jackson (1979), 180 Mont. 195 , 589 P.2d 1009 ; State v. Leighty (1978), 179 Mont. 366 , 588 P.2d 526 . 1980State v. Jackson (1979), 180 Mont. 195 , 589 P.2d 1009 ; State v. Leighty (1978), 179 Mont. 366 , 588 P.2d 526 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1980State v. Jackson (1979), 180 Mont. 195 , 589 P.2d 1009 ; State v. Leighty (1978), 179 Mont. 366 , 588 P.2d 526 . 1980State v. Jackson (1979), 180 Mont. 195 , 589 P.2d 1009 ; State v. Leighty (1978), 179 Mont. 366 , 588 P.2d 526 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State ex rel. Townsend v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
neutral
2 sentences1978State ex rel Townsend v. District Court (1975), 168 Mont. 357, 361 , 543 P.2d 193 . 1978State ex rel Townsend v. District Court (1975), 168 Mont. 357, 361 , 543 P.2d 193 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State Ex Rel. Townsend v. DIST. CT. OF 4TH JD
green
2 sentences1978State ex rel Townsend v. District Court (1975), 168 Mont. 357, 361 , 543 P.2d 193 . 1978State ex rel Townsend v. District Court (1975), 168 Mont. 357, 361 , 543 P.2d 193 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.