5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Little Rock v. Cashgreen2 sentences1992This court in the City of Little Rock v. Cash, 277 Ark. 494 , 644 S.W.2d 229 (1982), answered this question in the affirmative. 1992This court in the City of Little Rock v. Cash, 277 Ark. 494 , 644 S.W.2d 229 (1982), answered this question in the affirmative. | 1 | 2 |
McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.green1 sentence2015Tobacco Co., 522 F.3d 215, 228 (2d Cir. 2008). 4 The plaintiffs counter that they are entitled to damages for buying a product that was not as represented—that is, a safer, healthier, and less addictive cigarette. 4 Philip Morris further cites Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., where we held that a class- action claim failed to state a cause of action under the ADTPA because no actual damages lie where the only injury complained of is a diminution in value. 362 Ark. 317 , 208 S.W.3d 153 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jorja Trading, Inc.; Automatic Auto Finance, Inc.; Cashfish Motor Pawn, Inc.; Virginia Rivers; Monte Johnston; And John Does 1–10 v. Leah Willis and Adrian Bartholomew
green
2 sentences2024Id. at 6–9, 598 S.W.3d at 6–7. 2024Id. at 6–9, 598 S.W.3d at 6–7. | 2 | 2021–2024 |
Wallis v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2015Philip Morris further cites Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., where we held that a class-action claim failed to state a cause of action under the ADTPA because no actual damages lie where the only injury complained of is a diminution in value. 362 Ark. 317 , 208 S.W.3d 153 (2005). 2015Philip Morris further cites Wallis v. Ford Motor Co., where we held that a class-action claim failed to state a cause of action under the ADTPA because no actual damages lie where the only injury complained of is a diminution in value. 362 Ark. 317 , 208 S.W.3d 153 (2005). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.