arbitrary and capricious standard (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

arbitrary and capricious standard in Nevada

6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Knapp v. Stategreen
nev · 1995 · cited in 4 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018Knapp, 111 Nev. at 423 , 892 P.2d at 577 (internal quotation marks omitted).

2018Knapp, 111 Nev. at 423 , 892 P.2d at 577 (internal quotation marks omitted).

44
O'Keefe v. Stategreen
nev · 2018 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020O'Keefe v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 134 Nev. 752 , 755, 431 P.3d 350, 353 (2018).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Clark County Education Ass'n v. Clark County School District green
nev · 2006
2 sentences

2017The arbitrary and capricious standard "ensures that the arbitrator does not disregard the facts or the terms of the arbitration agreement." Id.

2017Under this standard, this court's review "is limited to whether the arbitrator's findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record." Id. at 344 , 131 P.3d at 9 - 10.

12017–2017

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.135 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 284.383 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 284.385 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 284.390 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 284.300 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 154 (1973–2026) WA 95 (1976–2026) WY 90 (1989–2024) LA 51 (1987–2026) MS 35 (1991–2024) TX 35 (1990–2025) NJ 35 (1992–2026) CA 34 (1977–2026) AL 25 (2000–2026) MD 25 (1980–2024) MA 19 (1977–2023) IN 18 (1987–2019) KS 17 (1984–2020) RI 17 (2002–2019) IL 16 (1978–2020) WV 14 (1995–2025) MN 13 (1986–2019) MT 11 (1989–2025) WI 10 (1977–2015) MI 9 (1984–2026) AK 8 (1990–1997) UT 8 (1983–2024) HI 8 (2014–2021) TN 7 (2002–2022) NC 6 (1989–2004) NV 6 (2017–2020) NM 6 (1992–2025) FL 5 (1981–2010) CO 4 (1994–1996) DE 3 (1995–2021) VA 3 (1982–2001) PA 3 (1999–2026) OK 3 (2003–2018) AR 2 (1993–2025) OR 2 (2023–2023) OH 2 (1989–1999) VT 2 (2019–2021) SC 2 (1996–2021) ME 2 (1989–2005) ND 2 (2018–2018) KY 2 (1987–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check