Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arndt v. City of Le Clairegreen2 sentences2026See id. at 394 . 2012Deputy Commissioner Wal-shire found a discrepancy between “the history provided by Dr. Garrels” and the “testimony of claimant and his spouse.” It is the commissioner’s “duty as the trier of fact to determine the credibility of witnesses.” Arndt v. City of Le Claire, 728 N.W.2d 389, 395 (Iowa 2007). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Goodingreen1 sentence2020People v. Camel, No. 290270, 2010 WL 199612 , at *3 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2010) (unpublished) (citations omitted) (quoting People v. Goodin, 668 N.W.2d 392, 396 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Groffgreen1 sentence2018“Probable cause to issue a search warrant exists ‘when the facts and circumstances presented to the judicial officer are sufficient in themselves to justify the belief of a reasonably cautious person that an offense has been or is being committed.’” State v. Groff, 323 N.W.2d 204, 212 (Iowa 1982) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strawgreen1 sentence2017See id. at 137 (refusing to adopt a per se rule of prejudice in the context of guilty pleas “because such a rule would force us to 3 accept conclusory claims of prejudice without the benefit of a true review of the circumstances surrounding the plea”). | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Chicago, Great Western Railway Co.green2 sentences1987Co., 140 Iowa 332, 337-38 , 118 N.W. 390, 392 (1908), the defendant objected to a credibility instruction because it did not “more specifically advise the jury as to the perjury of the plaintiff.” Id. 1987Co., 140 Iowa 332, 337-38 , 118 N.W. 390, 392 (1908), the defendant objected to a credibility instruction because it did not “more specifically advise the jury as to the perjury of the plaintiff.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Briggsgreen2 sentences1983On the other hand, a favorableness showing has been required and deemed not to have been satisfied where the assertion was “speculative,” People v. Briggs, 81 A.D.2d 1017, 1017-18 , 440 N.Y.S.2d 143, 144-45 (1981), or where the evidence would bear only on the credibility of test results. 1983On the other hand, a favorableness showing has been required and deemed not to have been satisfied where the assertion was “speculative,” People v. Briggs, 81 A.D.2d 1017, 1017-18 , 440 N.Y.S.2d 143, 144-45 (1981), or where the evidence would bear only on the credibility of test results. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Larson Manufacturing Co. v. Thorson
green
1 sentence2012Thorson, 763 N.W.2d at 850 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Turpin v. State
green
1 sentence1983Turpin v. State, 606 S.W.2d 907 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.