Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McGinnis v. State
green
1 sentence2013McGinnis v. State, 28 Tenn. (9 Hum.) 43 , 47-48 (1848); see also 9 David Louis Ray-bin, Tennessee Practice: Criminal Practice and Procedure § 9.3, at 268 (2008) [hereinafter Raybin] (“The grand jury is said to stand between the accuser and the accused.... ”). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Andrew Jackson Hotel, Inc. v. Platt
neutral
2 sentences1963In Andrew Jackson Hotel, Inc. v. Platt, 19 Tenn. App. 360 , 89 S. W. (2d) 179 , the hotel’s guest delivered his automobile to the hotel’s doorman, who either took or sent the car to a garage from which the hotel received a commission on all automobiles sent there by it, and for which the hotel was held to be responsible just as if it had itself operated the garage. 1963In Andrew Jackson Hotel, Inc. v. Platt, 19 Tenn. App. 360 , 89 S. W. (2d) 179 , the hotel’s guest delivered his automobile to the hotel’s doorman, who either took or sent the car to a garage from which the hotel received a commission on all automobiles sent there by it, and for which the hotel was held to be responsible just as if it had itself operated the garage. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Yost v. Hudiburg
neutral
1 sentence1932Gibson says, “this is the great rule.” The opinion of this Court in Yost v. Hudiburg, 70 Tenn., 627, 630 , and of the Court of Appeals in Farmers Bank of Lynchburg v. Farrar, 4 Tenn. Appeals, 186, are particularly relied on. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Tarwater
green
1 sentence1919“To this rule it is held that all others, except those founded upon public policy, and the necessity of sustaining established principles of law, are not only subordinate but auxiliary.” The rule is spoken of by Chief Justice Beakd in Frank v. Frank, 120 Tenn., 580 , 111 S. W., 1121 , as follows: “In every case the courts assiduously seek to ascertain the intention of the testator, and, when ascertained, it will be given effect, unless it contravenes some rule of law or public policy.” See, also, to the same effect, Pritchard on Wills, sections 387, 393; East v. Burns, 104 Tenn., 182 , 56 S. W | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist Church
green
1 sentence1904The great principle of the common law, which is equally the teaching of Christian morality, so to use one’s property as not to injure others, forbids any other application or use of the rights and powers conferred.” 108 U. S., 317 , 2 Sup. Ct., 727, 27 L.Ed., 744 . | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning Railroad
green
1 sentence1903Munson v. Railroad, 103 N. Y., 58 , 8 N. E., 355 . | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.
green
1 sentence1903Munson v. Railroad, 103 N. Y., 58 , 8 N. E., 355 . | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.