great principle in Indiana

2007However, as we have said, “the great rule in drawing briefs consists in conciseness with perspicuity.” Gardner v. Stover, (1873) 43 Ind. 356 .

1975However, as we have said, “the great rule in drawing briefs consists in conciseness with perspicuity.” Gardner v. Stover, (1873) 43 Ind. 356 .

1973“The litigant had the legal right to have the law, as determined by the Supreme Court, presented to the jury by his counsel.” *264 To further his contention, appellant also cites Bryant v. State (1933), 205 Ind. 372 , 186 N.E. 322 , as follows: “. . .

1973“The litigant had the legal right to have the law, as determined by the Supreme Court, presented to the jury by his counsel.” *264 To further his contention, appellant also cites Bryant v. State (1933), 205 Ind. 372 , 186 N.E. 322 , as follows: “. . .

1908A governmental power under which the care and control of prisons fall is the great one commonly called the ‘police power.’ In caring for prisons a county exercises part of this great power by virtue of its delegation to it by the legislature, and it is no more liable for the wrongful or negligent acts of the officers in immediate charge of the prison than is the State for the tor tuous conduct of officers placed in charge of the prisons controlled by the State directly.” White v. Board, etc. (1891), 129 Ind. 396 .

1906The great principle should not have a narrow or technical construction, but should be applied to all classes of cases where a judicial officer is called upon to decide controversies between the people.” See, also, Hall v. Thayer (1870), 105 Mass. 219 , 7 Am.

1906The great principle of the common law, which is equally the teaching of Christian morality, so to use one’s property as not to injure others, forbids any other application or use of the rights and powers conferred.” It is perhaps as much úpon the ground of proprietorship as any other that it was held in Twist v. City of Rochester (1899), 55 N. Y.

1906Supp. 850 , affirmed in 165 N. Y. 619 , 59 N. E. 1131 , that a city was liable for permitting a patrol wire, heavily charged with electricity, to fall and remain in a public street.

1906Supp. 850 , affirmed in 165 N. Y. 619 , 59 N. E. 1131 , that a city was liable for permitting a patrol wire, heavily charged with electricity, to fall and remain in a public street.

1897Co. v. Bowen, 40 Ind. 545 .” This language sounds more like an apology than the decision of a great principle.

1892Boos v. Morgan, 130 Ind. 305 ; Shattuck v. Cox, 128 Ind. 293 ; Huffmond v. Bence, 128 Ind. 131 ; Paxton v. Sterne, 127 Ind. 289 , and cases cited.

1892Boos v. Morgan, 130 Ind. 305 ; Shattuck v. Cox, 128 Ind. 293 ; Huffmond v. Bence, 128 Ind. 131 ; Paxton v. Sterne, 127 Ind. 289 , and cases cited.

1892Boos v. Morgan, 130 Ind. 305 ; Shattuck v. Cox, 128 Ind. 293 ; Huffmond v. Bence, 128 Ind. 131 ; Paxton v. Sterne, 127 Ind. 289 , and cases cited.

1892The light from these sources falls fully upon the case before us, but it was entirely absent from the ease as made by the record in Ewing v. Jones, supra. The great rule, we may say at the outset, for the construction of instruments is to discover and execute the intention of the contracting parties.

1892Boos v. Morgan, 130 Ind. 305 ; Shattuck v. Cox, 128 Ind. 293 ; Huffmond v. Bence, 128 Ind. 131 ; Paxton v. Sterne, 127 Ind. 289 , and cases cited.

1887Evans v. Evans, 105 Ind. 204 ; Bass v. Elliott, 105 Ind. 517 ; Burkett v. Holman, 104 Ind. 6 ; Burkett v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 184 ; Powell v. Powell, 104 Ind. 18 ; Robertson v. State, ex rel., supra. It is hardly too much to say, that no statute which applies to a general subject, and is to be enforced by judicial proceedings, is to be considered apart from all other laws, for, surely, no one statute of the character indicated can be reasonably deemed the sole repository of the law upon a general subject, governing all its phases and incidents.

1887Evans v. Evans, 105 Ind. 204 ; Bass v. Elliott, 105 Ind. 517 ; Burkett v. Holman, 104 Ind. 6 ; Burkett v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 184 ; Powell v. Powell, 104 Ind. 18 ; Robertson v. State, ex rel., supra. It is hardly too much to say, that no statute which applies to a general subject, and is to be enforced by judicial proceedings, is to be considered apart from all other laws, for, surely, no one statute of the character indicated can be reasonably deemed the sole repository of the law upon a general subject, governing all its phases and incidents.

1887Evans v. Evans, 105 Ind. 204 ; Bass v. Elliott, 105 Ind. 517 ; Burkett v. Holman, 104 Ind. 6 ; Burkett v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 184 ; Powell v. Powell, 104 Ind. 18 ; Robertson v. State, ex rel., supra. It is hardly too much to say, that no statute which applies to a general subject, and is to be enforced by judicial proceedings, is to be considered apart from all other laws, for, surely, no one statute of the character indicated can be reasonably deemed the sole repository of the law upon a general subject, governing all its phases and incidents.

1887Evans v. Evans, 105 Ind. 204 ; Bass v. Elliott, 105 Ind. 517 ; Burkett v. Holman, 104 Ind. 6 ; Burkett v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 184 ; Powell v. Powell, 104 Ind. 18 ; Robertson v. State, ex rel., supra. It is hardly too much to say, that no statute which applies to a general subject, and is to be enforced by judicial proceedings, is to be considered apart from all other laws, for, surely, no one statute of the character indicated can be reasonably deemed the sole repository of the law upon a general subject, governing all its phases and incidents.

1887Evans v. Evans, 105 Ind. 204 ; Bass v. Elliott, 105 Ind. 517 ; Burkett v. Holman, 104 Ind. 6 ; Burkett v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 184 ; Powell v. Powell, 104 Ind. 18 ; Robertson v. State, ex rel., supra. It is hardly too much to say, that no statute which applies to a general subject, and is to be enforced by judicial proceedings, is to be considered apart from all other laws, for, surely, no one statute of the character indicated can be reasonably deemed the sole repository of the law upon a general subject, governing all its phases and incidents.

1822Brooks v. Marbury, 11 Wheat. 78, 82 .