6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. Millergreen2 sentences2016An extensive review of the law has shown that courts of this Commonwealth have not specifically addressed whether SORNA’s registration and notification provisions are narrowly tailored to meet the government’s compelling interest in protecting the public.16 Nor have courts assessed whether the public distribution of a sexual offender’s personal information on a government website violates 16 In Doe v. Miller, 886 A.2d 310, 314 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005), we dismissed a class action claim that Megan’s Law II violated class members’ substantive due process rights. 2016In Doe v. Miller, 886 A.2d 310, 314 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005), we dismissed a class action claim that Megan's Law II violated class members’ substantive due process rights. | 1 | 1 |
Cutler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.green2 sentences2011Compare Cutler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 175 Md.App. 177 , 927 A.2d 1 (2007), and cases cited therein, denying class certification where the courts do not liberally construe the class action rule. 2011Compare Cutler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 175 Md.App. 177 , 927 A.2d 1 (2007), and cases cited therein, denying class certification where the courts do not liberally construe the class action rule. | 1 | 1 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopezgreen1 sentence2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. | 1 | 1 |
Brunda v. Home Insurancegreen2 sentences2000See Brunda v. Home Insurance Co., 353 Pa.Super. 146 , 509 A.2d 377 (1986) (holding that it was not error for trial court to decertify a class action where claim of only named representative plaintiff was barred by the statute of limitations). 2000See Brunda v. Home Insurance Co., 353 Pa.Super. 146 , 509 A.2d 377 (1986) (holding that it was not error for trial court to decertify a class action where claim of only named representative plaintiff was barred by the statute of limitations). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harrison v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. 2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Basco v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
cluster 796653
green
2 sentences2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. 2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. 2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Gonzalez
green
2 sentences2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. 2011Maryland does not share the liberal construction of the class action rule espoused by the Ninth Circuit in Dukes [v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007)] and by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Iliadis [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88 , 922 A.2d 710 (2007)]. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Petty v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. 2011The more exacting analysis of the class certification requirements in [Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 93 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Tex.App.2002)], Basco [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 592 (E.D.La.2002)], Petty [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 148 Ohio App.3d 348 , 773 N.E.2d 576 (2002)], Harrison [v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 170 N.C.App. 545 , 613 S.E.2d 322 (2005)] is more closely aligned with the Court of Appeals's interpretation of Md. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
DiLucido v. Terminix International, Inc.
green
2 sentences1998It strikes me that the interpretation of Rule 313 by this Court in DiLucido v. Terminix, 450 Pa.Super. 393 , 676 A.2d 1237 (Pa.Super.1996), alio, denied, 546 Pa. 655 , 684 A.2d 557 (1996), requires that this panel find that an appeal from an order dismissing the class action claim of appellants is immediately appealable pursuant to Rule 313. 1998It strikes me that the interpretation of Rule 313 by this Court in DiLucido v. Terminix, 450 Pa.Super. 393 , 676 A.2d 1237 (Pa.Super.1996), alio, denied, 546 Pa. 655 , 684 A.2d 557 (1996), requires that this panel find that an appeal from an order dismissing the class action claim of appellants is immediately appealable pursuant to Rule 313. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Shapiro v. Magaziner
green
2 sentences1992In Shapiro v. Magaziner, 418 Pa. 278 , 210 A.2d 890 (1965), the court, in construing the former class action rule Pa.R.C.P. 1992In Shapiro v. Magaziner, 418 Pa. 278 , 210 A.2d 890 (1965), the court, in construing the former class action rule Pa.R.C.P. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Garnet Valley School District v. Hanlon
green
2 sentences1979Garnet Valley School District v. Hanlon, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 476 , 327 A. 2d 215 (1974), is a case cited by the committee as having precedential value insofar as it was decided under the former class action rule but is consistent with provisions under the new rule. 1979Garnet Valley School District v. Hanlon, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 476 , 327 A. 2d 215 (1974), is a case cited by the committee as having precedential value insofar as it was decided under the former class action rule but is consistent with provisions under the new rule. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.