Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
General Electric Co. v. Paul Forsell & Son, Inc.green2 sentences1996Co. v. Paul Forsell Son, Inc., 121 R.I. 19 , 394 A.2d 1101 , 1103 (1978)(holding that binding effect of admission necessary to allow party to rely on it); Fleitz v. Van Westrienen, 114 Ariz. 246 , 560 P.2d 430 (App. 1977)(holding that Rule 36 admissions "fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them"); Airco Indus. 1996Co. v. Paul Forsell Son, Inc., 121 R.I. 19 , 394 A.2d 1101 , 1103 (1978)(holding that binding effect of admission necessary to allow party to rely on it); Fleitz v. Van Westrienen, 114 Ariz. 246 , 560 P.2d 430 (App. 1977)(holding that Rule 36 admissions "fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them"); Airco Indus. | 2 | 2 |
Estate of Williams v. City of Jacksongreen1 sentence2026Williams v. City of Jackson, 844 So. 2d 1161, 1165 (¶15) (Miss. 2003) (“In order for recovery from a governmental entity to be barred because of the victim’s 16 We therefore disagree with the dissent’s assertions that the evidence was “undisputed.” As to the credibility of the evidence, we do not challenge the officers’ credibility in our analysis; that is for the Appellants to argue on remand. | 1 | 1 |
Pitchford v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Pitchford v. State, 45 So.3d 216, 234 (¶ 67) (Miss. 2010); Dora, 986 So.2d at 921 (¶ 8). ¶ 61. | 1 | 1 |
Dora v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Pitchford v. State, 45 So.3d 216, 234 (¶ 67) (Miss. 2010); Dora, 986 So.2d at 921 (¶ 8). ¶ 61. | 1 | 1 |
Easter v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Easter, 83 So.3d at 444 (¶ 8). 9 Moreover, the prosecutor’s closing arguments reflect nothing more than a comment on the credibility of the defense’s evidence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2024Further, McVay relies on Smith, 457 So. 2d at 336 , for his argument that a “tactic of accusation through questioning” subjects a defendant “to such irrelevant, inflammatory and prejudicial evidence as to deny [defendant] his right to a fair and impartial trial.” In Smith, the State attempted multiple times at trial to impeach the credibility of defense witnesses with questions that amounted to “sneers and innuendo.” Id. at 334 . 2024Further, McVay relies on Smith, 457 So. 2d at 336 , for his argument that a “tactic of accusation through questioning” subjects a defendant “to such irrelevant, inflammatory and prejudicial evidence as to deny [defendant] his right to a fair and impartial trial.” In Smith, the State attempted multiple times at trial to impeach the credibility of defense witnesses with questions that amounted to “sneers and innuendo.” Id. at 334 . | 2 | 2006–2024 |
The American Automobile Association (Incorporated) v. Aaa Legal Clinic Of Jefferson Crooke
green
2 sentences1996Ass'n v. AAA Legal Clinic, 930 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir.1991) (holding that admission not withdrawn or amended cannot be rebutted by contrary testimony or subjected to a credibility analysis); General Elec. 1996Ass'n v. AAA Legal Clinic, 930 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that admission not withdrawn or amended cannot be rebutted by contrary testimony or subjected to a credibility analysis); General Elec. | 2 | 1994–1996 |
Fleitz v. Van Westrienen
green
2 sentences1996Co. v. Paul Forsell Son, Inc., 121 R.I. 19 , 394 A.2d 1101 , 1103 (1978)(holding that binding effect of admission necessary to allow party to rely on it); Fleitz v. Van Westrienen, 114 Ariz. 246 , 560 P.2d 430 (App. 1977)(holding that Rule 36 admissions "fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them"); Airco Indus. 1996Co. v. Paul Forsell Son, Inc., 121 R.I. 19 , 394 A.2d 1101 , 1103 (1978)(holding that binding effect of admission necessary to allow party to rely on it); Fleitz v. Van Westrienen, 114 Ariz. 246 , 560 P.2d 430 (App. 1977)(holding that Rule 36 admissions "fall within the category of judicial admissions which preclude attempts to dispute the admitted fact or to submit evidence to disprove them"); Airco Indus. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.