6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cofieldgreen2 sentences2016Cofield, 129 N.C.App. at 279 , 498 S.E.2d at 831 (citations omitted). 2016Cofield, 129 N.C.App. at 279 , 498 S.E.2d at 831 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barnesgreen2 sentences2008See Scott, 356 N.C. at 596 , 573 S.E.2d at 869 ("'Contradictions and discrepancies do not warrant dismissal of the case but are for the jury to resolve.'" (quoting State v. Barnes, 334 N.C. 67, 75 , 430 S.E.2d 914, 918 (1993))). 2008See Scott, 356 N.C. at 596 , 573 S.E.2d at 869 ("'Contradictions and discrepancies do not warrant dismissal of the case but are for the jury to resolve.'" (quoting State v. Barnes, 334 N.C. 67, 75 , 430 S.E.2d 914, 918 (1993))). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Scottgreen2 sentences2008See Scott, 356 N.C. at 596 , 573 S.E.2d at 869 ("'Contradictions and discrepancies do not warrant dismissal of the case but are for the jury to resolve.'" (quoting State v. Barnes, 334 N.C. 67, 75 , 430 S.E.2d 914, 918 (1993))). 2008See Scott, 356 N.C. at 596 , 573 S.E.2d at 869 ("'Contradictions and discrepancies do not warrant dismissal of the case but are for the jury to resolve.'" (quoting State v. Barnes, 334 N.C. 67, 75 , 430 S.E.2d 914, 918 (1993))). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1996The test governing the submission of this statutory mitigating circumstance is “ ‘whether a rational jury could conclude that defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity.’ ” State v. Walker, 343 N.C. 216, 223 , 469 S.E.2d 919, 922 (quoting State v. Wilson, 322 N.C. 117, 143 , 367 S.E.2d 589, 604 (1988)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 L. 1996The test governing the submission of this statutory mitigating circumstance is “ ‘whether a rational jury could conclude that defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity.’ ” State v. Walker, 343 N.C. 216, 223 , 469 S.E.2d 919, 922 (quoting State v. Wilson, 322 N.C. 117, 143 , 367 S.E.2d 589, 604 (1988)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Walkergreen2 sentences1996The test governing the submission of this statutory mitigating circumstance is “ ‘whether a rational jury could conclude that defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity.’ ” State v. Walker, 343 N.C. 216, 223 , 469 S.E.2d 919, 922 (quoting State v. Wilson, 322 N.C. 117, 143 , 367 S.E.2d 589, 604 (1988)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 L. 1996The test governing the submission of this statutory mitigating circumstance is “ ‘whether a rational jury could conclude that defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity.’ ” State v. Walker, 343 N.C. 216, 223 , 469 S.E.2d 919, 922 (quoting State v. Wilson, 322 N.C. 117, 143 , 367 S.E.2d 589, 604 (1988)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. . Cashgreen2 sentences1980A diagnosis of mental illness by an expert is not in and of itself conclusive on the issue of insanity." (Citations omitted.) State v. Leonard, 296 N.C. 58, 64-65 , 248 S.E.2d 853, 856-57 (1978). *639 "The burden of this plea (of insanity) is upon the defendant . . . to show it to the satisfaction of the jury." (Citation omitted.) State v. Cash, 219 N.C. 818, 822 , 15 S.E.2d 277, 279 (1941). 1980A diagnosis of mental illness by an expert is not in and of itself conclusive on the issue of insanity." (Citations omitted.) State v. Leonard, 296 N.C. 58, 64-65 , 248 S.E.2d 853, 856-57 (1978). *639 "The burden of this plea (of insanity) is upon the defendant . . . to show it to the satisfaction of the jury." (Citation omitted.) State v. Cash, 219 N.C. 818, 822 , 15 S.E.2d 277, 279 (1941). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Leonardgreen2 sentences1980A diagnosis of mental illness by an expert is not in and of itself conclusive on the issue of insanity." (Citations omitted.) State v. Leonard, 296 N.C. 58, 64-65 , 248 S.E.2d 853, 856-57 (1978). *639 "The burden of this plea (of insanity) is upon the defendant . . . to show it to the satisfaction of the jury." (Citation omitted.) State v. Cash, 219 N.C. 818, 822 , 15 S.E.2d 277, 279 (1941). 1980A diagnosis of mental illness by an expert is not in and of itself conclusive on the issue of insanity." (Citations omitted.) State v. Leonard, 296 N.C. 58, 64-65 , 248 S.E.2d 853, 856-57 (1978). *639 "The burden of this plea (of insanity) is upon the defendant . . . to show it to the satisfaction of the jury." (Citation omitted.) State v. Cash, 219 N.C. 818, 822 , 15 S.E.2d 277, 279 (1941). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2015App. at __, 743 S.E.2d at 81–82. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Norwood
green
2 sentences2001Defendant cites State v. Norman, 76 N.C.App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim's credibility was error. 2001App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim’s credibility was error. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Sanders
neutral
2 sentences2001Defendant cites State v. Norman, 76 N.C.App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim's credibility was error. 2001App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim’s credibility was error. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Norman
neutral
2 sentences2001Defendant cites State v. Norman, 76 N.C.App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim's credibility was error. 2001Defendant cites State v. Norman, 76 N.C.App. 623 , 334 S.E.2d 247 , rev. denied, 315 N.C. 188 , 337 S.E.2d 863 (1985), to argue expert testimony offered to bolster the victim's credibility was error. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.