Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Gatesgreen2 sentences1993Utah courts, however, have used the Aguilar-Spinelli factors as guides in applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test. “[A]n informant’s ‘reliability’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are but two relevant considerations, among others, in determining the existence of probable cause under ‘a totality-of-the circumstances.’ ” Hansen, 732 P.2d at 130 (citing Gates, 462 U.S. at 231-32, 235-36 , 103 S.Ct. at 2328-31 ). 1993Utah courts, however, have used the Aguilar-Spinelli factors as guides in applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test. “[A]n informant’s ‘reliability’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are but two relevant considerations, among others, in determining the existence of probable cause under ‘a totality-of-the circumstances.’ ” Hansen, 732 P.2d at 130 (citing Gates, 462 U.S. at 231-32, 235-36 , 103 S.Ct. at 2328-31 ). | 3 | 7 |
Salt Lake City v. Trujillogreen2 sentences1997See State v. Lee, 863 P.2d 49, 57 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (declining to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test and make Aguilar-Spi-nelli doctrine a standard required by Utah Constitution in examining affidavits supporting search warrants); State v. Singleton, 854 P.2d 1017, 1021-22 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (refusing to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test, and stating that both Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court have expressed preference for totality-of-the-circumstances test when reviewing probable cause determinations); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608-09 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) ( 1997App.1993) (declining to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test and make Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine a standard required by Utah Constitution in examining affidavits supporting search warrants); State v. Singleton, 854 P.2d 1017, 1021-22 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (refusing to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test, and stating that both Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court have expressed preference for totality-of-the-circumstances test when reviewing probable cause determinations); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608-09 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (declining to hold that Aguilar-Spinelli doct | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hansengreen2 sentences1993Utah courts, however, have used the Aguilar-Spinelli factors as guides in applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test. “[A]n informant’s ‘reliability’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are but two relevant considerations, among others, in determining the existence of probable cause under ‘a totality-of-the circumstances.’ ” Hansen, 732 P.2d at 130 (citing Gates, 462 U.S. at 231-32, 235-36 , 103 S.Ct. at 2328-31 ). 1993Utah courts, however, have used the Aguilar-Spinelli factors as guides in applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test. “[A]n informant’s ‘reliability’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ are but two relevant considerations, among others, in determining the existence of probable cause under ‘a totality-of-the circumstances.’ ” Hansen, 732 P.2d at 130 (citing Gates, 462 U.S. at 231-32, 235-36 , 103 S.Ct. at 2328-31 ). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Rosenbaumgreen2 sentences1993Accordingly, we decline to hold that the Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine is required under the Utah Constitution. 7 See State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964-66 (Utah App.1993) (noting that the Utah Supreme Court has never chosen to return to the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis for the purpose of the Utah Constitution); State v. Weaver, 817 P.2d 830, 835 (Utah App.1991) (declining to determine whether Utah Constitution requires Aguilar-Spinelli). 1993Accordingly, we decline to hold that the Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine is required under the Utah Constitution. 7 See State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964-66 (Utah App.1993) (noting that the Utah Supreme Court has never chosen to return to the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis for the purpose of the Utah Constitution); State v. Weaver, 817 P.2d 830, 835 (Utah App.1991) (declining to determine whether Utah Constitution requires Aguilar-Spinelli). | 2 | 2 |
Spinelli v. United Statesred2 sentences1991Second, she argues that Article I, Section 14 should be interpreted consistently with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), the so-called Aguilar-Spinelli test. 1991Second, she argues that Article I, Section 14 should be interpreted consistently with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), the so-called Aguilar-Spinelli test. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Jordangreen2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jordan, 665 P.2d 1280, 1286 (Utah 1983) (applying two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test requiring an affiant demonstrate both basis of knowledge and reliability/veracity). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jordan, 665 P.2d 1280, 1286 (Utah 1983) (applying two-pronged Aguilar-Spinelli test requiring an affiant demonstrate both basis of knowledge and reliability/veracity). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andertongreen1 sentence2003This has not been the law in Utah since 1983, when State v. Anderton, 668 P.2d 1258, 1260-61 (Utah 1983), first applied the "totality-of-the-circumstances test" required by Gates, 462 U.S. at 238 , 103 S.Ct. at 2332 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Leegreen1 sentence1997See State v. Lee, 863 P.2d 49, 57 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (declining to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test and make Aguilar-Spi-nelli doctrine a standard required by Utah Constitution in examining affidavits supporting search warrants); State v. Singleton, 854 P.2d 1017, 1021-22 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (refusing to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test, and stating that both Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court have expressed preference for totality-of-the-circumstances test when reviewing probable cause determinations); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608-09 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) ( | 1 | 1 |
State v. Singletongreen2 sentences1997See State v. Lee, 863 P.2d 49, 57 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (declining to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test and make Aguilar-Spi-nelli doctrine a standard required by Utah Constitution in examining affidavits supporting search warrants); State v. Singleton, 854 P.2d 1017, 1021-22 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (refusing to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test, and stating that both Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court have expressed preference for totality-of-the-circumstances test when reviewing probable cause determinations); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608-09 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) ( 1997App.1993) (declining to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test and make Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine a standard required by Utah Constitution in examining affidavits supporting search warrants); State v. Singleton, 854 P.2d 1017, 1021-22 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (refusing to reject totality-of-the-circumstances test, and stating that both Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court have expressed preference for totality-of-the-circumstances test when reviewing probable cause determinations); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608-09 (Utah.Ct.App.1993) (declining to hold that Aguilar-Spinelli doct | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1997See id. at 321 ; see also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 228-29 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2327 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). 1997See id. at 321 ; see also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 228-29 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2327 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thurmangreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., State v. Thurman, 846 P.2d 1256, 1259-60 (Utah 1993); State v. Hansen, 732 P.2d 127, 130 (Utah 1987); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608 (Utah App.1993); State v. White, 851 P.2d 1195, 1197-99 (Utah App.1993); State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964 (Utah App.1993); State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). 1993See, e.g., State v. Thurman, 846 P.2d 1256, 1259-60 (Utah 1993); State v. Hansen, 732 P.2d 127, 130 (Utah 1987); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608 (Utah App.1993); State v. White, 851 P.2d 1195, 1197-99 (Utah App.1993); State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964 (Utah App.1993); State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pursergreen2 sentences1993See also State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). 1993See also State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Weavergreen2 sentences1993Accordingly, we decline to hold that the Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine is required under the Utah Constitution. 7 See State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964-66 (Utah App.1993) (noting that the Utah Supreme Court has never chosen to return to the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis for the purpose of the Utah Constitution); State v. Weaver, 817 P.2d 830, 835 (Utah App.1991) (declining to determine whether Utah Constitution requires Aguilar-Spinelli). 1993Accordingly, we decline to hold that the Aguilar-Spinelli doctrine is required under the Utah Constitution. 7 See State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964-66 (Utah App.1993) (noting that the Utah Supreme Court has never chosen to return to the Aguilar-Spinelli analysis for the purpose of the Utah Constitution); State v. Weaver, 817 P.2d 830, 835 (Utah App.1991) (declining to determine whether Utah Constitution requires Aguilar-Spinelli). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Whitegreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., State v. Thurman, 846 P.2d 1256, 1259-60 (Utah 1993); State v. Hansen, 732 P.2d 127, 130 (Utah 1987); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608 (Utah App.1993); State v. White, 851 P.2d 1195, 1197-99 (Utah App.1993); State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964 (Utah App.1993); State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). 1993See, e.g., State v. Thurman, 846 P.2d 1256, 1259-60 (Utah 1993); State v. Hansen, 732 P.2d 127, 130 (Utah 1987); Salt Lake City v. Trujillo, 854 P.2d 603, 608 (Utah App.1993); State v. White, 851 P.2d 1195, 1197-99 (Utah App.1993); State v. Rosenbaum, 845 P.2d 962, 964 (Utah App.1993); State v. Purser, 828 P.2d 515, 517 (Utah App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aguilar v. Texas
red
2 sentences1991Second, she argues that Article I, Section 14 should be interpreted consistently with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), the so-called Aguilar-Spinelli test. 1991Second, she argues that Article I, Section 14 should be interpreted consistently with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), the so-called Aguilar-Spinelli test. | 2 | 1991–1993 |
Massachusetts v. Upton
green
2 sentences1987Defendants ignore Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and Massachusetts v. Upton, 466 U.S. 727 , 104 S.Ct. 2085 , 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984), in which the United States Supreme Court abandoned Aguilar-Spinelli as a litmus test to determine the adequacy of an affidavit supporting the finding of probable cause to issue a warrant. 3 Search warrant affidavits are to be construed in a common-sense, reasonable manner. 1987Defendants ignore Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and Massachusetts v. Upton, 466 U.S. 727 , 104 S.Ct. 2085 , 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984), in which the United States Supreme Court abandoned Aguilar-Spinelli as a litmus test to determine the adequacy of an affidavit supporting the finding of probable cause to issue a warrant. 3 Search warrant affidavits are to be construed in a common-sense, reasonable manner. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.