44 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spinelli v. United Statesred2 sentences1996For that reason, the fact patterns of cases discussed herein are not necessarily relevant and may not be fully described.) In State v. Barton, Id., the Supreme Court reviewed the Connecticut and federal law on arrests and searches based on information provided by unnamed informants, and the following is a synopsis of that review: Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (1969), established the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test for determining whether information provided by a confidential informant constitutes probable cause. 1996For that reason, the fact patterns of cases discussed herein are not necessarily relevant and may not be fully described.) In State v. Barton, Id., the Supreme Court reviewed the Connecticut and federal law on arrests and searches based on information provided by unnamed informants, and the following is a synopsis of that review: Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (1969), established the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test for determining whether information provided by a confidential informant constitutes probable cause. | 4 | 10 |
State v. Kimbrogreen2 sentences2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. 2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. | 2 | 20 |
State v. Ruscoegreen2 sentences1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). 1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). | 1 | 4 |
Big Eagle v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). 1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). | 1 | 4 |
Rodriguez v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). 1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). | 1 | 4 |
Ruscoe v. Connecticutgreen2 sentences1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). 1994Even under the Aguilar-Spinelli test where the reliability of the confidential informant was insufficient, probable cause would still be found if the warrant application affidavit set forth other circumstances — typically independent police CT Page 4235 corroboration of certain details provided by the informant — that bolster the deficiencies State v. Ruscoe, 212 Conn. 223 , 229 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1144 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Morrillgreen2 sentences1994"The Aguilar-Spinelli test . . . consists of two prongs: "`The issuing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.'" State v. Morrill, supra, 566 . 1994"The Aguilar-Spinelli test . . . consists of two prongs: "`The issuing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.'" State v. Morrill, supra, 566 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Perrygreen2 sentences1992After first accepting the Illinois v. Gates “totality of the circumstances” test; see State v. Perry, 195 Conn. 505, 508 , 488 A.2d 1256 (1985); State v. Gasparro, 194 Conn. 96, 106 , 480 A.2d 509 (1984); it later ruled that article first, § 7, of our state constitution required adherence to the Aguilar-Spinelli test. 1992After first accepting the Illinois v. Gates “totality of the circumstances” test; see State v. Perry, 195 Conn. 505, 508 , 488 A.2d 1256 (1985); State v. Gasparro, 194 Conn. 96, 106 , 480 A.2d 509 (1984); it later ruled that article first, § 7, of our state constitution required adherence to the Aguilar-Spinelli test. | 1 | 2 |
| State v. Bembergreen | 1 | 2 |
| State v. Velascogreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Fergusongreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Arthur Pressleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Jonesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Ryersongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Uptongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Velezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Delmonaco
green
2 sentences1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. 1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. | 12 | 1986–1991 |
S. E. Johnson Co. v. Arthur S. Langenderfer, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. 1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. | 12 | 1986–1991 |
Spaulding v. University of Washington
green
2 sentences1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. 1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. | 12 | 1986–1991 |
Berkovitz v. Islamic Republic of Iran
green
2 sentences1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. 1990“The Aguilar-Spinelli test for reviewing a finding of probable cause consists of two prongs: ‘ “The issu ing [judge] must be informed of (1) some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information to the affiant; and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the affiant concluded (a) that the informant, whose identity need not even be disclosed, was credible, or (b) that his information was reliable.” ’ State v. Delmonaco, 194 Conn. 331, 338 , 481 A.2d 40 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S. Ct. 511 , 83 L. | 12 | 1986–1991 |
Aguilar v. Texas
red
2 sentences2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. 2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. | 10 | 1984–2021 |
State v. Barton
green
2 sentences2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. 2021In State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), overruled in part by State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 , 594 A.2d 917 (1991), a divided Supreme Court3 concluded, as a matter of state constitutional law, that article first, § 7, required application of ‘‘the more spe- cific standards of the Aguilar-Spinelli test’’;4 see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L. | 9 | 1992–2021 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences2008In 1983, “[i]n Illinois v. Gates, supra, 462 U.S. 213 , the United States Supreme Court recognized an underlying flaw in the application of the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis. 2008In 1983, “[i]n Illinois v. Gates, supra, 462 U.S. 213 , the United States Supreme Court recognized an underlying flaw in the application of the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis. | 9 | 1988–2008 |
Gray v. Lucas, Warden, Et Al.
green
2 sentences1996Those prongs are: 1) Is there a "basis of knowledge" for the information provided, such as personal observation by the informant; and, 2) does the informant have veracity, or, in the alternative, has the information provided been shown in some manner (such as corroboration by independent police investigation) to be reliable; Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 (1983), found the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test overly restrictive and declared that, under the United States Constitution, if the two prongs cannot be met, probable cause CT Page 5256-ZZ can nonetheless stil 1996Those prongs are: 1) Is there a "basis of knowledge" for the information provided, such as personal observation by the informant; and, 2) does the informant have veracity, or, in the alternative, has the information provided been shown in some manner (such as corroboration by independent police investigation) to be reliable; Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 (1983), found the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test overly restrictive and declared that, under the United States Constitution, if the two prongs cannot be met, probable cause CT Page 5256-ZZ can nonetheless stil | 4 | 1988–1996 |
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. 1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. | 4 | 1986–1988 |
Dorsey v. United States
green
2 sentences1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. 1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. | 4 | 1986–1988 |
Varnell v. Beto
green
2 sentences1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. 1988Ed. 2d 401 (1984), [quoting] State v. Jackson, 162 Conn. 440, 446 , 294 A.2d 517 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S. Ct. 198 , 34 L. | 4 | 1986–1988 |
Seath v. Regulations & Permits Administration
green
2 sentences1990Ed. 2d 527 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S. Ct. 33 , 77 L. 1990Ed. 2d 527 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S. Ct. 33 , 77 L. | 3 | 1988–1990 |
Harris v. Harris
green
2 sentences1990Ed. 2d 527 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S. Ct. 33 , 77 L. 1990Ed. 2d 527 , reh. denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S. Ct. 33 , 77 L. | 3 | 1988–1990 |
State v. Respass
green
2 sentences2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. 2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Gray v. Knowles
green
2 sentences2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. 2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Respass v. Connecticut
green
2 sentences2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. 2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Galle v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
green
2 sentences2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. 2021When the information supplied by the informant fails to satisfy the Aguilar-Spinelli test, probable cause may still be found if the warrant application affidavit sets forth other circumstances— typically independent police corroboration of certain details provided by the informant—that bolster the deficiencies.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 174 n.12, 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Novembrino
green
2 sentences1999In support of his contention that evidence (hat would have supported a finding of probable cause under the Aguilar-Spinelli test (i.e., evidence establishing an informant’s “veracity” or “reliability” and “basis of knowledge”) does not necessarily require a finding of probable cause under the totality of circumstances test, the defendant makes reference to the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987). 1999In support of his contention that evidence (hat would have supported a finding of probable cause under the Aguilar-Spinelli test (i.e., evidence establishing an informant’s “veracity” or “reliability” and “basis of knowledge”) does not necessarily require a finding of probable cause under the totality of circumstances test, the defendant makes reference to the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987). | 2 | 1993–1999 |
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1991See also Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363, 373 , 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985) (rejecting the “ ‘unacceptably shapeless and permissive’ ” Gates approach and retaining the Aguilar-Spinelli test on state constitutional grounds); State v. Jackson, 102 Wash. 432, 435 , 688 P.2d 136 (1984) (retaining Aguilar-Spinelli under the Washington constitution in lieu of the “nebulous” Gates approach). 1991See also Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363, 373 , 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985) (rejecting the “ ‘unacceptably shapeless and permissive’ ” Gates approach and retaining the Aguilar-Spinelli test on state constitutional grounds); State v. Jackson, 102 Wash. 432, 435 , 688 P.2d 136 (1984) (retaining Aguilar-Spinelli under the Washington constitution in lieu of the “nebulous” Gates approach). | 2 | 1991–1993 |
State v. Gasparro
green
2 sentences1992After first accepting the Illinois v. Gates “totality of the circumstances” test; see State v. Perry, 195 Conn. 505, 508 , 488 A.2d 1256 (1985); State v. Gasparro, 194 Conn. 96, 106 , 480 A.2d 509 (1984); it later ruled that article first, § 7, of our state constitution required adherence to the Aguilar-Spinelli test. 1992After first accepting the Illinois v. Gates “totality of the circumstances” test; see State v. Perry, 195 Conn. 505, 508 , 488 A.2d 1256 (1985); State v. Gasparro, 194 Conn. 96, 106 , 480 A.2d 509 (1984); it later ruled that article first, § 7, of our state constitution required adherence to the Aguilar-Spinelli test. | 2 | 1985–1992 |
| State v. Martin green | 2 | 1986–1989 |
State v. Garcia
green
2 sentences1989The trial court considered the affidavit that supported the warrant according to the standards for probable cause set forth in State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), 2 which applied the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test. 3 This test requires that a court analyze: “ ‘ “(1) the basis of the informant’s knowledge — the means by which he acquired his information, and (2) the underlying facts establishing either his general veracity or his reliability in the particular case.” ’ State v. Garcia, [ 7 Conn. App. 354, 358 , 508 A.2d 824 (1986)], quoting State v. Martin, 2 Conn. App. 1989The trial court considered the affidavit that supported the warrant according to the standards for probable cause set forth in State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), 2 which applied the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test. 3 This test requires that a court analyze: “ ‘ “(1) the basis of the informant’s knowledge — the means by which he acquired his information, and (2) the underlying facts establishing either his general veracity or his reliability in the particular case.” ’ State v. Garcia, [ 7 Conn. App. 354, 358 , 508 A.2d 824 (1986)], quoting State v. Martin, 2 Conn. App. | 2 | 1988–1989 |
| Connecticut v. Martin green | 2 | 1986–1989 |
| MacLeod v. County of Santa Clara green | 2 | 1986–1989 |
Valmet Oy v. Beloit Corp.
green
2 sentences1989The trial court considered the affidavit that supported the warrant according to the standards for probable cause set forth in State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), 2 which applied the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test. 3 This test requires that a court analyze: “ ‘ “(1) the basis of the informant’s knowledge — the means by which he acquired his information, and (2) the underlying facts establishing either his general veracity or his reliability in the particular case.” ’ State v. Garcia, [ 7 Conn. App. 354, 358 , 508 A.2d 824 (1986)], quoting State v. Martin, 2 Conn. App. 1989The trial court considered the affidavit that supported the warrant according to the standards for probable cause set forth in State v. Kimbro, 197 Conn. 219, 236 , 496 A.2d 498 (1985), 2 which applied the two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test. 3 This test requires that a court analyze: “ ‘ “(1) the basis of the informant’s knowledge — the means by which he acquired his information, and (2) the underlying facts establishing either his general veracity or his reliability in the particular case.” ’ State v. Garcia, [ 7 Conn. App. 354, 358 , 508 A.2d 824 (1986)], quoting State v. Martin, 2 Conn. App. | 2 | 1986–1989 |
| State v. Ross green | 2 | 1985–1986 |
| State v. Torres green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Adams green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Torres neutral | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Velasco neutral | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Duntz green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| State v. Hunter neutral | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| State v. Adams green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Lang green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Stephens green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Schmitt v. State green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Jaroma green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Kelly green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Ricci green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| State v. Hlavacek green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.